Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A. T. Still University, AZ, USA.
Evid Based Dent. 2022 Mar;23(1):22-23. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0246-y. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
Data sources Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PLOS) were queried to identify studies that investigated the effects of probiotics against oral cancer, published in the English language between January 2015 and February 2020.Study selection Randomised controlled trials (RCT) including in vivo and in vitro studies that evaluated the effects of probiotics against oral cancer were included.Data extraction and synthesis The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. Screening of titles, abstracts and full texts was done independently by four authors with disagreements resolved by mutual discussion. Individual studies' year, author, country, as well as strain of probiotics, type of sample, mechanisms of probiotics and outcomes, were analysed by two authors. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools (Checklist for Randomised Controlled Trial) by three authors. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager software, Version 5.3 and results were reported in odds ratio. Inconsistency test (I2) was used to examine the heterogeneity between studies.Results From an initial 774 articles, only five met the study eligibility criteria to be included in this review. Two studies used in vivo animal models and three studies conducted in vitro experiments using cancer and normal cell lines. There were no studies on humans. Four probiotics were reported to inhibit oral carcinogenesis; namely, Acetobacter syzygii (A. syzygii), Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum), Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) Ren and AJ2 (combination of Streptococcus thermophiles, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus bulgaricus). Two studies that used L. salivarius Ren were combined quantitatively in a meta-analysis which showed 95% reduction of risk in oral cancer development (OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.23; p <0.05).Conclusions Within the limitations of in vivo (animal) and in vitro (cell lines) studies, the authors concluded that the probiotics analysed in this review, especially L. salivarius Ren, seem to play a role in oral cancer inhibition.
为了确定研究益生菌对口腔癌的影响,检索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 PLOS),这些研究均发表于 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间的英文文献中。
包括体内和体外研究的随机对照试验(RCT)被纳入本系统评价,这些研究评估了益生菌对口腔癌的影响。
遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015 指南进行本系统评价。四位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,如果存在分歧,则通过共同讨论解决。两位作者分析了各研究的年份、作者、国家、益生菌菌株、样本类型、益生菌的作用机制和结果。三位作者使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的批判性评价工具(随机对照试验检查表)评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用 Review Manager 软件进行荟萃分析,版本 5.3,结果以比值比报告。使用不一致性检验(I2)来检验研究之间的异质性。
从最初的 774 篇文章中,只有 5 篇符合纳入本综述的研究标准。两项研究使用了体内动物模型,三项研究使用了癌症和正常细胞系进行了体外实验。没有关于人类的研究。有四种益生菌被报道可以抑制口腔癌的发生;分别是,醋酸杆菌(A. syzygii)、植物乳杆菌(L. plantarum)、唾液乳杆菌(L. salivarius)Ren 和 AJ2(嗜热链球菌、短双歧杆菌、长双歧杆菌、婴儿双歧杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌、植物乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌、保加利亚乳杆菌的组合)。两项使用 L. salivarius Ren 的研究在定量分析中进行了合并,结果显示口腔癌发展的风险降低了 95%(OR=0.05,95%CI 0.01-0.23;p<0.05)。
在体内(动物)和体外(细胞系)研究的限制内,作者得出结论,本综述中分析的益生菌,特别是唾液乳杆菌 Ren,似乎在抑制口腔癌方面发挥作用。