• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,快速部署虚拟模拟课程,以准备进行重症监护分诊。

Rapid deployment of a virtual simulation curriculum to prepare for critical care triage during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2022 Jun;24(4):382-389. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00280-6. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1007/s43678-022-00280-6
PMID:35338451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8956452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada, an Emergency Standard of Care for Major Surge was created to establish a uniform process for the "triage" of finite critical care resources. This proposed departure from usual clinical care highlighted the need for an educational tool to prepare physicians for making and communicating difficult triage decisions. We created a just-in-time, virtual, simulation-based curriculum and evaluated its impact for our group of academic Emergency Physicians.

METHODS

Our curriculum was developed and evaluated following Stufflebeam's Context-Input-Process-Product model. Our virtual simulation sessions, delivered online using Microsoft Teams, addressed a range of clinical scenarios involving decisions about critical care prioritization (i.e., Triage). Simulation participants completed a pre-course multiple-choice knowledge test and rating scales pertaining to their attitudes about using the Emergency Standard of Care protocol before and 2-4 weeks after participating. Qualitative feedback about the curriculum was solicited through surveys.

RESULTS

Nine virtual simulation sessions were delivered over 3 weeks, reaching a total of 47 attending emergency physicians (74% of our active department members). Overall, our intervention led to a 36% (95% CI 22.9-48.3%) improvement in participants' self-rated comfort and attitudes in navigating triage decisions and communicating with patients at the end of life. Scores on the knowledge test improved by 13% (95% CI 0.4-25.6%). 95% of participants provided highly favorable ratings of the course content and similarly indicated that the session was likely or very likely to change their practice. The curriculum has since been adopted at multiple sites around the province.

CONCLUSION

Our novel virtual simulation curriculum facilitated rapid dissemination of the Emergency Standard of Care for Major Surge to our group of Emergency Physicians despite COVID-19-related constraints on gathering. The active learning afforded by this method improved physician confidence and knowledge with these difficult protocols.

摘要

背景

在加拿大安大略省 COVID-19 大流行期间,制定了一项重大激增紧急标准护理,以建立有限重症监护资源“分诊”的统一流程。这种偏离常规临床护理的做法突显了需要一种教育工具,为医生制定和传达困难的分诊决策做好准备。我们创建了一个即时、虚拟、基于模拟的课程,并评估了其对我们这群急诊医生的影响。

方法

我们的课程是根据 Stufflebeam 的上下文-输入-过程-产品模型开发和评估的。我们的虚拟模拟课程通过使用 Microsoft Teams 在线提供,涉及一系列涉及重症监护优先级决策(即分诊)的临床场景。模拟参与者在参加课程之前和 2-4 周后完成了一次课前多项选择知识测试和与使用紧急标准护理协议相关的态度评定量表。通过问卷调查征求了对课程的定性反馈。

结果

在 3 周内共进行了 9 次虚拟模拟课程,共有 47 名主治急诊医生(占我们在职部门成员的 74%)参加。总体而言,我们的干预措施使参与者在导航分诊决策和与临终患者沟通方面的自我舒适度和态度提高了 36%(95%CI 22.9-48.3%)。知识测试的分数提高了 13%(95%CI 0.4-25.6%)。95%的参与者对课程内容给予高度好评,并同样表示该课程很可能或非常可能改变他们的实践。该课程已在该省的多个地点采用。

结论

尽管 COVID-19 限制了聚集,但我们新颖的虚拟模拟课程仍能快速向我们的急诊医生群体传播重大激增紧急标准护理。这种主动学习方法提高了医生对这些困难协议的信心和知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/8956452/5e8e043720e0/43678_2022_280_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/8956452/be0db14e63d2/43678_2022_280_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/8956452/5e8e043720e0/43678_2022_280_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/8956452/be0db14e63d2/43678_2022_280_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/8956452/5e8e043720e0/43678_2022_280_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rapid deployment of a virtual simulation curriculum to prepare for critical care triage during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,快速部署虚拟模拟课程,以准备进行重症监护分诊。
CJEM. 2022 Jun;24(4):382-389. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00280-6. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
2
Canadian emergency medicine and critical care physician perspectives on pandemic triage in COVID-19.加拿大急诊医学和重症医学医生对COVID-19大流行期间分诊的看法。
J Emerg Manag. 2020;18(7):31-35. doi: 10.5055/jem.2020.0484.
3
A preliminary study of a novel emergency department nursing triage simulation for research applications.一项用于研究应用的新型急诊科护理分诊模拟的初步研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jan 3;10(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2337-3.
4
Physician and administrator experience of preparing to implement Ontario's intensive care unit Triage Emergency Standard of Care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.医生和管理人员在新冠疫情期间准备实施安大略省重症监护病房分诊紧急护理标准的经验:一项定性研究
CMAJ Open. 2023 Sep 19;11(5):E838-E846. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220168. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
5
COVID-19 critical care triage across Canada: a narrative synthesis and ethical analysis of early provincial triage protocols.加拿大 COVID-19 重症监护分诊:对早期省级分诊方案的叙述性综合和伦理分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;71(8):1126-1136. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02744-y. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
A Statewide Collaboration to Deliver and Evaluate a Pediatric Critical Care Simulation Curriculum for Emergency Medical Services.一项为紧急医疗服务提供和评估儿科重症监护模拟课程的全州范围合作。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 14;10:903950. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.903950. eCollection 2022.
7
Interactive virtual cases for emergency medicine physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间面向急诊医学医生的交互式虚拟病例
CJEM. 2021 Sep;23(5):700-703. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00155-2. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
Perspectives of Triage Team Members Participating in Statewide Triage Simulations for Scarce Resource Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Washington State.参与华盛顿州 COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源分配全州分诊模拟的分诊小组成员的观点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7639.
9
Building Long-Term Care Staff Capacity During COVID-19 Through Just-in-Time Learning: Evaluation of a Modified ECHO Model.通过即时学习在 COVID-19 期间建立长期护理人员能力:对改良 ECHO 模型的评估。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):238-244.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.039. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
10
vTrain: a novel curriculum for patient surge training in a multi-user virtual environment (MUVE).vTrain:一种在多用户虚拟环境(MUVE)中进行患者激增培训的新型课程。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Jun;28(3):215-22. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000083. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Translational simulation revisited: an evolving conceptual model for the contribution of simulation to healthcare quality and safety.再探转化性模拟:模拟对医疗质量与安全贡献的演进概念模型
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 May 8;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00291-6.
2
Palliative Care e-Learning for Physicians Caring for Critically Ill and Dying Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Outcome Evaluation with Self-Assessed Knowledge and Attitude.COVID-19 大流行期间,针对重症和临终患者的姑息治疗医生在线学习:自我评估知识和态度的结果评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912377.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a national, standardized simulation case template.开发一个全国性的标准化模拟病例模板。
CJEM. 2020 Jun 22;22(6):822-824. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.394.
2
Evaluation in health professions education-Is measuring outcomes enough?卫生专业教育中的评估——仅衡量结果是否足够?
Med Educ. 2022 Jan;56(1):127-136. doi: 10.1111/medu.14654. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department.
Simulation changing the face of healthcare improvement: a silver lining from the COVID-19 pandemic?
模拟改变医疗改善的面貌:新冠疫情带来的一线希望?
CJEM. 2022 Jun;24(4):357-358. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00324-x. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
对复苏室进行压力测试:在加拿大一所学术性急诊科的跨专业现场模拟中发现的对患者安全的潜在威胁。
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Dec 27;4(3):254-261. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10422. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Enhancing departmental preparedness for COVID-19 using rapid-cycle in-situ simulation.利用快速循环现场模拟提高部门应对 COVID-19 的准备能力。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Aug;105(4):604-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
5
Virtual application of simulation during a pandemic.疫情期间模拟的虚拟应用。
CJEM. 2020 Apr 24:1-6. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.375.
6
Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing.促进模拟中的卓越与反思性学习(PEARLS):医疗保健模拟汇报混合方法的开发与基本原理
Simul Healthc. 2015 Apr;10(2):106-15. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072.
7
A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes.对基于模拟的掌握学习及其转化成果的批判性综述。
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):375-85. doi: 10.1111/medu.12391.
8
Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training.重新思考基于模拟的培训中的保真度。
Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):387-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130.
9
Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.基于模拟的医学教育与刻意练习是否比传统临床教育产生更好的效果?对证据的荟萃分析比较评价。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):706-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119.
10
Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education.作为形成性评估的汇报:弥合医学教育中的表现差距
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1010-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x. Epub 2008 Oct 20.