Thomas P, Nariman S, Shaz A R, Sabrina L, Chai C C, Mizanur R
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Kota Samarahan Sarawak, 94300 Malaysia.
Med J Malaysia. 2022 Mar;77(2):169-173.
Observing the dearth of distinctions in the two decades of final professional medical examinations (FPE) caused concern. Multiple True False (MTF) tests with penalty scoring pulling down the scores was considered one reason. Another possible reason was having too many subjects covered in the MTF and Best Answer Question (BAQ) papers. This study aimed to explore the impact of dropping the non-core subjects with minimal inputs from MTF and BAQ papers and the students' views in this regard.
We examined the students' performance in the core and non-core subjects in MTF and BAQ papers and the impact of dropping the non-core subjects' contribution to the students' scores of the recent four final professional examinations. We also surveyed the opinions of the students, who took the FPE in the year 2000.
The failure rates were significantly higher in noncore than core subjects (p < 0.001) except in one MTF paper. The mean scores were significantly lower in non-core than core subjects in all the four FPEs (p < 0.05) except in one MTF paper. Dropping the non-core subject items from MTF and BAQ showed an improvement in the scores of MTF, theory total, and most grand totals resulting in two more students reaching distinction status. A mere 3.8% of the students could thoroughly revise the non-core subjects before the FPE. Two-fifth of them believed that non-core subjects had a significant impact on theory performance. Only 31.5% favoured dropping the non-core subjects, and an equal number preferred a status quo, while the rest suggested a reduction in their weightage.
Most of the students considered the non-core subjects important in their career. However, very few of them could revise these subjects for the professional examination. The study demonstrated that dropping the non-core subjects from MTF and BAQ improved the students' final scores and helped more students to attain distinction status.
在为期二十年的医学专业期末考试(FPE)中,观察到区分度的匮乏令人担忧。多项是非(MTF)测试采用扣分制导致分数降低被认为是一个原因。另一个可能的原因是MTF和最佳答案问题(BAQ)试卷涵盖的科目过多。本研究旨在探讨从MTF和BAQ试卷中剔除非核心科目并减少其分值投入所产生的影响,以及学生对此的看法。
我们研究了学生在MTF和BAQ试卷中核心科目与非核心科目的表现,以及剔除非核心科目对最近四次医学专业期末考试学生成绩的影响。我们还调查了2000年参加FPE的学生的意见。
除一份MTF试卷外,非核心科目的不及格率显著高于核心科目(p < 0.001)。在所有四次FPE中,除一份MTF试卷外,非核心科目的平均分数显著低于核心科目(p < 0.05)。从MTF和BAQ中剔除非核心科目项目后,MTF成绩、理论总分以及大多数总成绩均有所提高,使得多两名学生达到优秀水平。只有3.8%的学生在FPE前能够彻底复习非核心科目。其中五分之二的学生认为非核心科目对理论成绩有重大影响。只有31.5%的学生赞成剔除非核心科目,同样比例的学生希望维持现状,其余学生建议降低这些科目的权重。
大多数学生认为非核心科目对他们的职业发展很重要。然而,他们中很少有人能为专业考试复习这些科目。该研究表明,从MTF和BAQ中剔除非核心科目提高了学生的最终成绩,并帮助更多学生达到优秀水平。