Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Mar;33(3):e13745. doi: 10.1111/pai.13745.
Since overdiagnosis of beta-lactam (BL) allergy is common in the pediatric population, delabeling is a critical part of antimicrobial stewardship. Undesirable consequences of inaccurate BL allergy labeling can be handled by incorporating traditional delabeling or newer risk-based strategies into antibiotic stewardship programs. Conventional assessment of BL allergy relies upon a stepwise algorithm including a clinical history with skin testing followed by drug provocation tests (DPTs). However, a growing number of studies highlighted the suboptimal diagnostic value of skin testing in children. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in the practice of BL allergy assessment due to recent challenging data which emphasize the safety and accuracy of direct DPTs in children with a suspicion of non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions such as maculopapular eruption, delayed urticaria, and possibly also for benign immediate reactions such as urticaria/angioedema. Identifying low-risk BL allergy patients, in whom skin tests can be skipped and proceeding directly to DPTs could be safe, has become a hot topic in recent years. New risk stratification and predictive modeling studies that have the potential to better predict BL allergy risk status have recently been introduced into the field of drug allergy, particularly in adults. However, in contrast to adults, risk assessment studies in children are rare, and optimal risk definitions are controversial. In the coming years, promising potential methods to elucidate the predictors of BL allergy in children will require multidimensional approaches that may include predictive analytics, artificial intelligence techniques, and point-of-care clinical decision tools.
由于儿童人群中β-内酰胺(BL)过敏的过度诊断很常见,因此重新标记是抗菌药物管理的关键部分。通过将传统的重新标记或基于风险的新策略纳入抗生素管理计划,可以处理 BL 过敏标记不准确的不良后果。BL 过敏的传统评估依赖于包括临床病史和皮肤测试的逐步算法,然后进行药物激发试验(DPT)。然而,越来越多的研究强调了皮肤测试在儿童中的诊断价值不理想。最近,由于最近的数据具有挑战性,BL 过敏评估实践发生了范式转变,这些数据强调了在疑似非即时轻度皮肤反应(如斑丘疹、迟发性荨麻疹)的儿童中直接进行 DPT 的安全性和准确性,可能也适用于良性即时反应(如荨麻疹/血管性水肿)。确定低风险 BL 过敏患者,跳过皮肤测试并直接进行 DPT 可能是安全的,这已成为近年来的热门话题。近年来,新的风险分层和预测建模研究有可能更好地预测 BL 过敏风险状况,已被引入药物过敏领域,尤其是在成年人中。然而,与成年人相比,儿童的风险评估研究很少,并且最佳风险定义存在争议。在未来几年,阐明儿童 BL 过敏预测因素的有前途的潜在方法将需要多维方法,可能包括预测分析、人工智能技术和即时临床决策工具。