• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单部位机器人辅助与腹腔镜顺行双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的回顾性对照研究。

Single-position robot-assisted versus laparoscopic antegrade bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A retrospective controlled study.

机构信息

Urology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.

Laboratory Medicine Center, Molecular Diagnosis Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2022 Aug;45(8):1530-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.03.025
PMID:35339347
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of this study was to compare the surgical strategy and clinical outcomes of single-position robotic assisted laparoscopic anterograde bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

21 patients were diagnosis with squamous cell carcinoma and identified from March 2010 to December 2020 in our department. Ten patients were received single-position robotic assisted laparoscopic anterograde bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy (robot-assisted group), and eleven patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (laparoscopic group). Preoperative physical examination and related auxiliary examinations all indicated bilateral inguinal lymph node enlargement, and there was no distant metastasis patient presented during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

There was no intraoperative conversion to open surgery. The operation time under robot-assisted group was 104 ± 13 min which was significantly shorter than laparoscopic group (136 ± 11 min, P < 0.01). The average number of lymph nodes was 22.2 ± 4.5 of both sides in robot-assisted group, which was statistically different compared with laparoscopic group (15.4 ± 3.1, p < 0.01). Moreover, there was significant difference of hospitalization cost between two groups (CNY 67429 ± 5586 vs 28582 ± 3774, P < 0.01). No differences in operation time, blood loss, and length of stay were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-position robotic assisted laparoscopic anterograde bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy reveals with shorter operating time, and better surgical effect, Moreover, we prefer to no change the trocars layout and mechanical arm system during the operation.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较单部位机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的手术策略和临床结果。

材料与方法

2010 年 3 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,我科共诊断出 21 例鳞状细胞癌患者。其中 10 例患者接受单部位机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(机器人组),11 例患者接受腹腔镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(腹腔镜组)。术前体格检查和相关辅助检查均提示双侧腹股沟淋巴结肿大,随访期间无远处转移患者。

结果

无术中转为开放手术。机器人组的手术时间为 104±13 分钟,明显短于腹腔镜组(136±11 分钟,P<0.01)。机器人组双侧平均淋巴结数为 22.2±4.5 个,与腹腔镜组(15.4±3.1 个,P<0.01)相比有统计学差异。此外,两组的住院费用也存在显著差异(CNY 67429±5586 与 28582±3774,P<0.01)。两组在手术时间、出血量和住院时间方面无差异。

结论

单部位机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术具有手术时间短、手术效果好的优点。此外,我们在手术过程中更倾向于不改变trocar 布局和机械臂系统。

相似文献

1
Single-position robot-assisted versus laparoscopic antegrade bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A retrospective controlled study.单部位机器人辅助与腹腔镜顺行双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的回顾性对照研究。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Aug;45(8):1530-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:一项回顾性对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0571-4.
3
Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.机器人辅助同步双侧根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术联合机器人双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项可行性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):845-849. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0611. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.机器人辅助视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌患者的肿瘤学充分性的前瞻性 1 期评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1068-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11729.x. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
5
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.机器人辅助子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的学习曲线和手术结果:与腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的病例对照比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?单对接机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹膜后入路肾下淋巴结清扫术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌:我们是否需要备用手术方案?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0685-1. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.机器人辅助经腹与腹腔镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的比较。
BMC Surg. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01935-6.
8
[Clinical appraisal of laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord for the treatment of penile carcinoma: Report of 27 cases].[经脐皮下入路保留大隐静脉的腹腔镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的临床评估:附27例报告]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2023 Aug;29(8):721-724.
9
Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.比较机器人与开放式腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在阴茎癌患者中的疗效。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1518-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.061. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Long-term follow-up of comparative study of open and endoscopic lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.阴茎癌开放式与内镜下淋巴结清扫术的对比研究的长期随访。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10542-8. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) oncological and surgical benefits compared to open inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND).与开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(ILND)相比,视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEIL)的肿瘤学和手术益处。
J Mens Health. 2024 Jul;20(7):20-25. doi: 10.22514/jomh.2024.106. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Comparing Outcomes of Open and Robot-Assisted Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for the Treatment of cN2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.开放性与机器人辅助腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎cN2期鳞状细胞癌的疗效比较:一项回顾性单中心分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;16(23):3921. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233921.
3
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
机器人辅助经腹与腹腔镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的比较。
BMC Surg. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01935-6.