• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕激素预处理的赠卵周期卵巢刺激:一种选择性生育力保存的模式?

Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in oocyte donation: a model for elective fertility preservation?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital Barcelona, Spain.

Gynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jun;44(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.003
PMID:35339364
Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does type of LH peak suppression (progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation [PPOS] versus gonadotrophin releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) affect oocyte competence, embryo development and live birth rates in recipients of vitrified donated oocytes?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study conducted between 2016 and 2018, involving 187 recipient cycles of donated vitrified oocytes. Oocyte donors were stimulated under LH suppression with desogestrel for PPOS (DSG group) or ganirelix GnRH antagonist (ANT group). Recipients younger than 50 years received vitrified oocytes from DSG donation cycles (DSG-R) or ANT donation cycles (ANT-R).

RESULTS

A mean of 10.07 ± 3.54 oocytes per recipient were warmed (survival rate of 80.7%), and 5.90 ± 2.89 were fertilized (fertilization rate 72.6%). Out of 187 recipients, 168 achieved embryo transfers. No significant differences were found in warming survival rates, fertilization rates and embryo development between DSG-R and ANT-R groups. Ninety-four clinical pregnancies and 81 live births were achieved. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rates (47.7% versus 52.5, P = 0.513) and live birth rates (39.5% versus 46.5%, P = 0.336) per recipient cycle between DSG-R and ANT-R, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the effect of treating oocyte donors. Live birth rate adjusted for associated factors was not statistically different between vitrified oocytes from DSG or ANT (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.47).

CONCLUSION

Reproductive outcomes of recipients of vitrified oocytes are not affected by donor PPOS treatment. PPOS is suitable for suppressing LH peak in elective fertility preservation and in freeze-all strategies.

摘要

研究问题

黄体生成素抑制类型(孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激[PPOS]与促性腺激素释放激素[GnRH]拮抗剂)是否会影响接受玻璃化捐赠卵母细胞的患者的卵母细胞能力、胚胎发育和活产率?

设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究,于 2016 年至 2018 年进行,涉及 187 个接受玻璃化捐赠卵母细胞的受者周期。卵母细胞供体通过地屈孕酮(PPOS 组)或加尼瑞克 GnRH 拮抗剂(ANT 组)抑制 LH 进行刺激。年龄小于 50 岁的受者接受来自 DSG 捐赠周期(DSG-R)或 ANT 捐赠周期(ANT-R)的玻璃化捐赠卵母细胞。

结果

每个受者平均解冻 10.07±3.54 个卵母细胞(存活率为 80.7%),解冻后有 5.90±2.89 个卵母细胞受精(受精率为 72.6%)。在 187 名受者中,有 168 名进行了胚胎移植。DSG-R 组和 ANT-R 组在解冻存活率、受精率和胚胎发育方面无显著差异。获得 94 例临床妊娠和 81 例活产。DSG-R 组和 ANT-R 组的临床妊娠率(分别为 47.7%和 52.5%,P=0.513)和活产率(分别为 39.5%和 46.5%,P=0.336)无统计学差异。应用多变量逻辑回归评估治疗卵母细胞供体的效果。在调整了相关因素后,玻璃化的来自 DSG 或 ANT 的卵母细胞的活产率无统计学差异(OR 0.74,95%CI 0.37 至 1.47)。

结论

接受玻璃化卵母细胞的受者的生殖结局不受供体 PPOS 治疗的影响。PPOS 适用于选择性生育力保存和冷冻全部策略中抑制 LH 峰。

相似文献

1
Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in oocyte donation: a model for elective fertility preservation?孕激素预处理的赠卵周期卵巢刺激:一种选择性生育力保存的模式?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jun;44(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
2
Does LH suppression by progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation compared with GnRH antagonist affect live birth rate among oocyte recipients?促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与孕激素预处理卵巢刺激抑制 LH 对卵母细胞受者的活产率有影响吗?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 May;40(5):661-667. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
3
Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial.醋酸甲羟孕酮与加尼瑞克用于卵母细胞捐赠:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.
4
Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.卵母细胞供体刺激对受体结局的影响:来自美国一家全国性卵母细胞供体库的数据。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):847-858. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa003.
5
Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.定义一种临床策略,以提高进口玻璃化冷冻卵母细胞捐赠周期的疗效、效率和安全性。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):785-795. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa009.
6
Ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.捐卵的卵巢刺激:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Jun 22;27(4):673-696. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab008.
7
Medroxyprogesterone acetate: an alternative to GnRH-antagonist in oocyte vitrification for social fertility preservation and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.醋酸甲羟孕酮:卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻中替代 GnRH 拮抗剂的选择,用于社会生育力保存和胚胎植入前非整倍体遗传学检测。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Aug;47(2):103222. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 1.
8
Oocyte competence is comparable between progestin primed ovarian stimulation with Norethisterone acetate (NETA-PPOS) and GnRH-antagonist protocols: A matched case-control study in PGT-A cycles.孕激素预处理卵巢刺激(NETA-PPOS)和 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中卵母细胞成熟能力相当:PGT-A 周期中的匹配病例对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Mar;294:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.035. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
9
Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a useful alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in oocyte donation: a randomized, controlled trial.醋酸甲羟孕酮在卵母细胞捐赠中是一种替代促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的有用方法:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Aug;116(2):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.玻璃化冷冻对供卵周期中卵母细胞活力有何影响?一项比较新鲜与玻璃化冷冻同卵姐妹卵母细胞获得结局的前瞻性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2087-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det242. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕激素预处理卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案在辅助生殖技术中的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03612-4.
2
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in patients with nonmedical indications: a case-control study.非医学指征患者孕激素预处理卵巢刺激用于卵母细胞冷冻保存的病例对照研究
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 May 9;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01402-2.
3
Clinical outcomes of three follitropin alfa preparations for ovarian stimulation using an oral micronized progesterone-primed protocol in an oocyte donation program.
口服微粒化孕酮预处理方案在卵母细胞捐赠计划中使用三种卵泡刺激素阿尔法制剂进行卵巢刺激的临床结局。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 27;15:1451668. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1451668. eCollection 2024.