Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Department of Pediatrics, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
J Surg Res. 2022 Aug;276:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Pediatric trauma patients who lack insurance coverage may have less access to transport other than emergency medical services (EMS) or face financial barriers that prevent utilization of these services. We analyzed the association between health insurance coverage and EMS transport while controlling for injury and patient characteristics.
De-identified Trauma Quality Programs registry data were queried for pediatric trauma patients age <18 y. The primary outcome was arrival by EMS (excluding interfacility transfer) versus private transport or walk-in, and the primary exposure was insurance coverage (any versus none). After exact matching on injury and facility characteristics, propensity matching was used to balance demographic covariates and comorbidities between insured and uninsured patients.
Of the 130,246 patients analyzed, 9501 (7%) did not have insurance coverage. After matching 9494 uninsured cases to 9494 insured controls, fixed-effects logistic regression found that uninsured patients had 18% greater odds of using EMS transport, compared to insured patients (odds ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.26; P < 0.001). Results were similar when comparing uninsured patients to privately insured or publicly insured patients only.
Uninsured pediatric trauma patients have a higher likelihood of using EMS transport compared to insured patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics, including the exact same score of injury severity. Lack of access to private transport may drive higher EMS utilization in uninsured patients with minor injuries and contribute to higher costs of pediatric trauma care borne by institutions and families.
没有保险的儿科创伤患者可能较少能获得除紧急医疗服务(EMS)以外的其他交通方式,或者面临经济障碍,无法利用这些服务。我们分析了在控制损伤和患者特征的情况下,医疗保险覆盖范围与 EMS 转运之间的关联。
从创伤质量计划登记处的匿名数据中查询了年龄<18 岁的儿科创伤患者。主要结局是通过 EMS(不包括医院间转运)到达,还是私人交通或自行到达,主要暴露是保险覆盖范围(有保险与无保险)。在对损伤和医疗机构特征进行精确匹配后,采用倾向匹配来平衡有保险和无保险患者之间的人口统计学协变量和合并症。
在分析的 130246 名患者中,有 9501 名(7%)没有保险。在将 9494 名无保险病例与 9494 名有保险对照病例匹配后,固定效应逻辑回归发现,与有保险患者相比,无保险患者使用 EMS 转运的几率高 18%(比值比:1.18;95%置信区间:1.11,1.26;P<0.001)。仅比较无保险患者与私人保险或公共保险患者时,结果相似。
与具有相似人口统计学和临床特征的有保险患者相比,无保险的儿科创伤患者使用 EMS 转运的可能性更高,包括相同的损伤严重程度评分。无私人交通渠道可能导致轻伤的无保险患者更多地使用 EMS,从而增加医疗机构和家庭承担的儿科创伤护理费用。