• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

场景中语义关系的感知:注意持续的注册报告研究

Perception of semantic relations in scenes: A registered report study of attention hold.

机构信息

Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology of Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur Street, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.

Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology of Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur Street, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2022 Apr;100:103315. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103315. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2022.103315
PMID:35339910
Abstract

To what extent the semantic relations present in scenes guide spatial attention automatically remains a matter of debate. Considering that spatial attention can be understood as a sequence of shifts, engagements, and disengagements, semantic relations might affect each stage of this process differently. Therefore, we investigated whether objects that violate semantic rules engage attention for longer than objects that are expected in a given context. The experiment involved a central presentation of a distractor scene that contained a semantically congruent or incongruent object, and a peripheral presentation of a small target letter. We found that incongruent scenes did not delay responses to the peripheral target, which indicates that they did not hold attention for longer than congruent scenes. Therefore, by showing that violations of semantic relations do not engage attention automatically, our study contributes to a better understanding of how attention operates in naturalistic settings.

摘要

场景中存在的语义关系在多大程度上自动引导空间注意力仍然存在争议。考虑到空间注意力可以被理解为一系列的转移、参与和脱离,语义关系可能会以不同的方式影响这个过程的每个阶段。因此,我们研究了违反语义规则的物体是否比在给定语境中预期的物体吸引注意力的时间更长。该实验涉及在中央呈现一个分心场景,其中包含一个语义一致或不一致的物体,以及在周边呈现一个小目标字母。我们发现,不一致的场景不会延迟对周边目标的反应,这表明它们不会比一致的场景更长时间地吸引注意力。因此,通过表明违反语义关系不会自动吸引注意力,我们的研究有助于更好地理解注意力在自然环境中是如何运作的。

相似文献

1
Perception of semantic relations in scenes: A registered report study of attention hold.场景中语义关系的感知:注意持续的注册报告研究
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Apr;100:103315. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103315. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.场景要点及物体间空间依存关系在现实场景中注意力语义引导方面的作用。
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
3
Exploring the Semantic-Inconsistency Effect in Scenes Using a Continuous Measure of Linguistic-Semantic Similarity.使用语言语义相似度的连续度量来探索场景中的语义不一致效应。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jun;35(6):623-634. doi: 10.1177/09567976241238217. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Attentional capture by incongruent object/background scenes in patients with Alzheimer disease.阿尔茨海默病患者对不一致的目标/背景场景的注意捕获。
Cortex. 2018 Oct;107:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Semantic and Physical Properties of Peripheral Vision Are Used for Scene Categorization in Central Vision.中央视觉中利用周边视觉的语义和物理属性进行场景分类。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr 1;33(5):799-813. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01689.
6
Automatic Attention Capture by Threatening, But Not by Semantically Incongruent Natural Scene Images.自动注意捕捉受威胁的刺激,而不受语义上不一致的自然场景图像的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):4158-4168. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa040.
7
ObScene database: Semantic congruency norms for 898 pairs of object-scene pictures.ObScene 数据库:898 对物体-场景图片的语义一致性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3058-3071. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02181-7. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers.语义一致性和感知特征对幼儿场景观看时视觉注意力的影响。
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Nov;49:248-266. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior.纠结于语义:无关的物体-场景不一致性的处理会调节正在进行的注视行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):154-168. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1203-7.
10
Anchoring visual search in scenes: Assessing the role of anchor objects on eye movements during visual search.将视觉搜索锚定在场景中:评估锚定对象在视觉搜索过程中对眼动的作用。
J Vis. 2018 Dec 3;18(13):11. doi: 10.1167/18.13.11.

引用本文的文献

1
Does object-to-scene binding depend on object and scene consistency?物体到场景的绑定是否依赖于物体和场景的一致性?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):899-908. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03037-2. Epub 2025 Mar 4.