• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤减压性颅骨切除术中两种不同剂量3%高渗盐水联合甘露醇的效果:一项前瞻性对照研究。

Effects of two different doses of 3% hypertonic saline with mannitol during decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: A prospective, controlled study.

作者信息

Bhatnagar Neelesh, Bhateja Saurabh, Jeenger Lalita, Mangal Govind, Gupta Sunanda

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):523-528. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_169_18. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_169_18
PMID:35340963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944362/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The current study was designed to compare the effects of two different doses of 3% hypertonic saline with mannitol on intraoperative events during decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Primary outcome measures included assessment of intraoperative brain relaxation, hemodynamic variables, and serum electrolytes. Effect on the postoperative outcome, in terms of the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), length of stay in the ICU, and mortality were the secondary outcome measures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety patients with TBI undergoing craniotomy were enrolled. Patients were assigned to receive 300 mL (328 mOsm) of mannitol ( = 26, M) only or 300 mL of mannitol with 150 mL (482 mOsm) of 3% HS ( = 35, HS) or with 300 mL (636 mOsm) of 3% HS ( = 29, HS). Brain relaxation was assessed and if required, a rescue dose of mannitol (150 mL) was given. GCS was assessed preoperatively, 24 h postoperatively, and at the time of discharge from the ICU and total duration of stay was noted.

RESULTS

Acceptable brain relaxation was observed in 89.66% ( = 26, HS) and 80% ( = 28, HS) patients as compared to 46.1% ( = 12, M) patients ( < 0.001) with significantly less number of patients requiring rescue doses of mannitol in groups HS and HS( = 7 and 3, respectively) as compared to group M ( = 14) ( < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in GCS at 24 h and at the time of discharge from the ICU in patients with a severe head injury in group HS ( = 0.029). In patients with moderate head injury there was a significant improvement in GCS at the time of discharge among all the three groups ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Increasing osmotic load by addition of 3% HS to mannitol provides better intraoperative brain relaxation than mannitol alone during decompressive craniectomy. An addition of 300mL 3% HS was found to be more effective in improving GCS in patients with severe TBI.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在比较两种不同剂量的3%高渗盐水与甘露醇对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)减压性颅骨切除术术中情况的影响。主要观察指标包括术中脑松弛度、血流动力学变量和血清电解质评估。次要观察指标为对术后结果的影响,以格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和死亡率来衡量。

材料与方法

纳入90例行开颅手术的TBI患者。患者被分配接受仅300 mL(328 mOsm)甘露醇(n = 26,M组),或300 mL甘露醇加150 mL(482 mOsm)3%高渗盐水(n = 35,HS1组),或300 mL甘露醇加300 mL(636 mOsm)3%高渗盐水(n = 29,HS2组)。评估脑松弛度,如有需要,给予150 mL甘露醇的抢救剂量。术前、术后24小时、从ICU出院时评估GCS,并记录总住院时间。

结果

与46.1%(n = 12,M组)的患者相比,89.66%(n = 26,HS2组)和80%(n = 28,HS1组)的患者观察到可接受的脑松弛度(P < 0.001),与M组(n = 14)相比,HS1组和HS2组需要甘露醇抢救剂量的患者数量显著减少(分别为n = 7和n = 3)(P < 0.05)。HS2组重度颅脑损伤患者术后24小时及从ICU出院时GCS有显著改善(P = 0.029)。在中度颅脑损伤患者中,三组患者出院时GCS均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。

结论

在减压性颅骨切除术中,甘露醇添加3%高渗盐水增加渗透压负荷比单独使用甘露醇能提供更好的术中脑松弛度。发现添加300 mL 3%高渗盐水对改善重度TBI患者的GCS更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec59/8944362/042bc2307af8/JOACP-37-523-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec59/8944362/f6c37a7ff14b/JOACP-37-523-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec59/8944362/042bc2307af8/JOACP-37-523-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec59/8944362/f6c37a7ff14b/JOACP-37-523-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec59/8944362/042bc2307af8/JOACP-37-523-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of two different doses of 3% hypertonic saline with mannitol during decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: A prospective, controlled study.创伤性脑损伤减压性颅骨切除术中两种不同剂量3%高渗盐水联合甘露醇的效果:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):523-528. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_169_18. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury.高渗盐水可降低重度创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压累积负担和每日负担。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):202-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132545.
3
Mannitol versus hypertonic saline for brain relaxation in patients undergoing craniotomy.甘露醇与高渗盐水用于开颅手术患者脑松弛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 16;2014(7):CD010026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010026.pub2.
4
Comparison of equiosmolar concentrations of hypertonic saline and mannitol for intraoperative lax brain in patients undergoing craniotomy.开颅手术患者术中使用等渗浓度的高渗盐水和甘露醇使脑松弛的比较。
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 8;6:73. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.156771. eCollection 2015.
5
A comparison of equivolume, equiosmolar solutions of hypertonic saline and mannitol for brain relaxation during elective supratentorial craniotomy.等体积、等渗的高渗盐水和甘露醇溶液用于择期幕上开颅手术中脑松弛的比较。
Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(1):70-5. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1109061. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
Hyperosmolar Therapy in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review.小儿严重创伤性脑损伤的高渗治疗——系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):e1022-e1031. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004003.
7
Comparison of 20% mannitol and 3% hypertonic saline for intraoperative brain relaxation during supratentorial brain tumour craniotomy in patients with a midline shift.20%甘露醇与3%高渗盐水用于中线移位患者幕上脑肿瘤开颅术中脑松弛的比较
Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed). 2023 Nov-Dec;34(6):273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.neucie.2022.10.003. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
8
A Comparative Study of Bolus Dose of Hypertonic Saline, Mannitol, and Mannitol Plus Glycerol Combination in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.高渗盐水、甘露醇及甘露醇加甘油联合大剂量给药对重度创伤性脑损伤患者的对比研究
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e221-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.051. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
9
Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol.等容高渗溶质(氯化钠或甘露醇)治疗难治性创伤后颅内高压:2 mL/kg 7.5%盐水比2 mL/kg 20%甘露醇更有效。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1683-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063268.91710.DF.
10
Evaluation of equiosmolar 20% mannitol, 3% hypertonic saline and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate on intraoperative brain relaxation and hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors: a prospective randomized study.评价等渗 20%甘露醇、3%高渗盐水和 8.4%碳酸氢钠钠对幕上肿瘤开颅术中脑松弛和血流动力学参数的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Sep;87(9):997-1005. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15448-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 4.54% hypertonic saline and 20% mannitol for brain relaxation during auditory brainstem implantation in pediatric patients: a single-center retrospective observational cohort study.4.54%高渗盐水与 20%甘露醇在儿童患者听觉脑干植入术中脑松弛作用的比较:单中心回顾性观察队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02639-1.
2
Comparing equiosmolar hypertonic saline and mannitol for achieving brain relaxation in elective craniotomy patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较等渗高渗盐水和甘露醇在择期开颅手术患者中实现脑松弛的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Apr 5;15:116. doi: 10.25259/SNI_994_2023. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Equimolar doses of hypertonic agents (saline or mannitol) in the treatment of intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury.等摩尔剂量的高渗性药物(盐水或甘露醇)用于治疗重度创伤性脑损伤后的颅内高压。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22004. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022004.
2
Hypertonic Saline is Superior to Mannitol for the Combined Effect on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Burdens in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.高渗盐水优于甘露醇对严重颅脑损伤患者颅内压和脑灌注压负担的综合影响。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):221-230. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz046.
3
Optimal Dose and Concentration of Hypertonic Saline in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.
创伤性脑损伤中高渗盐水的最佳剂量和浓度:一项系统评价。
Medeni Med J. 2022 Jun 23;37(2):203-211. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.75725.
A Retrospective Study of Intracranial Pressure in Head-Injured Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy: A Comparison of Hypertonic Saline and Mannitol.
一项关于接受减压性颅骨切除术的头部受伤患者颅内压的回顾性研究:高渗盐水与甘露醇的比较
Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 31;9:631. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00631. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparison of equiosmolar concentrations of hypertonic saline and mannitol for intraoperative lax brain in patients undergoing craniotomy.开颅手术患者术中使用等渗浓度的高渗盐水和甘露醇使脑松弛的比较。
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 8;6:73. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.156771. eCollection 2015.
5
Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury.高渗盐水可降低重度创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压累积负担和每日负担。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):202-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132545.
6
A comparison of 3% hypertonic saline and mannitol for brain relaxation during elective supratentorial brain tumor surgery.比较 3%高渗盐水和甘露醇在择期幕上脑肿瘤手术中用于脑组织松弛的效果。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):903-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb3f8b.
7
Hypertonic saline and its effect on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain tissue oxygen.高渗盐水及其对颅内压、脑灌注压和脑组织氧的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6):1035-41; discussion 1041-2. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000359533.16214.04.
8
Hypertonic saline more efficacious than mannitol in lethal intracranial hypertension model.在致死性颅内高压模型中,高渗盐水比甘露醇更有效。
Neurol Res. 2010 Mar;32(2):139-43. doi: 10.1179/174313209X405119. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
9
Sodium lactate versus mannitol in the treatment of intracranial hypertensive episodes in severe traumatic brain-injured patients.乳酸钠与甘露醇治疗重度创伤性脑损伤患者颅内高压发作的对比研究
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Mar;35(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1283-5. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
10
Effect of equiosmolar solutions of mannitol versus hypertonic saline on intraoperative brain relaxation and electrolyte balance.甘露醇等渗溶液与高渗盐水对术中脑松弛和电解质平衡的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):697-704. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000286980.92759.94.