Chang Yi-Chin, Tzen Chi-Yuan
Department of Pathology, Taipei City Hospital, Zhongxiao Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Pathology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Cytol. 2022 Jan-Mar;39(1):20-25. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_41_21. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard of care for breast cancer (BC) patient staging. The axillary node status can be evaluated by frozen section (FS) or imprint cytology (IC). Despite the major disadvantages of tissue loss and freezing artifact in FS, many pathologists consider SLN IC a more difficult task requiring special expertise and prefer FS to IC.
To conduct a large cohort study to evaluate the results of intraoperative SLN IC, compare them with those of FS and permanent section (PS), and determine the best method for general pathologists.
A very large cohort study with many pathologists engaged was designed and the diagnostic results were compared.
With 12 pathologists engaged, we conducted the largest patient cohort study of SLN IC to date, including 4,327 consecutive BC patients undergoing SLN biopsy during the past 15 years. The touch imprints were stained using three different methods and evaluated. The PS was used as the gold standard for evaluation.
The false positivity, false negativity, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the IC and FS for each pathologist were evaluated and compared.
Our results showed an overall sensitivity of 82.7%, specificity of 99.3%, and an accuracy rate of 95.9% for SLN IC, which were comparable to those of FS. The accuracy rate did not correlate with the length of working experience and the staining method.
Intraoperative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained IC preparation was found to be the best SLN examination method for general pathologists.
前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检是乳腺癌(BC)患者分期的标准治疗方法。腋窝淋巴结状态可通过冰冻切片(FS)或印片细胞学检查(IC)进行评估。尽管FS存在组织损失和冷冻伪像等主要缺点,但许多病理学家认为SLN的IC检查是一项更具难度的任务,需要特殊专业技能,并且更倾向于使用FS而非IC。
开展一项大型队列研究,以评估术中SLN的IC检查结果,将其与FS和永久切片(PS)的结果进行比较,并确定普通病理学家的最佳方法。
设计了一项有众多病理学家参与的大型队列研究,并对诊断结果进行比较。
12名病理学家参与,我们进行了迄今为止最大规模的SLN的IC检查患者队列研究,包括过去15年中连续接受SLN活检的4327例BC患者。触摸印片采用三种不同方法染色并进行评估。PS用作评估的金标准。
评估并比较每位病理学家IC和FS的假阳性、假阴性、准确性、敏感性和特异性。
我们的结果显示,SLN的IC检查总体敏感性为82.7%,特异性为99.3%,准确率为95.9%,与FS相当。准确率与工作经验时长和染色方法无关。
术中苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的IC制片被发现是普通病理学家进行SLN检查的最佳方法。