• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

燃料电池电动汽车和压缩天然气汽车的水资源足迹比较评估。

Comparative water footprint assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles and compressed natural gas vehicles.

机构信息

College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 53 Zhengzhou Road, Qingdao 266042, People's Republic of China.

College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 53 Zhengzhou Road, Qingdao 266042, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 15;830:154820. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154820. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154820
PMID:35341846
Abstract

Utilization of renewable energy has become a current energy development trend. In this study, the water footprints of a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and a compressed natural gas vehicle (CNG) under different fuel scenarios were evaluated. The FCEV exhibits a low water footprint of 27.2 L/100 km under steam methane reforming hydrogen production technology. Hydrogen production using steam methane reforming and water electrolysis via wind can enable the FCEV industry to save more water resources. The percentage difference between different metallic materials in automobiles was analyzed. The water consumption by steel accounted for 73.6% and 80.5%, respectively. The fluctuation law of the water footprint was analyzed based on different power structures and steel water consumption coefficients. It was found that for low steel water consumption coefficient, wind power generation is conducive to slowing down the water consumption during the entire life cycle. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed for the FCEV and CNG under different fuel scenarios. Fuel technology and material structure have a significant impact on the total water footprint. The results of this study can provide guidance for the layout of the automobile industry and for water-saving measures in the future.

摘要

可再生能源的利用已成为当前能源发展的趋势。本研究评估了不同燃料情景下燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)和压缩天然气汽车(CNG)的水足迹。在蒸汽甲烷重整制氢技术下,FCEV 的水足迹低至 27.2 L/100km。使用蒸汽甲烷重整和水电解制氢通过风力发电,可使 FCEV 行业节约更多水资源。分析了汽车中不同金属材料的百分比差异。钢铁的耗水量分别占 73.6%和 80.5%。根据不同的电力结构和钢水耗系数分析了水足迹的波动规律。结果表明,对于低钢水耗系数,风力发电有利于减缓整个生命周期的耗水量。此外,还对不同燃料情景下的 FCEV 和 CNG 进行了敏感性分析。燃料技术和材料结构对总水足迹有重大影响。本研究结果可为汽车行业布局和未来节水措施提供指导。

相似文献

1
Comparative water footprint assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles and compressed natural gas vehicles.燃料电池电动汽车和压缩天然气汽车的水资源足迹比较评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 15;830:154820. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154820. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
[Life Cycle Assessment and Key Parameter Comparison of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Power Systems].氢燃料电池汽车动力系统的生命周期评估与关键参数比较
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Aug 8;43(8):4402-4412. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202110178.
3
Future methane emissions from the heavy-duty natural gas transportation sector for stasis, high, medium, and low scenarios in 2035.2035年重型天然气运输部门在停滞、高、中、低情景下的未来甲烷排放量。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017 Dec;67(12):1328-1341. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2017.1368737. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles.比较用于中型和重型车辆的天然气路径的生命周期温室气体。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 16;49(12):7123-33. doi: 10.1021/es5052759. Epub 2015 May 26.
5
Life cycle water footprint of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China.中国电动汽车和内燃机汽车的生命周期水足迹。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(33):80442-80461. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28002-0. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
Fuelling the sustainable future: a comparative analysis between battery electrical vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electrical vehicles (FCEV).推动可持续未来:电池电动汽车(BEV)与燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)的比较分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):57236-57252. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26241-9. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
7
Influence of methane emissions and vehicle efficiency on the climate implications of heavy-duty natural gas trucks.重型天然气卡车的甲烷排放和车辆效率对气候影响的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 2;49(11):6402-10. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00412. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Greenhouse Gas and Noxious Emissions from Dual Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas Heavy Goods Vehicles.双燃料柴油和天然气重型货车的温室气体和有害排放物。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 16;50(4):2018-26. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04240. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Life cycle air emissions impacts and ownership costs of light-duty vehicles using natural gas as a primary energy source.以天然气作为主要能源的轻型汽车的生命周期空气排放影响和拥有成本。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 21;49(8):5151-60. doi: 10.1021/es5045387. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles.使用氢燃料电池汽车清洁空气并改善健康状况。
Science. 2005 Jun 24;308(5730):1901-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1109157.