Quitkin F M, Rabkin J G, Stewart J W, McGrath P J, Harrison W
J Psychiatr Res. 1986;20(3):211-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(86)90004-x.
There has been an increasing interest in studying the effectiveness of antidepressants in non-melancholic depressives. For non-melancholic patients who are characterized by transient mood improvement, a single cross-sectional evaluation may reflect temporary change. Transient improvement, like any source of instability in an outcome measure, reduces validity and consequently power. To minimize the effects of transient mood change in non-melancholic depressives, we designed a two-phase drug trial. The first phase was a standard 6-week trial. Those judged responders at the end of the first phase entered the second 6-week phase. Between weeks 6 and 12 it was anticipated that a smaller proportion of six-week responders would relapse on drug than placebo, thus sharpening the contrast between treatments. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the power advantages of the 12-week design. Data is presented which suggests that a 12-week design reduces transient improvement, increases treatment effect size, and requires a smaller number of patients for equivalent statistical power. It also offers a better estimate than a 6-week study of the proportion of patients who will have persistent clinical benefit.
对于研究抗抑郁药在非抑郁性抑郁症患者中的疗效,人们的兴趣日益浓厚。对于以短暂情绪改善为特征的非抑郁性患者,单次横断面评估可能反映的是暂时变化。短暂改善如同结果测量中任何不稳定因素一样,会降低效度,进而降低效能。为了将非抑郁性抑郁症患者短暂情绪变化的影响降至最低,我们设计了一项两阶段药物试验。第一阶段是标准的6周试验。在第一阶段结束时被判定为有反应者进入第二阶段的6周试验。预计在第6周和第12周之间,与安慰剂相比,六周有反应者中药物复发的比例会更小,从而使治疗之间的对比更加明显。本文的目的是证明12周设计在效能方面的优势。所呈现的数据表明,12周设计减少了短暂改善,增加了治疗效应大小,并且对于同等的统计效能需要的患者数量更少。与6周研究相比,它还能更好地估计有持续临床获益的患者比例。