Suppr超能文献

早期的植物覆盖层比杀虫剂的应用更能有效地控制害虫。

Early-season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2022 Jul;32(5):e2598. doi: 10.1002/eap.2598. Epub 2022 May 30.

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no-till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early-season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3-year corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no-pest-management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early-season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention-based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad-spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation-based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural-enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,免耕和覆盖作物等保护性农业措施有助于保护一年生作物免受虫害,因为这些措施支持了常驻节肢动物捕食者的种群。虽然保护性农业措施的采用率在不断提高,但大多数大田作物生产者也在使用更多的杀虫剂,包括新烟碱类种子包衣剂,以防止早期虫害。这种策略可能会通过减少有助于生物防治的节肢动物来破坏与保护性农业措施相关的好处。我们调查了预防性害虫管理(PPM)与覆盖作物保护措施之间的相互作用。我们还调查了一种替代的害虫管理方法,即综合害虫管理(IPM),这种方法是根据虫害风险做出反应,而不是预防性地使用杀虫剂。在一个 3 年的玉米(Zea mays mays L.)-大豆(Glycine max L.)轮作中,我们测量了有无覆盖作物时,PPM 和 IPM 对无脊椎害虫和捕食者的影响。使用任何杀虫剂都能在一定程度上减少大豆的植株损害,但对产量没有好处。在玉米中,季节早期的植被覆盖是降低害虫密度和损害的关键,这可能是通过增加节肢动物捕食者的丰度来实现的。此外,与无虫害管理对照相比,第 1 年的 PPM 降低了捕食作用。与我们的预期相反,IPM 策略(仅需要一次杀虫剂应用)比 PPM 对捕食者群落的干扰更大,可能是因为所施用的拟除虫菊酯对更广泛的节肢动物比新烟碱类杀虫剂更具急性毒性。与基于干预的策略相比,早期种植覆盖作物更能有效地降低害虫密度和损害。我们的研究结果表明,当通过种植覆盖作物和尽可能避免广谱杀虫剂来鼓励生物防治时,可能会产生最佳的害虫管理效果。作为以保护为基础的农业方法的一部分,覆盖作物可以促进天敌种群的发展,从而有助于对虫害种群进行有效的生物防治。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验