• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使临床检查者参与到结构化反馈中,以提高评估实践。

Engaging clinical examiners with structured feedback to enhance assessment practices.

机构信息

School of Education & Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.

School of Education, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2022 Aug;44(8):914-921. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2049734. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2049734
PMID:35343380
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Examiners' professional judgements of student performance are pivotal to making high-stakes decisions to ensure graduating medical students are competent to practise. Clinicians play a key role in assessment in medical education. They are qualified in their clinical area but may require support to further develop their understanding of assessment practices. However, there are limited studies on providing examiners with structured feedback on their assessment practices for professional development purposes.

METHODS

This study adopts an interpretive paradigm to develop an understanding of clinical examiners' interpretations of receiving structured feedback and its impacts on enhancing their assessment literacy and practice. Data were collected from 29 interviews with clinical examiners who assessed the final-year medical objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) at one university.

RESULTS

Inductive thematic analysis of these data revealed that the examiners considered the feedback to be useful with practical functions in facilitating communication, comparisons and self-reflection. However, the examiners' level of confidence in the appropriateness of their assessment practices and difficulties in interpreting feedback could be barriers to adopting better practices.

CONCLUSION

Feedback for examiners needs to be practical, targeted, and relevant to support them making accountable and defensible judgements of student performance.

摘要

简介

评估者对学生表现的专业判断对于做出关乎重大利益的决策至关重要,以确保即将毕业的医学生有能力行医。临床医生在医学教育评估中发挥着关键作用。他们在自己的临床领域具备资质,但可能需要支持来进一步提高对评估实践的理解。然而,对于为专业发展目的向评估者提供关于其评估实践的结构化反馈,研究有限。

方法

本研究采用解释性范式来深入了解临床评估者对接受结构化反馈的解释及其对提高其评估素养和实践的影响。数据来自对 29 名临床评估者的访谈,这些评估者在一所大学评估了最后一年的医学客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。

结果

对这些数据的归纳主题分析表明,评估者认为反馈有用,具有促进沟通、比较和自我反思的实际功能。然而,评估者对自己评估实践的适当性的信心水平以及对反馈的解释难度可能成为采用更好实践的障碍。

结论

反馈给评估者需要具有实用性、针对性和相关性,以支持他们对学生表现做出负责任和可辩护的判断。

相似文献

1
Engaging clinical examiners with structured feedback to enhance assessment practices.使临床检查者参与到结构化反馈中,以提高评估实践。
Med Teach. 2022 Aug;44(8):914-921. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2049734. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
2
Using cultural historical activity theory to reflect on the sociocultural complexities in OSCE examiners' judgements.运用文化历史活动理论反思客观结构化临床考试执考者判断中的社会性文化复杂性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;28(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10139-1. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Feedback to support examiners' understanding of the standard-setting process and the performance of students: AMEE Guide No. 145.反馈意见有助于主考人理解标准制定过程和学生的表现:医学教育领域国际组织指南第 145 号。
Med Teach. 2022 Jun;44(6):582-595. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1993164. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Examiners' Perceptions in Surgical Education: The Blind Spot in the Assessment of OSCEs.考官在外科教育中的看法:客观结构化临床考试评估中的盲点。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Mar-Apr;78(2):590-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.标准化考生:开发一种新工具,以评估影响客观结构化临床考试分数的因素并培训考官。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001333. eCollection 2020.
6
Factors shaping e-feedback utilization following electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.电子客观结构化临床考试后影响电子反馈利用的因素。
Nurs Health Sci. 2016 Sep;18(3):362-9. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12279. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
7
Video-assisted reflection: improving OSCE feedback.视频辅助反馈:提高 OSCE 反馈效果。
Clin Teach. 2021 Aug;18(4):409-416. doi: 10.1111/tct.13354. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs.我们如何在总结性客观结构化临床考试后提供个性化音频反馈。
Med Teach. 2015 Apr;37(4):323-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.932901. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
9
The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.同伴评估在形成性反馈的客观结构化临床考试中的效果:初步研究。
Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Mar;32(1):59-65. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2020.153. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
10
Understanding patient involvement in judging students' communication skills in OSCEs.理解患者在 OSCE 中评判学生沟通技能方面的参与度。
Med Teach. 2021 Sep;43(9):1070-1078. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1915467. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of individual competencies and team performance in interprofessional ward rounds: results of a study with multimodal observations at the Heidelberg Interprofessional Training Ward.跨专业病房查房中个人能力发展与团队绩效:海德堡跨专业培训病房多模式观察研究结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 27;10:1241557. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241557. eCollection 2023.