Contreras Kallens Pablo, Dale Rick, Christiansen Morten H
Department of Psychology, Cornell University.
Department of Communication, University of California, Los Angeles.
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;14(3):634-645. doi: 10.1111/tops.12609. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Recent publications have lamented the dominance of psychology in cognitive science. However, this relies on a limited definition of collaboration between fields. We call for a renewed conception of interdisciplinarity as a "mixture of expertise." We describe an information-theoretic measure of interdisciplinarity and apply it to multiauthored published articles. Results suggest that cognitive science journals mix expertise more than topically related journals. We suggest that perceptions of diminishing interdisciplinarity may in part be due to the emergence of different theoretical perspectives and use a semantic model to illustrate this argument. We conclude by describing some benefits of this broader conception.
近期的出版物对心理学在认知科学中的主导地位表示了哀叹。然而,这依赖于对不同领域间合作的有限定义。我们呼吁重新将跨学科理解为一种“专业知识的混合”。我们描述了一种跨学科的信息论测度,并将其应用于多作者发表的文章。结果表明,认知科学期刊比主题相关期刊更能融合专业知识。我们认为,对跨学科性逐渐减少的认知,部分可能是由于不同理论视角的出现,并使用语义模型来说明这一观点。我们通过描述这一更宽泛概念的一些益处来得出结论。