• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厌氧菌覆盖对化脓性肝脓肿的预后很重要:韩国一项基于人群的研究。

Anaerobe coverage is important for the prognosis of pyogenic liver abscess: A population-based study in Korea.

作者信息

Myeong Jun-Ho, Kyoung Dae-Sung, Park Min-Ae, Kim Sang Gyune, Kim Young Seok, Yoo Jeong-Ju, Kim Min Jae

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.

Data Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co. Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2022 Apr;15(4):425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2022.03.003
PMID:35344769
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gram-negative bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli are the most common cause of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA). We investigated whether the use of anaerobic-covering antibiotics is essential for the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess.

METHODS

We analyzed the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data in Korea between 2007 and 2017. We classified PLA into two groups: a group using antibiotics that inhibited only aerobic strains (anaerobe (-) group) and a group using antibiotics that inhibited both aerobic and anaerobic strains (anaerobe (+) group). The primary outcome was the difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups.

RESULTS

During this period, a total of 30,690 PLA patients were obtained. There were 6733 patients in the anaerobe (-) group and 23,957 patients in the anaerobe (+) group. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the anaerobe (+) group than the anaerobe (-) group (7.9% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the use of anaerobic antibiotics reduced the in-hospital mortality by 42% (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.46, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age and comorbidities. Furthermore, the improvement of in-hospital mortality was present regardless of the presence of cancer or diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics covering anaerobic strains is important for the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess.

摘要

背景

肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌等革兰氏阴性菌是化脓性肝脓肿(PLA)最常见的病因。我们调查了使用覆盖厌氧菌的抗生素对化脓性肝脓肿治疗是否必不可少。

方法

我们分析了2007年至2017年韩国健康保险审查与评估服务的数据。我们将PLA分为两组:一组使用仅抑制需氧菌的抗生素(厌氧菌(-)组)和一组使用抑制需氧菌和厌氧菌的抗生素(厌氧菌(+)组)。主要结局是两组之间的住院死亡率差异。

结果

在此期间,共获得30690例PLA患者。厌氧菌(-)组有6733例患者,厌氧菌(+)组有23957例患者。厌氧菌(+)组的住院死亡率显著低于厌氧菌(-)组(7.9%对15.6%,p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,在调整年龄和合并症后,使用厌氧抗生素使住院死亡率降低了42%(比值比0.42,95%置信区间0.38 - 0.46,p<0.001)。此外,无论是否存在癌症或糖尿病,住院死亡率均有改善。

结论

使用覆盖厌氧菌株的广谱经验性抗生素对化脓性肝脓肿的治疗很重要。

相似文献

1
Anaerobe coverage is important for the prognosis of pyogenic liver abscess: A population-based study in Korea.厌氧菌覆盖对化脓性肝脓肿的预后很重要:韩国一项基于人群的研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Apr;15(4):425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
Patients with culture negative pyogenic liver abscess have the same outcomes compared to those with Klebsiella pneumoniae pyogenic liver abscess.培养结果为阴性的化脓性肝脓肿患者与肺炎克雷伯菌所致化脓性肝脓肿患者的预后相同。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016 Oct;15(5):504-511. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60127-3.
3
Comparison of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscesses.大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌所致肝脓肿的比较。
Am J Med Sci. 2007 Aug;334(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31812f59c7.
4
Anti-anaerobic coverage is not necessary for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess: a propensity score-matched cohort study.肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿无需抗厌氧菌覆盖:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;81(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
5
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Pyogenic Liver Abscess in Elderly Korean Patients.韩国老年患者化脓性肝脓肿的临床特征与转归
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;66(1):27-32. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2015.66.1.27.
6
A comparison of pyogenic liver abscess in patients with or without diabetes: a retrospective study of 246 cases.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者化脓性肝脓肿的比较:一项对246例病例的回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0875-y.
7
Early diagnosis and therapeutic choice of Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess.肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿的早期诊断与治疗选择
Front Med China. 2010 Sep;4(3):308-16. doi: 10.1007/s11684-010-0103-9. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
8
Endogenous Klebsiella endophthalmitis associated with pyogenic liver abscess.与化脓性肝脓肿相关的内源性克雷伯菌性眼内炎
Ophthalmology. 2007 May;114(5):876-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.035.
9
Pyogenic Liver Abscess: Does Escherichia Coli Cause more Adverse Outcomes than Klebsiella Pneumoniae?化脓性肝脓肿:大肠杆菌导致的不良后果是否比肺炎克雷伯菌更多?
World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2535-42. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3126-1.
10
Clinical and microbiological characteristics of pyogenic liver abscess in a tertiary hospital in East China.中国东部一家三级医院化脓性肝脓肿的临床及微生物学特征
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e8050. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008050.

引用本文的文献

1
Pyogenic liver abscess and sepsis caused by mixed anaerobic bacteria in an immunocompetent adult: a case report.免疫功能正常的成年人中由混合厌氧菌引起的化脓性肝脓肿和败血症:一例报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 13;12:1486256. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1486256. eCollection 2025.
2
Summary of clinical features of 1800 cases of pyogenic liver abscess.1800例化脓性肝脓肿的临床特征总结
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Apr 1;37(4):483-487. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002906. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3
A Nomogram Based on a Non-Invasive Method to Distinguish Between Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections of Liver Abscess.
基于非侵入性方法区分肝脓肿革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌感染的列线图
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 29;17:4237-4249. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S468251. eCollection 2024.
4
Emergence of K1 ST23 and K2 ST65 hypervirulent as true pathogens with specific virulence genes in cryptogenic pyogenic liver abscesses Shiraz Iran.在伊朗设拉子的隐源性化脓性肝脓肿中,出现了携带特定毒力基因的 K1 ST23 和 K2 ST65 超毒力菌株,成为真正的病原体。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Aug 9;12:964290. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.964290. eCollection 2022.