Davis Amelia, Mckittrick Dean, Wagner Nils
General Surgery Department, Broome Hospital, Broome, AUS.
General Practice, Western Australia Country Health Service - Kimberley, Broome, AUS.
Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23407. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23407. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Given the geographical area of the Kimberley region in Western Australia (WA) and the nomadic nature of its residents and medical staff, widespread access and clarity of surgical clinical information are necessary to provide accurate and timely post-surgical care. The aims of this project were: to evaluate the quality of operation notes and secondly, to evaluate multidisciplinary staff perceptions of the impact of the introduction of typed operation notes for general surgery in the Kimberley region from 2019 to 2020.
The quality of 100 general surgery operation notes (50 typed and 50 handwritten) were reviewed against the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng) operation note guidelines. Cases were selected at random and reviewed by a resident medical officer. Multidisciplinary staff perceptions of communication were assessed through an anonymous electronic survey across emergency departments, general practices, nursing staff, and allied health staff members from the top three population centres: Broome, Derby and Kununurra.
Typed operation notes with pre-loaded data (date, time, etc.) and mandatory fields (surgical count correct, etc.) increased recorded information and quality of content by 45% when compared to handwritten notes. When compared to RCSEng standards for free text, anticipated blood loss (one typed note) and abbreviation use (44 typed and 37 handwritten) showed ongoing user-dependent areas for improvement. A review of multidisciplinary staff perceptions (79 returned surveys) showed 60% of handwritten notes were seen to have a negative impact on timely post-operative care. Overall, typed notes increased legibility with a perceived improvement in acronyms/abbreviations and completeness of documentation. More than 90% of staff suggested an extension of typed notes for all surgical operations would be beneficial.
The Kimberley region poses a unique set of challenges to the continuity of post-surgical care. This review shows typed operation notes improve legibility (100%) and increased congruence with established guidelines by 45%. It also shows a successful model for increased local and metropolitan multidisciplinary access across remote WA for timely post-operative care. In an unprecedented time where elective surgical procedures are being reduced to meet pandemic demands, now is the time to review, consider and institute practices that improve intra-operative and post-operative care.
鉴于西澳大利亚州金伯利地区的地理面积以及当地居民和医务人员的游牧性质,为了提供准确及时的术后护理,广泛获取手术临床信息并确保其清晰明了十分必要。本项目的目的是:第一,评估手术记录的质量;第二,评估多学科工作人员对2019年至2020年在金伯利地区引入普通外科打印手术记录的影响的看法。
根据英国皇家外科医学院(RCSEng)的手术记录指南,对100份普通外科手术记录(50份打印记录和50份手写记录)的质量进行审查。病例随机选取,由住院医师进行审查。通过对来自布鲁姆、德比和库努纳拉这三个人口最多的中心的急诊科、全科医疗、护理人员和专职医疗人员进行匿名电子调查,评估多学科工作人员对沟通情况的看法。
与手写记录相比,预加载数据(日期、时间等)和必填字段(手术器械计数正确等)的打印手术记录使记录信息和内容质量提高了45%。与RCSEng的自由文本标准相比,预计失血量(一份打印记录)和缩写使用情况(44份打印记录和37份手写记录)显示仍存在依赖用户的有待改进之处。对多学科工作人员看法的审查(79份回复的调查问卷)显示,60%的手写记录被认为对及时的术后护理有负面影响。总体而言,打印记录的易读性提高,首字母缩略词/缩写的使用和文档的完整性也有明显改善。超过90%的工作人员表示,将打印记录扩展到所有外科手术将是有益的。
金伯利地区在术后护理的连续性方面面临一系列独特挑战。本次审查表明,打印手术记录提高了易读性(100%),与既定指南的一致性提高了45%。它还展示了一个成功的模式,可增加西澳大利亚偏远地区本地和大都市多学科获取及时术后护理的机会。在一个为满足疫情需求而减少择期手术的前所未有的时期,现在是时候审查、考虑并制定改善术中及术后护理的做法了。