• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项审计,旨在确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录是否符合皇家外科学院的良好手术实践标准。

An audit to identify adherence of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes to Royal College of Surgeons Good Surgical Practice standards.

机构信息

Emergency General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;191(2):825-830. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02567-6. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-021-02567-6
PMID:33715070
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency in England accounting for 40,000 admissions per year. The Good Surgical Practice guideline by Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng) defines criteria detailing what constitutes a safe and comprehensive operation note. High-quality operation notes enable continuity of care and safe post-operative management.

AIMS

(1) Assess whether laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes are adherent to RCSEng criteria. (2) Implement an operation note proforma to improve adherence. (3) Re-audit to assess effectiveness of operation note proforma.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was performed measuring compliance of laparoscopic appendicectomy notes to RCSEng criteria over a 4-month period at a central London tertiary care centre. A laparoscopic appendicectomy operation note proforma was designed and implemented. Compliance to RCSEng criteria was then re-audited against RCSEng criteria, and statistical analysis performed to assess the significance of changes to compliance.

RESULTS

The average compliance with the RCSEng guidelines after the first cycle retrospectively was 56.1%. The average compliance after implementation of the proforma was 98.2%, with above 80% of operation notes satisfying all RSCEng criteria. This was a significant 42.1% (p < 0.0001) increase in average compliance. The implementation of the proforma reduced the amount of hand-written information, saving time and improving legibility of the operation notes.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an operation note proforma has the ability to significantly improve operation note quality. This simple and effective intervention to improve operation note quality has the potential to improve post-operative safety and continuity of care post laparoscopic appendicectomy.

摘要

背景

在英国,阑尾炎是最常见的腹部急症,每年有 4 万例入院。英国皇家外科学院(RCSEng)的《良好手术实践指南》定义了详细说明构成安全和全面手术记录的标准。高质量的手术记录能够实现护理的连续性和安全的术后管理。

目的

(1)评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录是否符合 RCSEng 标准。(2)实施手术记录表格以提高依从性。(3)重新审核以评估手术记录表格的效果。

方法

在伦敦市中心的三级护理中心进行了为期 4 个月的回顾性审核,以衡量腹腔镜阑尾切除术记录符合 RCSEng 标准的情况。设计并实施了腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录表格。然后根据 RCSEng 标准重新审核符合 RCSEng 标准的情况,并进行统计分析以评估对符合率的影响。

结果

第一个周期的 RCSEng 指南平均符合率为 56.1%。实施表格后,平均符合率为 98.2%,超过 80%的手术记录满足所有 RSCEng 标准。这是平均符合率显著提高了 42.1%(p<0.0001)。表格的实施减少了手写信息的数量,节省了时间并提高了手术记录的可读性。

结论

实施手术记录表格能够显著提高手术记录的质量。这种简单有效的干预措施可以提高术后安全性和腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的护理连续性。

相似文献

1
An audit to identify adherence of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes to Royal College of Surgeons Good Surgical Practice standards.一项审计,旨在确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录是否符合皇家外科学院的良好手术实践标准。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;191(2):825-830. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02567-6. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
2
Improving the quality of operative notes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Assessing the impact of a standardized operation note proforma.提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术记录的质量:评估标准化手术记录模板的影响。
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Assessing the standard of emergency general surgical (EGS) operation notes in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines.根据皇家外科医学院的指南评估急诊普通外科(EGS)手术记录的标准。
Turk J Surg. 2024 Mar 23;40(1):11-18. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6194. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Improving the quality of operation notes: Effect of using proforma, audit and education sessions.提高手术记录质量:使用表单、审核和教育课程的效果。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jul;43(7):755-758. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Improving the Quality of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Notes in an Indian Public Sector Hospital in Accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: A Completed Audit Loop Study.依据皇家外科医学院指南提高印度一家公立部门医院口腔颌面外科手术记录的质量:一项完整审核循环研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Sep;15(3):315-320. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0850-x. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
Assessing the Adherence of Operative Notes for Laparoscopic Appendectomy with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines.评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录与皇家外科医学院指南的符合程度。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Feb;31(2):202-205. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.02.202.
7
Usefulness of Royal College of Surgeons of England operation note guidelines to neurosurgical practice: a closed loop audit.
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;35(4):418-423. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1817858. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
'Smart' electronic operation notes in surgery: an innovative way to improve patient care.手术中的“智能”电子手术记录:改善患者护理的创新方法。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):30-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
9
Improving the quality of general surgical operation notes in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines: a prospective completed audit loop study.按照皇家外科学院的指南提高普通外科手术记录的质量:前瞻性完成的审核循环研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):578-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01626.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
10
Assessing the Quality of Orthopaedic Operation Notes in Accordance With the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: An Audit Cycle.根据皇家外科医学院指南评估骨科手术记录质量:一次审计循环。
Cureus. 2020 Aug 12;12(8):e9707. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9707.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Compliance With Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) Appendectomy Documentation Guidelines: A Two-Cycle Audit at a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom.提高对首次正确处理(GIRFT)阑尾切除术文档指南的依从性:英国一家区综合医院的两轮审计
Cureus. 2025 Aug 11;17(8):e89833. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89833. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The missing element in urology training: operative dictation skills.泌尿外科培训中缺失的要素:手术记录技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 30;25(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07032-x.
3
When Precision Meets Penmanship: ChatGPT and Surgery Documentation.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there adequate information on operation notes? The application of the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines.
J Perioper Pract. 2010 Sep;20(9):339-42. doi: 10.1177/175045891002000905.
当精准遇上书法:ChatGPT与手术记录
Cureus. 2023 Jun 17;15(6):e40546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40546. eCollection 2023 Jun.