Otorhinolaryngology Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Otorhinolaryngology Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep;51(9):1170-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
This research study was designed to evaluate the aesthetic consequences of different dorsal augmentation techniques using diced cartilage on dorsal width and projection in rhinoplasty. Patients were assigned to three groups based on the dorsal augmentation technique used: diced cartilage wrapped in fascia (DCIF), free diced cartilage under fascia (DCUF), and free diced cartilage without fascia (FDC). Dorsal projection and dorsal aesthetic width were measured at two levels using pre- and postoperative photographs. A total of 98 patients were included in the study. DCIF was used in 51 patients, FDC in 27 patients, and DCUF in 20 patients. There was no significant difference in nasion projection, rhinion projection, or width of the dorsal aesthetic lines at the intercanthal and keystone levels among these groups. Significantly greater nasion and rhinion projection was observed with DCIF in thin-skinned patients followed-up for 6-12 months (nasion, P = 0.028; rhinion P = 0.039) but not at>12 months. Two patients with a graft infection and one with graft malposition were encountered in the DCIF group. Experience from this study suggests that the application of FDC prevents such complications without sacrificing the dorsal augmentation and that DCIF is a better choice for more severe deformities.
本研究旨在评估不同的背侧增宽技术在鼻整形术中使用软骨丁对背侧宽度和突出度的美学效果。根据使用的背侧增宽技术将患者分为三组:筋膜包裹软骨丁(DCIF)、筋膜下游离软骨丁(DCUF)和无筋膜游离软骨丁(FDC)。使用术前和术后照片在两个水平测量背侧突出度和背侧美学宽度。共有 98 例患者纳入研究。51 例患者采用 DCIF,27 例患者采用 FDC,20 例患者采用 DCUF。在这些组中,眉间突出度、鼻翼突出度或内眦和关键点水平的背侧美学线宽度没有显著差异。在随访 6-12 个月时,薄皮患者的 DCIF 组观察到明显更大的眉间和鼻翼突出度(眉间,P = 0.028;鼻翼,P = 0.039),但>12 个月时则没有。在 DCIF 组中,有 2 例患者出现移植物感染,1 例患者出现移植物错位。本研究经验表明,FDC 的应用可预防此类并发症,而不会牺牲背侧增宽效果,并且对于更严重的畸形,DCIF 是更好的选择。