Suppr超能文献

一线抗雄激素受体靶向治疗失败后接受二线治疗的去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的临床转归和预后变量。

Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Variables of Second-line Therapy for Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Failure of First-line Androgen Receptor Axis-targeted Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2022 Apr;42(4):2123-2130. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15694.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the rapid introduction of androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTA) into clinical practice for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the optimal treatment strategy after first-line ARTA remains unclear. The object of this study was to clarify clinical outcomes of second-line therapy for CRPC after first-line ARTA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 130 consecutive patients with CRPC with disease progression during first-line ARTA and who started second-line therapy at our Institution between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients with CRPC were identified. Ninety patients underwent ARTA-ARTA treatment, and 40 patients underwent ARTA-docetaxel treatment. The median observation period after second-line ARTA or docetaxel administration was 14.2 months. The prostate-specific antigen response rates overall, and after second-line ARTA, and docetaxel were 26.8%, 24.7%, and 31.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and 1- and 2-year PFS rates of second-line therapy were 7.9 months and 34.6% and 15.4%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 27.4 months and 81.8%, and 54.9%, respectively. Multivariate analyses for OS disclosed that a C-reactive protein over the upper limit of normal and time from first-line ARTA to progression under 12 months were associated with shorter OS. Prostate-specific antigen response, PFS and OS of second-line therapy were not significantly different between second-line ARTA and docetaxel.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in OS between ARTA-ARTA and ARTA-docetaxel groups in the present study, suggesting that second-line ARTA might be the preferred treatment after initial failure of ARTA.

摘要

背景

尽管雄激素受体靶向药物(ARTA)在去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)的临床实践中迅速引入,但一线 ARTA 后最佳的治疗策略仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明一线 ARTA 后 CRPC 二线治疗的临床结果。

患者和方法

分析了 2014 年至 2020 年间在我院接受一线 ARTA 期间疾病进展并开始二线治疗的 130 例连续 CRPC 患者的病历。

结果

共确定了 130 例 CRPC 患者。90 例患者接受了 ARTA-ARTA 治疗,40 例患者接受了 ARTA-多西他赛治疗。二线 ARTA 或多西他赛给药后中位观察期为 14.2 个月。二线治疗后的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应率、二线 ARTA 治疗后和多西他赛治疗后的 PSA 反应率分别为 26.8%、24.7%和 31.6%。二线治疗的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和 1 年和 2 年 PFS 率分别为 7.9 个月、34.6%和 15.4%。中位总生存期(OS)和 1 年和 2 年 OS 率分别为 27.4 个月、81.8%和 54.9%。OS 的多变量分析显示,C 反应蛋白超过正常值上限和一线 ARTA 至进展时间不足 12 个月与 OS 较短相关。二线 ARTA 和多西他赛的二线治疗的 PSA 反应、PFS 和 OS 无显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,二线 ARTA-ARTA 和 ARTA-多西他赛组之间的 OS 无显著差异,表明二线 ARTA 可能是一线 ARTA 治疗失败后的首选治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验