• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡巴他赛对比既往接受多西他赛和雄激素受体靶向药物(ARTA)治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的二线 ARTA 的经济学评价:美国支付者视角。

An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

US Oncology, Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):916. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x
PMID:35836170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9284907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the CARD trial (NCT02485691). We aimed to estimate healthcare costs avoided with the use of cabazitaxel as a third-line (3 L) treatment versus a second ARTA from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

Model inputs were based on the CARD trial, published sources, and estimates of typical clinical care patterns by genitourinary oncologists (n = 3). Assessed time points were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS); hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) days; and costs (reported in 2020 US dollar [USD] and converted into Euro) to manage symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), adverse events (AEs), and end-of-life care.

RESULTS

At 18 months, in a cohort of 100 patients, the use of cabazitaxel was estimated to result in 9 more patients achieving rPFS, 2 more patients achieving PFS, and 17 more survivors versus a second ARTA. The costs of SSEs, AEs, and end-of-life care were $498,909 (€424,073), $276,198 (€234,768), and $808,785 (€687,468), respectively, for cabazitaxel and $627,569 (€533,434), $251,124 (€213,455), and $1,028,294 (€874,050), respectively, for a second ARTA. Cabazitaxel was estimated to be associated with a 21% reduction in both SSE management and end-of-life care costs. Hospitalization cost was $1,442,870 (€1,226,440) for cabazitaxel and $1,728,394 (€1,469,135) for a second ARTA, representing an estimated 17% reduction in these costs. Cabazitaxel, as compared with a second ARTA, was associated with 58 fewer hospitalization days and 2 fewer ICU days and was estimated to avoid $323,095 (€274,630, 17%) in total costs, driven by SSEs management and end-of-life care.

CONCLUSION

The use of cabazitaxel as a 3 L treatment after docetaxel and an ARTA in patients with mCRPC is estimated to result in clinical benefits (longer rPFS, PFS, and OS) and lower healthcare resource utilization (fewer hospitalization and ICU days), compared with a second ARTA.

摘要

背景

在先前接受过多西他赛和第二代抗雄激素靶向药物(ARTA)治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中,卡巴他赛与第二代 ARTA(阿比特龙或恩扎鲁胺)相比,显著改善了临床结局,这在 CARD 试验(NCT02485691)中得到了证实。我们旨在从美国支付者的角度评估使用卡巴他赛作为三线(3L)治疗方案相较于第二代 ARTA 可避免的医疗保健成本。

方法

模型输入基于 CARD 试验、已发表的资源以及泌尿科肿瘤学家对典型临床护理模式的估计(n=3)。评估的时间点为 6、12、18 和 24 个月。结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)、放射学无进展生存期(rPFS)和总生存期(OS);住院和重症监护病房(ICU)天数;以及管理症状性骨骼事件(SSEs)、不良事件(AEs)和生命终末期护理的成本(以 2020 年美元(USD)报告并转换为欧元)。

结果

在 18 个月时,在 100 名患者的队列中,与第二代 ARTA 相比,使用卡巴他赛估计可使 9 名患者实现 rPFS、2 名患者实现 PFS 以及 17 名患者存活。SSEs、AEs 和生命终末期护理的成本分别为卡巴他赛的 498,909 美元(424,073 欧元)、276,198 美元(234,768 欧元)和 808,785 美元(687,468 欧元),以及第二代 ARTA 的 627,569 美元(533,434 欧元)、251,124 美元(213,455 欧元)和 1,028,294 美元(874,050 欧元)。卡巴他赛与 SSE 管理和生命终末期护理成本降低 21%相关。卡巴他赛的住院费用为 1,442,870 美元(1,226,440 欧元),第二代 ARTA 的住院费用为 1,728,394 美元(1,469,135 欧元),这些费用预计会降低 17%。与第二代 ARTA 相比,卡巴他赛的住院天数减少了 58 天,重症监护病房天数减少了 2 天,并且由于 SSEs 管理和生命终末期护理,预计可避免 323,095 美元(274,630 欧元,17%)的总成本。

结论

在先前接受过多西他赛和第二代 ARTA 治疗的 mCRPC 患者中,卡巴他赛作为三线治疗方案的应用,与第二代 ARTA 相比,预计可带来临床获益(更长的 rPFS、PFS 和 OS),并降低医疗资源的利用(住院和 ICU 天数更少)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/802b0fff99a2/12913_2022_8274_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/898675c434a6/12913_2022_8274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/f1850615e008/12913_2022_8274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/6467176adb0b/12913_2022_8274_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/802b0fff99a2/12913_2022_8274_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/898675c434a6/12913_2022_8274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/f1850615e008/12913_2022_8274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/6467176adb0b/12913_2022_8274_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681d/9284907/802b0fff99a2/12913_2022_8274_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective.卡巴他赛对比既往接受多西他赛和雄激素受体靶向药物(ARTA)治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的二线 ARTA 的经济学评价:美国支付者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):916. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x.
2
Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in the CARD study.基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的预测和预后生物标志物:CARD 研究。
ESMO Open. 2021 Oct;6(5):100241. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100241. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Comparison of Sequential Treatment With Androgen Receptor-Targeted Agent Followed by Another Androgen Receptor-Targeted Agent Versus Androgen Receptor-Targeted Agent Followed by Docetaxel in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.在化疗初治的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者中,雄激素受体靶向药物序贯治疗与另一种雄激素受体靶向药物序贯治疗与多西他赛化疗的比较。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):e1073-e1080. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
Real-world evidence of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel: comparison with the randomized clinical study CARD.卡巴他赛治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的真实世界证据:与随机临床研究 CARD 的比较。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Mar;26(1):67-73. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00487-1. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
Real-world outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy versus an alternative androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) following early progression on a first-line ARTA in a US community oncology setting.在美国社区肿瘤学环境中,转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者在一线雄激素受体靶向药物(ARTA)早期进展后接受二线化疗与接受另一种ARTA的真实世界结局。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Nov;36(11):500.e1-500.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.CARD 研究:卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌老年患者的疗效和安全性。
Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study.卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗转移性前列腺癌患者的生活质量(CARD):一项随机、多中心、开放性、4 期研究的分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-1525. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30449-6. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of the CARD study excluding chemohormonal therapy for castrate-naive disease.卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:CARD 研究中排除去势敏感疾病的化疗-激素治疗的事后分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 1;51(8):1287-1297. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab028.
9
Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺用于转移性前列腺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-2518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911206. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
Real-world clinical outcomes and cost estimates of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment: does sequencing of taxanes and androgen receptor-targeted agents matter?转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌治疗的真实世界临床结局和成本估计:紫杉烷类药物与雄激素受体靶向药物的序贯使用是否重要?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Feb;23(2):231-239. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2161048. Epub 2022 Dec 28.