• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于我的需求创建的电子患者报告结局值得使用:一项探索性定性研究,调查年轻人对健康评估工具的看法。

An electronic patient-reported outcome created based on my needs is worth using: an explorative qualitative study investigating young people's opinions for a health assessment tool.

作者信息

Lostelius Petra V, Mattebo Magdalena, Söderlund Anne, Revenäs Åsa, Thors Adolfsson Eva

机构信息

Clinic for Pain Rehabilitation Västmanland, Region Västmanland, Västerås, Sweden.

School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Mar 28;6(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00436-z.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-022-00436-z
PMID:35347495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8960482/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Young people in different healthcare settings are positive about using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs), which are meant to increase the effectiveness and safety of interventions from the patient's perspective. Sweden offers free healthcare to young people aged 12-25 years at 275 youth health clinics (YHCs), whose goals are to strengthen young people and promote sexual, physical, and mental health. YHCs need effective ways to identify the overall picture of young people's health and health-related problems. To our knowledge, there is no ePRO for YHCs that provides an overview of young people's health from several health perspectives. The aim of this study was to explore young people's view on content and design of an ePRO to provide an overview of their health and health related problems when visiting a YHC, and their opinion on what healthcare needs to consider when using the ePRO. This was an explorative qualitative study. The participants were included from five YHCs, in different socioeconomic areas in central Sweden. Fifteen participants were included: 10 girls, three boys, and two non-binary participants with an age range of 16-22 years. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide and individual interviews, and inductive content analysis was performed.

RESULTS

One main theme, "ePRO created based on my needs is worth using" and two sub-themes, "Appealing content and design" and "Trusting healthcare", emerged. The participants wanted that an ePRO should include overall questions about mental-, physical-, and sexual health and social support. Participants also believed the ePRO must disclose the risks of self-harm or suicide. The participants noted the importance of emotional and digital security when using the ePRO and having a confidential conversation with a healthcare provider. To share health information means to trust to gain health.

CONCLUSIONS

The study participants' views on content and design can form the basis for designing an ePRO for young people. Their thoughts on safety and treatment in healthcare can be considered in the development process. This study is the starting point for developing an ePRO for young people at YHCs.

摘要

背景

在不同医疗环境中的年轻人对使用电子患者报告结局(ePROs)持积极态度,ePROs旨在从患者角度提高干预措施的有效性和安全性。瑞典在275家青少年健康诊所(YHCs)为12至25岁的年轻人提供免费医疗服务,这些诊所的目标是增强年轻人的体质并促进其性健康、身体健康和心理健康。YHCs需要有效的方法来全面了解年轻人的健康状况以及与健康相关的问题。据我们所知,尚无适用于YHCs的ePRO能够从多个健康角度全面呈现年轻人的健康状况。本研究的目的是探讨年轻人对于一款ePRO的内容和设计的看法,该ePRO旨在概述他们在就诊于YHC时的健康状况以及与健康相关的问题,同时探讨他们对于医疗保健机构在使用该ePRO时需要考虑的因素的看法。这是一项探索性定性研究。参与者来自瑞典中部不同社会经济区域的五家YHCs。共纳入15名参与者:10名女孩、3名男孩和2名非二元性别参与者,年龄在16至22岁之间。使用半结构化访谈指南和个人访谈收集数据,并进行归纳性内容分析。

结果

出现了一个主要主题,即“基于我的需求创建的ePRO值得使用”以及两个子主题,“有吸引力的内容和设计”和“信任医疗保健机构”。参与者希望ePRO应包括有关心理、身体、性健康和社会支持的总体问题。参与者还认为ePRO必须披露自我伤害或自杀的风险。参与者指出了使用ePRO以及与医疗保健提供者进行保密对话时情感和数字安全的重要性。分享健康信息意味着为了获得健康而给予信任。

结论

研究参与者对内容和设计的看法可为设计面向年轻人的ePRO奠定基础。在开发过程中可以考虑他们对医疗保健中安全性和治疗的想法。本研究是为YHCs的年轻人开发ePRO的起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6b2/8960482/919c2035e8a3/41687_2022_436_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6b2/8960482/919c2035e8a3/41687_2022_436_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6b2/8960482/919c2035e8a3/41687_2022_436_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An electronic patient-reported outcome created based on my needs is worth using: an explorative qualitative study investigating young people's opinions for a health assessment tool.基于我的需求创建的电子患者报告结局值得使用:一项探索性定性研究,调查年轻人对健康评估工具的看法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Mar 28;6(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00436-z.
2
Development and usability evaluation of an electronic health report form to assess health in young people: a mixed-methods approach.开发和评估电子健康报告表单以评估年轻人健康状况的使用性:一种混合方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 10;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02191-7.
3
"It's about how you take in things with your brain" - young people's perspectives on mental health and help seeking: an interview study.“这关乎你的大脑如何接收事物”——年轻人对心理健康和寻求帮助的看法:一项访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18617-4.
4
Patient motivators of postoperative electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring use in thoracic surgery patients: a qualitative study.术后电子患者报告结局症状监测在胸外科患者中的使用:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 25;8(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00766-0.
5
Best practice when working with suicidal behaviour and self-harm in primary care: a qualitative exploration of young people's perspectives.在初级保健中处理自杀行为和自伤问题的最佳实践:年轻人观点的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e038855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038855.
6
Mental Health Practitioners' and Young People's Experiences of Talking About Social Media During Mental Health Consultations: Qualitative Focus Group and Interview Study.心理健康从业者与年轻人在心理健康咨询中谈论社交媒体的经历:定性焦点小组和访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 7;7:e43115. doi: 10.2196/43115.
7
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
8
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
9
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
10
Prioritizing young people's emotional health support needs via participatory research.通过参与式研究确定年轻人的情绪健康支持需求的优先级。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Jun;24(5):263-271. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12373.

引用本文的文献

1
"It's about how you take in things with your brain" - young people's perspectives on mental health and help seeking: an interview study.“这关乎你的大脑如何接收事物”——年轻人对心理健康和寻求帮助的看法:一项访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18617-4.
2
Identification of health-related problems in youth: a mixed methods feasibility study evaluating the Youth Health Report System.青少年健康相关问题的识别:一项混合方法可行性研究,评估青少年健康报告系统。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02465-8.
3
Development and usability evaluation of an electronic health report form to assess health in young people: a mixed-methods approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of open-ended questionnaires to examine the effects of tinnitus and its relation to patient-reported outcome measures.使用开放式问卷来探讨耳鸣的影响及其与患者报告结局测量的关系。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Jul;61(7):592-599. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1995790. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Suitability for e-health of non-pharmacological interventions in connective tissue diseases: scoping review with a descriptive analysis.结缔组织疾病非药物干预措施的电子健康适用性:描述性分析的范围综述。
RMD Open. 2021 Jul;7(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001710.
3
Staff's experiences of a pilot implementation of the SEXual health Identification Tool for assessing sexual ill health among visitors to Swedish youth clinics: A focus group study.
开发和评估电子健康报告表单以评估年轻人健康状况的使用性:一种混合方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 10;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02191-7.
工作人员对性健康识别工具在评估瑞典青年诊所来访者性健康不良方面的试点实施经验:一项焦点小组研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Sep;29:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100643. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Comparison of YouthCHAT, an Electronic Composite Psychosocial Screener, With a Clinician Interview Assessment for Young People: Randomized Controlled Trial.青少年综合心理社会电子筛查工具YouthCHAT与临床医生访谈评估对青少年的比较:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 3;21(12):e13911. doi: 10.2196/13911.
5
Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research.超越探索性:设计和评估定性健康研究的定制框架。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e030123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123.
6
Youth version, Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool (YouthCHAT): An electronic, psychosocial screener for young people with long-term physical conditions.青少年版病例发现与帮助评估工具(YouthCHAT):一种用于患有长期身体疾病的青少年的电子心理社会筛查工具。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jan;56(1):102-106. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14503. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
PROMIS®: Standardizing the patient voice in health psychology research and practice.PROMIS®:在健康心理学研究和实践中标准化患者声音。
Health Psychol. 2019 May;38(5):343-346. doi: 10.1037/hea0000741.
8
Identifying young people exposed to or at risk of sexual ill health: pilot implementation of an evidence-informed toolkit (SEXIT) at Swedish youth clinics.识别接触性健康不良或有接触性健康不良风险的年轻人:在瑞典青少年诊所试点实施基于证据的工具包(SEXIT)
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Feb;24(1):45-53. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1564815. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
9
Accessibility and factors associated with utilization of mental health services in youth health centers. A qualitative comparative analysis in northern Sweden.青少年健康中心心理健康服务的可及性及相关影响因素:瑞典北部的定性比较分析
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Nov 14;12:69. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0249-4. eCollection 2018.
10
Educating and Training the Future Adolescent Health Workforce.培养未来青少年健康工作队伍。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 May;62(5):511-524. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.299. Epub 2018 Feb 19.