Boccanelli A, Zachara E, Liberatore S M, Carboni G P, Prati P L
Postgrad Med J. 1986;62 Suppl 1:184-7.
In 15 patients with moderate congestive heart failure not completely controlled on digoxin (0.25 mg o.d.) and frusemide (25 mg o.d.), we compared the addition of captopril (12.5 to 50 mg b.i.d.) with increasing doses of frusemide (25 to 100 mg o.d.), in a randomized double-blind, double-dummy, comparative trial. Thirteen patients completed the 3 months study: two dropped-out in the frusemide group. Statistically significant clinical improvement occurred in both treatment groups. Exercise tolerance also significantly improved in both groups in a parallel fashion. Echocardiographic cardiac function data showed a significantly better pattern of changes in the captopril group. The addition of low doses of captopril to basal therapy seems to be as effective as the addition of high doses of frusemide in uncontrolled moderate congestive heart failure. This approach with captopril also appears to be more physiological and safe.
在15例使用地高辛(每日0.25毫克)和速尿(每日25毫克)治疗但中度充血性心力衰竭未得到完全控制的患者中,我们在一项随机双盲、双模拟、对照试验中,比较了加用卡托普利(每次12.5至50毫克,每日两次)与增加速尿剂量(每日25至100毫克)的效果。13例患者完成了为期3个月的研究:速尿组有2例退出。两个治疗组均出现了具有统计学意义的临床改善。两组的运动耐量也以平行方式显著改善。超声心动图心脏功能数据显示,卡托普利组的变化模式明显更好。在未得到控制的中度充血性心力衰竭的基础治疗中,加用低剂量卡托普利似乎与加用高剂量速尿一样有效。使用卡托普利的这种方法似乎也更符合生理且更安全。