• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏护理环境中的跨专业合作:COVID-19 时代的经验。

Interprofessional collaboration in the renal care settings: Experiences in the COVID-19 era.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

Student Scientific Society affiliated with the Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Jul;31(7):749-755. doi: 10.17219/acem/146777.

DOI:10.17219/acem/146777
PMID:35349231
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in healthcare is increasingly emphasized. Due to significant comorbidity in renal patients who require highly specialized procedures, proper IPC is an essential component in renal care. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the existing and proven collaboration mechanisms were put to the test.

OBJECTIVES

To assess IPC in the renal care settings in the era of COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The survey consisted of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II) (3 subscales - partnership, cooperation and coordination, maximum of 5 points), questions about work conditions and factors influencing work during the pandemic, as well as demographic data. The survey was distributed in 8 renal care settings (4 hospital wards with dialysis units and 4 individual dialysis units); 127 participants filled out the survey; 26.8% of participants were physicians, 68.5% nurses and 4.7% other staff members, i.e., administrative assistants. Mean work experience in their current team was 16.8 ±11.7 years among nurses and 11.6 ±9.7 years among physicians.

RESULTS

Interprofessional collaboration was assessed by physicians and nurses, respectively, as follows: partnership 4.03 ±0.79 compared to 3.58 ±0.73 (p = 0.003), cooperation 4.28 ±0.59 compared to 3.71 ±0.72 (p = 0.0002), and coordination 3.83 ±0.87 compared to 3.48 ±0.82 (p = 0.04). The specific workplace did not influence the IPC rates; 49.9% of physicians and 40.1% of nurses agreed or strongly agreed that the collaboration worsened during the pandemic; 47% of physicians and 42.4% of nurses admitted that the communication has significantly deteriorated. An increased level of stress, new procedures and fear of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were, according to the participants, the most significant factors for the worsening of IPC.

CONCLUSIONS

The exceptional circumstances faced during the pandemic have a significant impact on IPC, which may influence patients' satisfaction and safety. An active support for healthcare teams in the field of IPC is especially important in this challenging reality.

摘要

背景

跨专业协作(IPC)在医疗保健中的作用越来越受到重视。由于需要高度专业化治疗的肾脏患者合并症严重,因此适当的 IPC 是肾脏护理的重要组成部分。在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,现有的和经过验证的协作机制经受了考验。

目的

评估 COVID-19 大流行期间肾脏护理环境中的 IPC。

材料和方法

该调查包括《跨专业团队协作评估量表 II(AITCS-II)》(3 个子量表-伙伴关系、合作和协调,最高 5 分),有关工作条件和大流行期间工作影响的问题,以及人口统计学数据。该调查在 8 个肾脏护理环境(4 个带透析单位的医院病房和 4 个独立透析单位)中进行;有 127 名参与者填写了调查;26.8%的参与者是医生,68.5%的参与者是护士,4.7%的参与者是行政助理等其他工作人员。护士在当前团队中的平均工作经验为 16.8 ±11.7 年,医生为 11.6 ±9.7 年。

结果

医生和护士分别评估 IPC 如下:伙伴关系分别为 4.03 ±0.79 和 3.58 ±0.73(p = 0.003),合作分别为 4.28 ±0.59 和 3.71 ±0.72(p = 0.0002),协调分别为 3.83 ±0.87 和 3.48 ±0.82(p = 0.04)。特定的工作场所并没有影响 IPC 水平;49.9%的医生和 40.1%的护士同意或强烈同意在大流行期间合作恶化;47%的医生和 42.4%的护士承认沟通明显恶化。根据参与者的说法,压力增加、新程序和担心感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)是导致 IPC 恶化的最重要因素。

结论

大流行期间的特殊情况对 IPC 产生了重大影响,这可能会影响患者的满意度和安全性。在这一充满挑战的现实中,为医疗团队提供积极的 IPC 支持尤为重要。

相似文献

1
Interprofessional collaboration in the renal care settings: Experiences in the COVID-19 era.肾脏护理环境中的跨专业合作:COVID-19 时代的经验。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Jul;31(7):749-755. doi: 10.17219/acem/146777.
2
Understanding the distinct experience of rural interprofessional collaboration in developing palliative care programs.了解农村跨专业合作在制定姑息治疗计划方面的独特经验。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(2):2711. Epub 2014 May 14.
3
Interprofessional Collaboration in the Context of Pain Management in Neonatal Intensive Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey.跨专业协作在新生儿重症监护疼痛管理中的应用:一项横断面调查。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2022 Dec;23(6):759-766. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
4
Individual-level determinants of interprofessional team collaboration in healthcare.医疗保健中跨专业团队协作的个体层面决定因素。
J Interprof Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):762-767. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1594732. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
5
Examining perceptions from in situ simulation-based training on interprofessional collaboration during crisis event management in post-anesthesia care.审视基于现场模拟训练对麻醉后护理中危机事件管理期间跨专业协作的认知。
J Interprof Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;33(2):182-189. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1538103. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
Interprofessional primary care during COVID-19: a survey of the provider perspective.新冠疫情期间的跨专业初级保健:提供者视角调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Feb 3;22(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01366-9.
7
Interprofessional Team Collaboration and Work Environment Health in 68 US Intensive Care Units.68 家美国重症监护病房中的跨专业团队协作和工作环境健康。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Nov 1;31(6):443-451. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022546.
8
A short report on an interprofessional mobilizer team: innovation and impact during the COVID-19 pandemic.关于跨专业动员团队的简短报告:COVID-19 大流行期间的创新与影响。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):716-718. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1813696. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.跨专业协作:基于实践的干预措施对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2.
10
Care complexity, perceptions of complexity and preferences for interprofessional collaboration: an analysis of relationships and social networks in paediatrics.护理复杂性、对复杂性的认知和对跨专业合作的偏好:对儿科中关系和社会网络的分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05304-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers.新冠疫情期间发表的有偏见、错误和伪造的证据:对撤回的新冠论文的系统评价
Qual Quant. 2022 Nov 29:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01587-3.