KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Mar;46(2):298-308. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2039855. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
To understand if and how physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) use activity-based therapy (ABT) and its associated technologies for the rehabilitation of individuals living with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) in Canadian rehabilitation hospital settings.
Qualitative study.
Through rehabilitation hospitals participating in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry, we recruited licensed OTs and PTs to participate in focus groups.
Twelve PTs and ten OTs from nine sites across eight provinces participated.
To inform the development of a semi-structured interview guide, we used the Theoretical Domains Framework. To analyze the data, we used interpretive description.
We identified three themes that influenced therapists' use of ABT and associated technologies for SCI/D rehabilitation. (1) Therapists' decision-making approach to ABT and technology. Therapist roles, site-specific dynamics and goal setting influenced decision-making. Assuming roles such as mentor, liaison and advocate led to more ABT use. Site-specific dynamics concerned levels of ABT knowledge, teamwork, and staffing. In hospital rehabilitation, there was competition between discharge and neurorecovery goals. (2) Therapist perceived individual factors. Patient factors either increased ( patients' motivation, self-advocacy) or prevented ( mourning period, tolerance) the likelihood that ABT was introduced by therapists. (3) ABT and equipment access. Technology was used for ABT in a variety of ways. Access was affected by visible (e.g. equipment cost) and invisible barriers (e.g. departmental relations).
The use of ABT and its associated technologies in Canadian rehabilitation hospitals is variable. Ongoing education could be offered, and site-specific implementation strategies could be developed, to promote ABT use.
了解加拿大康复医院环境中,物理治疗师(PT)和作业治疗师(OT)是否以及如何使用活动为基础的治疗(ABT)及其相关技术来康复脊髓损伤或疾病(SCI/D)患者。
定性研究。
通过参与里克·汉森脊髓损伤登记处的康复医院,我们招募了持照的 OT 和 PT 参加焦点小组。
来自八个省九个地点的 12 名 PT 和 10 名 OT 参加了研究。
为了制定半结构化访谈指南,我们使用了理论领域框架。为了分析数据,我们使用了解释性描述。
我们确定了三个影响治疗师使用 ABT 和相关技术进行 SCI/D 康复的主题。(1)治疗师对 ABT 和技术的决策方法。治疗师的角色、特定地点的动态和目标设定影响决策。担任导师、联络人和倡导者等角色会导致更多的 ABT 使用。特定地点的动态涉及 ABT 知识、团队合作和人员配备水平。在医院康复中,出院和神经恢复目标之间存在竞争。(2)治疗师感知的个体因素。患者因素要么增加(患者的动机、自我倡导),要么阻止(哀悼期、容忍)治疗师引入 ABT 的可能性。(3)ABT 和设备访问。以各种方式使用技术进行 ABT。访问受到可见(例如设备成本)和不可见(例如部门关系)障碍的影响。
加拿大康复医院中 ABT 及其相关技术的使用情况各不相同。可以提供持续的教育,并制定特定地点的实施策略,以促进 ABT 的使用。