Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Division of Human Communication, Development & Hearing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Jan;27(1):193-202. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2036946. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Computer-use behaviours can provide useful information about an individual's cognitive and functional abilities. However, little research has evaluated unaided and non-directed home computer-use. In this proof of principle study, we explored whether computer-use behaviours recorded during routine home computer-use i) could discriminate between individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI); ii) were associated with cognitive and functional scores; and iii) changed over time.
Thirty-two participants with SCD ( = 18) or MCI ( = 14) (mean age = 72.53 years; female = 19) participated in a longitudinal study in which their in-home computer-use behaviour was passively recorded over 7-9 months. Cognitive and functional assessments were completed at three time points: baseline; mid-point (4.5 months); and end point (month 7 to 9).
Individuals with MCI had significantly slower keystroke speed and spent less time on the computer than individuals with SCD. More time spent on the computer was associated with better task switching abilities. Faster keystroke speed was associated with better visual attention, recall, recognition, task inhibition, and task switching. No significant change in computer-use behaviour was detected over the study period.
Passive monitoring of computer-use behaviour shows potential as an indicator of cognitive abilities, and can differentiate between people with SCD and MCI. Future studies should attempt to monitor computer-use behaviours over a longer time period to capture the onset of cognitive decline, and thus could inform timely therapeutic interventions.
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2036946.
计算机使用行为可以提供有关个体认知和功能能力的有用信息。然而,很少有研究评估未经指导和非定向的家庭计算机使用。在这项原理验证研究中,我们探讨了在常规家庭计算机使用期间记录的计算机使用行为是否:i)可以区分有主观认知下降(SCD)的个体和有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的个体;ii)与认知和功能评分相关;iii)随时间变化。
32 名 SCD( = 18)或 MCI( = 14)参与者(平均年龄=72.53 岁;女性=19)参加了一项纵向研究,在此期间,他们在家中的计算机使用行为被被动记录了 7-9 个月。认知和功能评估在三个时间点完成:基线;中点(4.5 个月);终点(第 7 至 9 个月)。
MCI 个体的按键速度明显较慢,在计算机上花费的时间也少于 SCD 个体。在计算机上花费的时间越多,任务转换能力越好。更快的按键速度与更好的视觉注意力、回忆、识别、任务抑制和任务转换相关。在研究期间未检测到计算机使用行为的显著变化。
被动监测计算机使用行为显示出作为认知能力指标的潜力,并且可以区分 SCD 和 MCI 个体。未来的研究应尝试在更长的时间内监测计算机使用行为,以捕捉认知能力下降的发生,从而可以及时进行治疗干预。
本文的补充数据可在 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2036946 在线获取。