Suppr超能文献

美国活体供肝与死体供肝肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的长期结局。

Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States.

机构信息

From the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Exp Clin Transplant. 2022 Mar;20(3):279-284. doi: 10.6002/ect.2021.0479.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although living donor liver transplant has become a vital treatment option in hepatocellular carcinoma, controversy remains on whether recurrence and survival rates are different versus deceased donor recipients. Here, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between recipients of living and deceased donor liver transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our comparisons used data from the United Network of Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

RESULTS

There were 385 living donor and 25 274 deceased donor liver transplant recipients with diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant list wait times of ≥6 months were more common in deceased donor(55.9%) versus living donor recipients (45.2%; P < .001). Both recipient groups were comparable with regard to alpha-fetoprotein level <200 ng/mL (P = .18). Only a small percentage in both groups had ≥3 total tumors (P = .73); both groups had similar low transplants outside of Milan criteria (P = .45). Overall, 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates for deceased versus living donor recipients were similar (91.2% vs 92%, 74% vs 76.4%, 58.9% vs 56.5%; P = .69). On multivariate analysis, Black/African American race/ethnicity was associated with worse outcomes than White race/ethnicity as reference (P < .001), whereas Hispanic and Asian race/ethnicity were more protected. Hepatitis C virus as liver disease etiology was associated with worse outcomes than other etiologies. Tumor characteristics, ≥3 lesions, tumor size, and higher alpha-fetoprotein levels were associated with worse outcomes. Living donor transplant was not associated with higher hazard of death. Among living donor recipients only, largest tumor size was associated with higher risk of death (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was similarin between the living donor versus deceased donor recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. With changes in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception policies for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States, living donor transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma could expand the donor pool.

摘要

目的

尽管活体供肝移植已成为肝细胞癌的重要治疗选择,但在复发率和生存率方面,它与已故供体受者是否存在差异仍存在争议。在这里,我们比较了美国接受活体和已故供体肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的患者的临床特征和结局。

材料和方法

我们的比较使用了美国器官共享网络/器官获取和移植网络的数据。

结果

共有 385 例活体供肝和 25274 例已故供体肝移植受者诊断为肝细胞癌。已故供体(55.9%)比活体供体(45.2%)受者的移植等待时间≥6 个月更为常见(P<.001)。两组受者的甲胎蛋白水平<200ng/ml(P=0.18)均无差异。两组的肿瘤总数≥3 的比例均较小(P=0.73);两组超出米兰标准的移植均相似(P=0.45)。总体而言,已故供体与活体供体受者的 1 年、5 年和 10 年总生存率相似(91.2%比 92%,74%比 76.4%,58.9%比 56.5%;P=0.69)。多变量分析显示,与白人种族/民族相比,黑人/非裔美国人种族/民族与较差的结局相关(P<.001),而西班牙裔和亚裔种族/民族则受到更多保护。丙型肝炎病毒作为肝病病因与其他病因相比,结局较差。肿瘤特征、≥3 个病灶、肿瘤大小和较高的甲胎蛋白水平与结局较差相关。活体供体移植与较高的死亡风险无关。仅在活体供体受者中,最大肿瘤大小与死亡风险增加相关(P=0.005)。

结论

在患有肝细胞癌的活体供体与已故供体受者之间,生存情况相似。随着美国终末期肝病模型例外政策对肝细胞癌的改变,活体肝移植治疗肝细胞癌可能会扩大供体池。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验