• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植前3天中位终末期肝病模型评分的国家政策对有或无肝细胞癌患者移植肝脏质量的影响

Impact of Median MELD at Transplant Minus 3 National Policy on Quality of Transplanted Livers for Patients With and Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

作者信息

Mazur Rafal D, Cron David C, Chang David C, Yeh Heidi, Dageforde Leigh Anne D

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2024 Jan 1;108(1):204-214. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004621. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000004621
PMID:37189232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10651798/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been overprioritized in the deceased donor liver allocation system. The United Network for Organ Sharing adopted a policy in May 2019 that limited HCC exception points to the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at transplant in the listing region minus 3. We hypothesized this policy change would increase the likelihood to transplant marginal quality livers into HCC patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of a national transplant registry, including adult deceased donor liver transplant recipients with and without HCC from May 18, 2017, to May 18, 2019 (prepolicy) to May 19, 2019, to March 1, 2021 (postpolicy). Transplanted livers were considered of marginal quality if they met ≥1 of the following: (1) donation after circulatory death, (2) donor age ≥70, (3) macrosteatosis ≥30% and (4) donor risk index ≥95th percentile. We compared characteristics across policy periods and by HCC status.

RESULTS

A total of 23 164 patients were included (11 339 prepolicy and 11 825 postpolicy), 22.7% of whom received HCC exception points (prepolicy versus postpolicy: 26.1% versus 19.4%; P = 0.03). The percentage of transplanted donor livers meeting marginal quality criteria decreased for non-HCC (17.3% versus 16.0%; P < 0.001) but increased for HCC (17.7% versus 19.4%; P < 0.001) prepolicy versus postpolicy. After adjusting for recipient characteristics, HCC recipients had 28% higher odds of being transplanted with marginal quality liver independent of policy period (odds ratio: 1.28; confidence interval, 1.09-1.50; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at transplant in the listing region minus 3 policy limited exception points and decreased the quality of livers received by HCC patients.

摘要

背景

在已故供体肝脏分配系统中,肝细胞癌(HCC)患者一直被过度优先考虑。器官共享联合网络于2019年5月采用了一项政策,将HCC例外点数限制为登记地区移植时终末期肝病模型中位数减去3。我们假设这一政策变化会增加将边缘质量肝脏移植给HCC患者的可能性。

方法

这是一项对国家移植登记处的回顾性队列研究,包括2017年5月18日至2019年5月18日(政策实施前)以及2019年5月19日至2021年3月1日(政策实施后)接受和未接受HCC的成年已故供体肝脏移植受者。如果移植肝脏符合以下至少一项标准,则被认为质量边缘:(1)循环死亡后捐赠;(2)供体年龄≥70岁;(3)大脂肪变性≥30%;(4)供体风险指数≥第95百分位数。我们比较了不同政策时期以及有无HCC情况下的特征。

结果

共纳入23164例患者(政策实施前11339例,政策实施后11825例),其中22.7%的患者获得HCC例外点数(政策实施前与政策实施后:26.1%对19.4%;P = 0.03)。符合边缘质量标准的移植供体肝脏百分比在非HCC患者中有所下降(17.3%对16.0%;P < 0.001),但在HCC患者中有所增加(17.7%对19.4%;P < 0.001),政策实施前与政策实施后相比。在调整受者特征后,无论政策时期如何,HCC受者接受边缘质量肝脏移植的几率高28%(优势比:1.28;置信区间,1.09 - 1.50;P <

结论

登记地区移植时终末期肝病模型中位数减去3的政策限制了例外点数,并降低了HCC患者接受肝脏的质量。

相似文献

1
Impact of Median MELD at Transplant Minus 3 National Policy on Quality of Transplanted Livers for Patients With and Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma.移植前3天中位终末期肝病模型评分的国家政策对有或无肝细胞癌患者移植肝脏质量的影响
Transplantation. 2024 Jan 1;108(1):204-214. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004621. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Liver transplantation and waitlist mortality for HCC and non-HCC candidates following the 2015 HCC exception policy change.2015 年 HCC 例外政策变更后,肝移植和 HCC 及非 HCC 候选者的候补名单死亡率。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):564-572. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15144. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
The Impact of Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at Transplant Minus 3 National Policy on Waitlist Outcomes in Patients With and Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma.终末期肝病模型中位数在移植减去 3 全国政策对伴有和不伴有肝细胞癌患者等候名单结果的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Mar;28(3):376-385. doi: 10.1002/lt.26368. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
Impact of major hepatocellular carcinoma policy changes on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.美国主要肝癌政策变化对肝癌肝移植的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Dec;28(12):1857-1864. doi: 10.1002/lt.26509. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era.在终末期肝病模型分配时代,活体捐赠对肝移植受者生存获益的影响。
Hepatology. 2011 Oct;54(4):1313-21. doi: 10.1002/hep.24494.
6
Changing opportunities for liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝癌患者肝移植机会的变化。
Clin Transplant. 2022 May;36(5):e14609. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14609. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
7
The Effect of Acuity Circles on Deceased Donor Transplant and Offer Rates Across Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores and Exception Statuses.急性评估圈对终末期肝病模型评分和例外状态下已故供者移植和供者提出率的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Mar;28(3):363-375. doi: 10.1002/lt.26286. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
Waitlist Outcomes for Exception and Non-exception Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States Following Implementation of the Median MELD at Transplant (MMaT)/250-mile Policy.在美国移植(MMaT)/250 英里政策实施后,根据中位 MELD 在移植时(MMaT)/250 英里政策对例外和非例外肝移植候选者的候补名单结果。
Transplantation. 2024 Aug 1;108(8):e170-e180. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004957. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
9
HCC patients suffer less from geographic differences in organ availability.HCC 患者在器官可及性方面受到的地域差异影响较小。
Am J Transplant. 2013 Nov;13(11):2989-95. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12441. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
10
Significant Reduction in Posttransplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in the Post 6-Mo Waiting Policy Era.6 个月等待政策后肝移植术后肝细胞癌复发显著减少。
Transplantation. 2024 May 1;108(5):1172-1178. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004860. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status of waitlist mortality and transplant probability for adult candidates with chronic end-stage liver disease for deceased donor liver transplantation under the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score-based allocation policy in Japan.在日本基于终末期肝病模型评分的分配政策下,成人慢性终末期肝病候选者接受已故供体肝移植的等待名单死亡率及移植概率的现状。
J Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00535-025-02288-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of major hepatocellular carcinoma policy changes on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.美国主要肝癌政策变化对肝癌肝移植的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Dec;28(12):1857-1864. doi: 10.1002/lt.26509. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Early Impact of MMaT-3 Policy on Liver Transplant Waitlist Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.MMaT-3政策对肝细胞癌肝移植等待名单结果的早期影响
Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 12;8(5):e1313. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001313. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Dynamic impact of liver allocation policy change on donor utilization.肝脏分配政策变化对供体利用的动态影响。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jul;22(7):1901-1908. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17006. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Impact of Portable Normothermic Blood-Based Machine Perfusion on Outcomes of Liver Transplant: The OCS Liver PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial.便携式常温血液机器灌注对肝移植结局的影响:OCS 肝 PROTECT 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Mar 1;157(3):189-198. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6781.
5
The Impact of Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at Transplant Minus 3 National Policy on Waitlist Outcomes in Patients With and Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma.终末期肝病模型中位数在移植减去 3 全国政策对伴有和不伴有肝细胞癌患者等候名单结果的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Mar;28(3):376-385. doi: 10.1002/lt.26368. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
The Effect of Acuity Circles on Deceased Donor Transplant and Offer Rates Across Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores and Exception Statuses.急性评估圈对终末期肝病模型评分和例外状态下已故供者移植和供者提出率的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Mar;28(3):363-375. doi: 10.1002/lt.26286. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
Liver transplantation in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: National and center-level responses.美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的肝移植:国家和中心层面的应对措施。
Am J Transplant. 2021 May;21(5):1838-1847. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16373. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Trends in Outcomes for Marginal Allografts in Liver Transplant.肝移植中边缘供肝的预后趋势
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 5;155(10):926-32. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2484.
9
Outcomes After Declining a Steatotic Donor Liver for Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States.美国拒绝接受脂肪肝供肝的肝移植候选者的预后情况。
Transplantation. 2020 Aug;104(8):1612-1618. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003062.
10
United States liver allocation.美国肝脏分配
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Apr;25(2):104-109. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000740.