Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1270-1283. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13763. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
This study explored children's causal reasoning about the past and future. U.S. adults (n = 60) and 3-to-6-year-olds (n = 228) from an urban, middle-class population (49% female; ~45% white) participated between 2017 and 2019. Participants were told three-step causal stories and asked about the effects of a change to the second event. Given direct interventions on the second event, children of all ages judged that the past event still occurred, suggesting even preschoolers understand time is irreversible. However, children reasoned differently when told that the second event did not occur, with no specific cause. In this case, 6-year-olds and adults inferred that the past event also did not occur. In both conditions, inferences that future events would change emerged gradually between 4 and 6.
本研究探讨了儿童对过去和未来的因果推理。2017 年至 2019 年,美国成年人(n=60)和来自城市中产阶级(49%为女性;~45%为白人)的 3 至 6 岁儿童(n=228)参与了研究。参与者听了三个步骤的因果故事,并被问到第二个事件变化的影响。考虑到对第二个事件的直接干预,所有年龄段的儿童都判断过去的事件仍然发生,这表明即使是学龄前儿童也理解时间是不可逆转的。然而,当被告知第二个事件没有发生且没有具体原因时,儿童的推理方式不同。在这种情况下,6 岁儿童和成年人推断过去的事件也没有发生。在这两种情况下,4 至 6 岁之间逐渐出现了对未来事件将发生变化的推断。