Johnson S C, Solomon G E
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA. susanj+@pitt.edu
Child Dev. 1997 Jun;68(3):404-19.
Three studies examined young children's understanding of the biologically causal role of birth in determining animal properties and species kind identity. In Studies 1 and 2, 4- to 7-year-olds and adults were told stories in which a baby was born to an animal of one species (e.g., a horse) but was adopted and raised by an animal of another species (e.g., a cow). In Study 1, children were asked to judge which parent the baby would resemble on a set of physical properties and beliefs. The majority of children were unable to say that the baby would resemble the birth parent on physical properties but share the beliefs of the adoptive parent. These results indicate that children were not using domain-specific causal understandings to reason about the origins of these properties. In Study 2, however, when asked to explicitly predict the kind of the baby, even 5-year-olds were able to reliably judge that the baby would be of the same species kind as the birth parent rather than the adoptive parent. This result suggests that children do understand at some level that birth determines species kind. Study 3 examined further the extent to which knowledge about birth influenced children's inferences about properties. Five-year-olds were asked to judge whether a baby would share a set of physical and nonphysical properties with its mother or its father. The results showed that children who knew the factual information about where babies come from (i.e., inside mommies' tummies) were more likely to attribute the mother's properties to the baby than the father's, regardless of whether the properties were physical or nonphysical. But this finding was true only if the property of one of the parents was not inherently more desirable or true than that of the other parent. In sum, the results of these 3 studies indicate that knowledge of birth does play a role in children's inferential reasoning, even for 5-year-olds, but that that role is not domain-specific. The implications for children's understanding of biological inheritance are discussed.
三项研究考察了幼儿对出生在决定动物属性和物种身份方面的生物学因果作用的理解。在研究1和研究2中,向4至7岁的儿童及成年人讲述了一些故事,故事中一个婴儿由某一物种的动物(如一匹马)所生,但被另一物种的动物(如一头牛)收养并抚养长大。在研究1中,要求儿童判断这个婴儿在一系列身体特征和信念方面会与哪位父母相似。大多数儿童无法说出婴儿在身体特征上会与亲生父母相似,却会认同养父母的信念。这些结果表明,儿童并非运用特定领域的因果理解来推断这些特征的来源。然而,在研究2中,当被要求明确预测婴儿的物种时,即使是5岁的儿童也能够可靠地判断出婴儿会与亲生父母而非养父母属于同一物种。这一结果表明,儿童在某种程度上确实理解出生决定物种身份。研究3进一步考察了关于出生的知识在多大程度上影响儿童对属性的推断。要求5岁的儿童判断一个婴儿会与其母亲还是父亲共享一系列身体和非身体属性。结果显示,知道婴儿来源的实际信息(即来自妈妈的肚子里)的儿童,更有可能将母亲的属性而非父亲的属性归于婴儿,无论这些属性是身体属性还是非身体属性。但这一发现只有在父母一方的属性并非本质上比另一方更可取或更真实的情况下才成立。总之,这三项研究的结果表明,即使对于5岁的儿童来说,关于出生的知识在其推理中确实起到了作用,但该作用并非特定领域的。文中还讨论了这些结果对儿童理解生物遗传的启示。