First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Yaizu City Hospital, Yaizu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):2105-2113. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02504-w. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Abdominal Veress needle insertion is commonly performed to generate a pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy. Various safety tests are conducted to confirm accurate needle tip positioning into the abdominal cavity. However, these occasionally yield unclear results and do not help directly visualize the peritoneum puncture. We validated a negative pressure-based technique that helps instantly visualize the moment of the Veress needle entry into the abdominal cavity.
This study included 761 patients who underwent laparoscopic hernioplasty between 2003 and 2021 that entailed pneumoperitoneum creation using a Veress needle. They were divided into conventional technique (CON) and negative pressure visualization technique (NPV) groups. The patients were propensity score-matched (1:1) to minimize selection bias. To determine whether the technique gave a clear result to the surgeon and precisely informed the moment of entry, failed entry and emphysematous complications were compared between the groups.
The propensity score-matching yielded 105 pairs in the matched CON and NPV groups. Failed entry did not occur in the NPV group, whereas it occurred in 8 patients (7.6%) in the CON group (p = 0.004). No patient experienced extraperitoneal emphysema in the matched NPV group, whereas 7 patients (6.7%) in the CON group did (p = 0.007). The groups did not differ in the incidence of omental or mesenteric emphysema.
The NPV eliminated the incidence of failed entry and decreased the incidence of extraperitoneal emphysema, indicating that it could simply and adequately inform the moment of needle entry into the abdominal cavity.
在腹腔镜手术中,通常使用腹部威利斯针插入来产生气腹。进行各种安全测试以确认准确的针尖定位到腹腔内。然而,这些测试偶尔会产生不清楚的结果,并且不能直接帮助可视化腹膜穿刺。我们验证了一种基于负压的技术,该技术有助于立即可视化威利斯针进入腹腔的时刻。
本研究包括 2003 年至 2021 年间接受腹腔镜疝修补术的 761 例患者,这些患者在使用威利斯针产生气腹时,使用常规技术(CON)和负压可视化技术(NPV)。他们分为常规技术(CON)和负压可视化技术(NPV)组。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)以最小化选择偏倚。为了确定该技术是否能为外科医生提供清晰的结果,并精确地告知进入时刻,比较了两组之间的进入失败和气肿并发症。
倾向评分匹配产生了 105 对匹配的 CON 和 NPV 组。NPV 组未发生进入失败,而 CON 组有 8 例(7.6%)发生(p=0.004)。在匹配的 NPV 组中,没有患者发生腹膜外气肿,而 CON 组中有 7 例(6.7%)(p=0.007)。两组在网膜或肠系膜气肿的发生率方面没有差异。
NPV 消除了进入失败的发生率,并降低了腹膜外气肿的发生率,表明它可以简单且充分地告知腹部针进入的时刻。