Civil Engineering Department, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(53):79769-79785. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19849-w. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
The primary impediment to adopting the Water, Energy, and Food (WEF) Nexus is a lack of a comprehensive and user-friendly simulation model. According to our search on Google Scholar and the Scopus databank, WEF Nexus studies can be divided into three broad categories: (1) studies about the nexus concept, (2) studies related to nexus modeling and software development, and (3) case studies. Given that the present study's objective is to review various solutions for WEF Nexus modeling and also to prepare a checklist of available models to find a better model for nexus simulation, we excluded papers and studies which were related to the nexus concept. After that, we split up other papers that talked about nexus and software development into (1) integrated and (2) compiled approaches. Then, it was attempted to identify the shortcomings in each approach. It was shown that the existing integrated WEF Nexus models (such as MUSIASEM, NexSym, CLEW, and ANEMI) had some significant drawbacks compared to compiled alternatives. Several of the major shortcomings of existing integrated models include the following: (1) They did not cover all spatial scales; (2) they included only a limited number of interactions across WEF subsystems; and (3) some of these models were unavailable. Therefore, as a general result of the current study, it was shown that compiled approach is generally preferable compared to available integrated models. In this regard, we tried to find the best water simulation models to implement in the nexus concept. We searched for papers about water simulation models and defined water subsystem requirements in the nexus concept. So, we evaluated each water simulation model based on its ability to cover water subsystem requirements. This work illustrates the capability of a suitable water simulation model to be utilized in the nexus concept and provides a holistic checklist to choose the preferred water simulation model based on the needs of each issue.
采用水、能源和粮食(WEF)关联方法的主要障碍是缺乏全面且用户友好的模拟模型。根据我们在 Google Scholar 和 Scopus 数据库上的搜索,WEF 关联方法的研究可以分为三大类:(1)关于关联方法概念的研究,(2)关于关联方法建模和软件开发的研究,以及(3)案例研究。鉴于本研究的目的是回顾各种 WEF 关联方法的建模解决方案,并准备一份可用模型清单,以找到更好的关联模拟模型,我们排除了与关联方法概念相关的论文和研究。之后,我们将其他讨论关联方法和软件开发的论文分为(1)集成方法和(2)编译方法。然后,试图确定每种方法的缺点。结果表明,与编译方法相比,现有的综合 WEF 关联方法(如 MUSIASEM、NexSym、CLEW 和 ANEMI)存在一些重大缺陷。现有的综合模型存在一些主要缺点,包括:(1)它们没有涵盖所有空间尺度;(2)它们只包括 WEF 子系统之间的有限数量的相互作用;(3)其中一些模型不可用。因此,作为本研究的一般结果,表明编译方法通常优于现有的综合模型。在这方面,我们试图找到最好的水模拟模型来在关联方法中实施。我们搜索了关于水模拟模型的论文,并定义了关联方法中水子系统的要求。因此,我们根据每个水模拟模型覆盖水子系统要求的能力对其进行评估。这项工作说明了合适的水模拟模型在关联方法中的应用能力,并提供了一个整体清单,根据每个问题的需求选择首选的水模拟模型。