Shankar Takshak, Kaeley Nidhi, Nagasubramanyam Vempalli, Bahurupi Yogesh, Bairwa Archana, Infimate D J L, Asokan Reshma, Shukla Krishna, Galagali Santosh S
Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Community & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Feb 25;14(2):e22598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22598. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Background and objective Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency and a significant cause of mortality. Risk stratification scores for sepsis can be unsuitable for use in the emergency department (ED) due to their complexity, and an appropriate solution has yet to be found. In this study, the predictive value of the Sepsis Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department (SPEED) score in estimating 28-day mortality was assessed among patients with sepsis presenting to the ED, in order to determine its suitability as an efficient risk stratification system. Materials and methods This was a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at an urban tertiary care center. We included patients presenting to the ED with suspected or confirmed sepsis who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of our study. The patients were evaluated with the following scoring systems on arrival: the SPEED score; Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction (PIRO) score; and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score; the patients were subsequently followed up on the 28th day to record the final outcomes with regard to mortality and discharge rates. Results This study included 127 patients in total. The median age of the study population was 49 years, and the 28-day mortality rate was 50.4%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for the SPEED score for predicting mortality was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.847-0.951). In comparison, the AUROC for MEDS and PIRO scores was 0.857 (95% CI: 0.793-0.92) and 0.895 (95% CI: 0.838-0.951), respectively. Based on the DeLong test, no significant difference was found in the diagnostic performances with respect to these scores. Conclusion The SPEED score is a simple and handy parameter that can be used for the early and appropriate risk stratification of patients with sepsis in the ED.
脓毒症是一种危及生命的医疗急症,也是导致死亡的重要原因。由于脓毒症风险分层评分的复杂性,其可能不适用于急诊科(ED),且尚未找到合适的解决方案。在本研究中,评估了急诊科脓毒症患者评估(SPEED)评分对脓毒症患者28天死亡率的预测价值,以确定其作为有效风险分层系统的适用性。
这是一项在城市三级医疗中心进行的单中心前瞻性观察性研究。我们纳入了到急诊科就诊且符合本研究纳入和排除标准的疑似或确诊脓毒症患者。患者到达时使用以下评分系统进行评估:SPEED评分;易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍(PIRO)评分;以及急诊科脓毒症死亡率(MEDS)评分;随后在第28天对患者进行随访,记录死亡率和出院率方面的最终结果。
本研究共纳入127例患者。研究人群的中位年龄为49岁,28天死亡率为50.4%。SPEED评分预测死亡率的受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积为0.899(95%CI:0.847 - 0.951)。相比之下,MEDS和PIRO评分的AUROC分别为0.857(95%CI:0.793 - 0.92)和0.895(95%CI:0.838 - 0.951)。基于DeLong检验,这些评分在诊断性能方面未发现显著差异。
SPEED评分是一个简单便捷的参数,可用于急诊科脓毒症患者的早期和适当风险分层。