Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Desert Laboratory on Tumamoc Hill, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 25;10:e13179. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13179. eCollection 2022.
Localized disturbances within grasslands alter biological properties and may shift species composition. For example, rare species in established communities may become dominant in successional communities if they exhibit traits well-suited to disturbance conditions. Although the idea that plant species exhibit different trait 'strategies' is well established, it is unclear how ecological selection for specific traits may change as a function of disturbance. Further, there is little data available testing whether disturbances select for single trait-characters within communities (homogenization), or allow multiple trait-types to persist (diversification). We investigated how (a) traits and (b) functional diversity of post-disturbance gap communities compared to those in adjacent undisturbed grasslands, and (c) if altered functional diversity resulted in the homogenization or diversification of functional traits.
Here we emulate the impacts of an extreme disturbance in a native grassland site. We measured plant community composition of twelve paired 50 × 50 cm plots (24 total) in Alberta, Canada. Each pair consisted of one undisturbed plot and one which had all plants terminated 2 years prior. We used species abundances and a local trait database to calculate community weighted means for maximum height, specific leaf area, specific root length, leaf nitrogen percent, and root nitrogen percent. To test the impacts of disturbance on community functional traits, we calculated functional diversity measures and compared them between disturbed and undisturbed communities.
Within 2 years, species richness and evenness in disturbed communities had recovered and was equivalent to undisturbed communities. However, disturbed and undisturbed communities had distinct community compositions, resulting in lower functional divergence in disturbed plots. Further, disturbance was linked to increases in community-weighted mean trait values for resource-acquisitive traits, such as specific leaf area, and leaf and root nitrogen.
Disturbance had lasting effects on the functional traits and diversity of communities, despite traditional biodiversity measures such as richness and evenness recovering within 2 years. The trait space of gap communities shifted compared to undisturbed communities such that gap communities were dominated by traits enhancing resource uptake and growth rates. Overall, these results show that short-term disturbance fundamentally changes the functional character of early-successional communities, even if they superficially appear recovered.
草原内的局部干扰会改变生物特性,并可能改变物种组成。例如,如果在演替群落中,稀有物种表现出适应干扰条件的特征,它们可能会成为优势种。尽管植物物种表现出不同的“策略”这一观点已得到充分证实,但生态选择特定特征的方式如何随干扰而变化尚不清楚。此外,几乎没有数据可用于测试干扰是否会在群落中选择单一特征(同质化),还是允许多种特征类型持续存在(多样化)。我们调查了干扰后间隙群落的(a)特征和(b)功能多样性与相邻未受干扰草原的差异,以及(c)功能多样性的改变是否导致功能特征的同质化或多样化。
在这里,我们模拟了原生草原点极端干扰的影响。我们测量了加拿大艾伯塔省 12 对 50×50 厘米(共 24 个)的配对样地中的植物群落组成。每对由一个未受干扰的样地和一个 2 年前所有植物都被清除的样地组成。我们使用物种丰度和本地特征数据库计算了最大高度、比叶面积、比根长、叶片氮百分比和根氮百分比的群落加权平均值。为了测试干扰对群落功能特征的影响,我们计算了功能多样性指标,并比较了干扰和未干扰群落之间的差异。
在 2 年内,干扰后群落的物种丰富度和均匀度已经恢复,与未受干扰的群落相当。然而,干扰和未干扰的群落具有明显不同的群落组成,导致干扰样地的功能差异较低。此外,干扰与资源获取特征(如比叶面积、叶片和根氮)的群落加权平均特征值的增加有关。
尽管传统的生物多样性指标(如丰富度和均匀度)在 2 年内恢复,但干扰对群落功能特征和多样性仍有持久影响。与未受干扰的群落相比,间隙群落的特征空间发生了变化,使得间隙群落主要由增强资源获取和生长速率的特征主导。总的来说,这些结果表明,即使短期干扰表面上看起来已经恢复,它也会从根本上改变早期演替群落的功能特征。