Ayvazian S G, Ray Nicholas E, Gerber-Williams Anna, Grabbert Sinead, Pimenta Adam, Hancock Boze, Cobb Donald, Strobel Charles, Fulweiler R W
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Science Division, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI 02882.
Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Mall, Boston MA 02215.
Estuaries Coast. 2021 May 1;45:196-212. doi: 10.1007/s12237-021-00954-x.
Recent efforts to quantify biogeochemical and ecological processes in oyster habitats have focused on provision of habitat and regulation of the nitrogen cycle. However, it is unclear how these two processes may interact. In this study, seasonal patterns of habitat use and nitrogen removal from natural oyster beds were quantified for comparison with nearby bare sediment in Green Hill Pond, a temperate coastal lagoon in Rhode Island USA. Relationships were tested between benthic macrofaunal abundance and nitrogen removal via denitrification and burial in sediments. Nitrogen removal by oyster bio-assimilation was quantified and compared with nearby oyster aquaculture. Despite limited differences in habitat use by macrofauna, there were fewer non-oyster benthic organisms (e.g., filter-feeders, detritivores) where oysters were present, possibly due to competition for resources. Additionally, low rugosity of the native oyster beds provided little refuge value for prey. There was a shift from net N removal via denitrification in bare sediments to nitrogen fixation beneath oysters, though this change was not statistically significant (t = 1.201; p = 0.233). Sediments contained low concentrations of N, however sediments beneath oysters contained almost twice as much N (0.07%) as bare sediments (0.04%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in tissue N content between wild oysters and those raised in aquaculture nearby, though caged oysters had more tissue per shell mass and length, and therefore removed more N on a shell length basis. These oyster beds lacked the complex structure of 3-dimensional oyster reefs which may have diminished their ability to provide habitat for refugia, foraging sites for macrofauna, and conditions known to stimulate denitrification.
近期对牡蛎栖息地生物地球化学和生态过程进行量化的努力主要集中在栖息地的提供和氮循环的调节上。然而,尚不清楚这两个过程是如何相互作用的。在本研究中,对美国罗德岛一个温带沿海泻湖——青山池塘中天然牡蛎床的栖息地利用季节模式和氮去除情况进行了量化,以便与附近的裸露沉积物进行比较。测试了底栖大型动物丰度与通过反硝化作用和沉积物掩埋去除氮之间的关系。对牡蛎生物同化作用去除氮的情况进行了量化,并与附近的牡蛎养殖情况进行了比较。尽管大型动物在栖息地利用方面差异有限,但在有牡蛎的地方,非牡蛎底栖生物(如滤食性动物、碎屑食性动物)较少,这可能是由于资源竞争所致。此外,原生牡蛎床的低粗糙度为猎物提供的避难价值不大。在裸露沉积物中,通过反硝化作用去除氮的情况有所转变,变为牡蛎下方的固氮作用,不过这种变化在统计学上并不显著(t = 1.201;p = 0.233)。沉积物中的氮浓度较低,然而牡蛎下方的沉积物含氮量几乎是裸露沉积物的两倍(0.07%)(0.04%;p < 0.001)。野生牡蛎与附近养殖的牡蛎在组织氮含量上没有差异,不过笼养牡蛎每壳质量和长度的组织更多,因此按壳长计算去除的氮更多。这些牡蛎床缺乏三维牡蛎礁的复杂结构,这可能削弱了它们为避难所提供栖息地、为大型动物提供觅食场所以及营造已知能刺激反硝化作用条件的能力。