• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌术后营养支持期间预防和管理高血糖症的胰岛素:中国回顾性队列研究降低并发症。

Insulin for hyperglycemia prevention and management during postgastrectomy nutrition support in gastric cancer: Reduced complications in a retrospective cohort study in China.

机构信息

The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Center for Family Medicine and Integrative Health Care, Beijing United Family Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;31(1):49-56. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202203_31(1).0006.

DOI:10.6133/apjcn.202203_31(1).0006
PMID:35357103
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of insulin addition to the total nutrition admixture (TNA) for glycemic control among patients with gastric cancer (GC) receiving supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN) after gastrectomy.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 208 noncritical ill patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC from 2017 to 2019 at a tertiary teaching hospital in Lanzhou, China. All the included patients received individualized SPN and enteral nutrition treatment after gastrectomy. The patients were randomly divided into insulin and noninsulin groups based on the TNA composition. Blood glucose (BG) measurements, glycemic fluctuation, and hypoglycemia incidence during SPN were compared between the two groups. The postoperative comprehensive complications index (CI) and infections were compared according to insulin regimen and postoperative glycemic status.

RESULTS

The mean BG was significantly lower and fluctuated less in the insulin group than in the noninsulin group (p<0.05). One unit of insulin per 6 g of parenteral nutrition glucose addition to TNA did not increase hypoglycemia incidence (p>0.05). Comparing CI and the infection rate, no significance was observed between the insulin and noninsulin groups, but a higher postoperative CI was observed in patients with hyperglycemia than in euglycemic patients (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate insulin addition to TNA has an overall positive effect on glycemic management in patients with noncritical GC who received SPN after gastrectomy. Postoperative glycemic status was associated with the incidence of relevant complications. Further research is needed for conclusive recommendations.

摘要

背景与目的

评估在胃癌(GC)患者胃切除术后接受补充肠外营养(SPN)时,胰岛素添加到全营养混合液(TNA)中对于血糖控制的效果。

方法和研究设计

这是一项在中国兰州一家三级教学医院进行的回顾性队列研究,共纳入 208 例非危重症 GC 患者,他们于 2017 年至 2019 年期间接受了胃切除术。所有纳入的患者在胃切除术后均接受个体化 SPN 和肠内营养治疗。根据 TNA 组成,将患者随机分为胰岛素组和非胰岛素组。比较两组 SPN 期间的血糖(BG)测量值、血糖波动和低血糖发生率。根据胰岛素方案和术后血糖状态比较术后综合并发症指数(CI)和感染情况。

结果

胰岛素组的平均 BG 明显低于非胰岛素组,且波动较小(p<0.05)。在 TNA 中每 6 克肠外营养葡萄糖添加 1 单位胰岛素不会增加低血糖发生率(p>0.05)。比较 CI 和感染率,胰岛素组和非胰岛素组之间没有差异,但与血糖正常患者相比,高血糖患者的术后 CI 更高(p<0.05)。

结论

在胃切除术后接受 SPN 的非危重症 GC 患者中,适当添加胰岛素到 TNA 对血糖管理具有整体积极作用。术后血糖状态与相关并发症的发生率有关。需要进一步研究以得出明确的建议。

相似文献

1
Insulin for hyperglycemia prevention and management during postgastrectomy nutrition support in gastric cancer: Reduced complications in a retrospective cohort study in China.胃癌术后营养支持期间预防和管理高血糖症的胰岛素:中国回顾性队列研究降低并发症。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;31(1):49-56. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202203_31(1).0006.
2
The Impact and Clinical Prediction of Hyperglycemia During Parenteral Nutrition for Nondiabetic Patients After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.胃癌胃切除术后非糖尿病患者肠外营养期间高血糖的影响及临床预测
Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 14;9:807841. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.807841. eCollection 2022.
3
Intensive Versus Conventional Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes During Enteral Nutrition After Gastrectomy.胃切除术后肠内营养期间糖尿病患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1553-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2871-7. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
4
Glargine Insulin Use Versus Continuous Regular Insulin in Diabetic Surgical Noncritically Ill Patients Receiving Parenteral Nutrition: Randomized Controlled Study.甘精胰岛素与常规胰岛素在接受肠外营养的糖尿病非危重症外科患者中的应用比较:随机对照研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Sep;41(7):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/0148607116644710. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
5
Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy in nondiabetic patients receiving parenteral nutrition after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.接受胃癌 D2 胃切除术后肠外营养的非糖尿病患者中强化与常规胰岛素治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Nov;15(11):1961-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1654-z. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
6
Pilot study of the SPRINT glycemic control protocol in a Hungarian medical intensive care unit.匈牙利某医疗重症监护病房中强化血糖控制方案(SPRINT)的初步研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 1;6(6):1464-77. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600628.
7
Glycemic control for postoperative pediatric cardiac patients.小儿心脏术后患者的血糖控制
Pediatr Cardiol. 2009 Nov;30(8):1098-104. doi: 10.1007/s00246-009-9512-4. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
8
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
9
THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERGLYCEMIA IN NONCRITICALLY ILL HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS TREATED WITH CONTINUOUS ENTERAL OR PARENTERAL NUTRITION.非危重症住院患者在接受连续肠内或肠外营养治疗时的高血糖管理。
Endocr Pract. 2018 Oct 2;24(10):900-906. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0150. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Effectiveness of regular versus glargine insulin in stable critical care patients receiving parenteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial.在接受肠外营养的稳定重症监护患者中,常规胰岛素与甘精胰岛素的有效性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Feb;35(2):148-57. doi: 10.1002/phar.1546.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Contributing to Blood Glucose Elevation Associated With Olanzapine Used as an Antiemetic During Cancer Chemotherapy.在癌症化疗期间,奥氮平用作止吐药导致血糖升高的相关因素。
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):902-908. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13894.