School of Nursing, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA.
Fam Pract. 2022 Sep 24;39(5):964-970. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac026.
Collaborative care models (CCMs) have robust research evidence in improving mental health outcomes for diverse patient populations with complex health care needs. However, the impact of CCMs on primary care provider (PCP) outcomes are not well described.
This integrative review synthesizes the evidence regarding the effect of mental health CCMs on PCP outcomes.
PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were systematically searched using key terms, with inclusion criteria of English language, peer-reviewed literature, primary care setting, PCP outcomes, and mental health CCM. This resulted in 1,481 total records, with an additional 14 records identified by review of reference lists. After removal of duplicates, 1,319 articles were reviewed based on title and abstract, 190 full-text articles were assessed, and a final selection of 15 articles were critically appraised and synthesized.
The articles included a wide variety of sample sizes, designs, settings, and patient populations, with most studies demonstrating low or moderate quality evidence. Although CCMs had an overwhelmingly positive overall effect on PCP outcomes such as knowledge, satisfaction, and self-efficacy, multiple logistical barriers were also identified that hindered CCM implementation such as time and workflow conflicts. Adaptability of the CCM as well as PCP enthusiasm enhanced positive outcomes. Newer-to-practice PCPs were more likely to participate in CCM initiatives.
Accumulating evidence supports CCM expansion, to improve both patient and PCP outcomes. Logistical efforts may enhance CCM adaptability and workflow. Further studies are needed to specifically examine the effect of CCMs on PCP burnout and retention.
协作式护理模式(CCMs)在改善具有复杂医疗需求的多样化患者群体的心理健康结果方面具有强大的研究证据。然而,CCMs 对初级保健提供者(PCP)结果的影响尚未得到很好的描述。
本综述综合了有关心理健康 CCM 对 PCP 结果影响的证据。
使用关键词系统地搜索了 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 PsycInfo,纳入标准为英语、同行评议文献、初级保健环境、PCP 结果和心理健康 CCM。这导致总共 1481 条记录,通过审查参考文献又确定了 14 条记录。去除重复项后,根据标题和摘要对 1319 篇文章进行了回顾,评估了 190 篇全文文章,并对最终选择的 15 篇文章进行了批判性评估和综合。
这些文章的样本量、设计、设置和患者群体多种多样,大多数研究的证据质量为低或中。尽管 CCM 对 PCP 结果(如知识、满意度和自我效能感)产生了压倒性的积极影响,但也确定了许多实施 CCM 的实际障碍,例如时间和工作流程冲突。CCM 的适应性以及 PCP 的积极性增强了积极的结果。较新实践的 PCP 更有可能参与 CCM 计划。
越来越多的证据支持 CCM 的扩展,以改善患者和 PCP 的结果。后勤工作可能会增强 CCM 的适应性和工作流程。需要进一步的研究来专门研究 CCM 对 PCP 倦怠和保留的影响。