文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

直接作用抗病毒药物治疗老年丙型肝炎病毒患者(≥65 岁)的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus in elderly patients (≥65 years old): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea.

Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2022 Jul;29(7):496-517. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13679. Epub 2022 Apr 6.


DOI:10.1111/jvh.13679
PMID:35357774
Abstract

Direct-acting agents (DAAs) have launched a new era of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. As aged individuals comprise a large percentage of HCV-infected patients, the effectiveness and safety of DAAs in the elderly have come under scrutiny. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAAs in elderly patients. After a systematic search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, OVID MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and other databases, two investigators reviewed relevant abstracts and selected manuscripts for examination. The sustained virologic response (SVR) and adverse event (AE) rates were calculated with a random-effects model. Ninety studies evaluating SVR rates of elderly patients (≥65 years old) receiving DAAs were selected. DAAs in elderly patients exhibited a notable SVR rate of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95%-97%), accompanied by comparable rates in subgroup analyses. The comparison of SVR rates in elderly and non-elderly patients indicated no significant discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01). The overall event rate of AEs was 45% (95% CI: 31%-60%), though AE rates varied by subgroups. Furthermore, AEs were comparatively more frequent (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.28) in the elderly than non-elderly, especially in subgroups such as SAE (OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.52-2.36) and dose reduction in ribavirin (OR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.53-2.36). However, in the ribavirin (RBV)-free regimen, there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the elderly and non-elderly groups. DAAs have high efficacy in elderly patients. Considering the possibility of AE, the RBV-free regimen should be given prior consideration for the treatment of elderly patients with HCV.

摘要

直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)开创了丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的新纪元。由于老年患者在 HCV 感染患者中占很大比例,因此 DAA 在老年患者中的有效性和安全性受到了关注。本荟萃分析旨在评估 DAA 在老年患者中的疗效和安全性。我们在 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase、OVID MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和其他数据库中进行了系统检索,两位研究者对相关摘要和入选文献进行了评估。我们使用随机效应模型计算持续病毒学应答(SVR)和不良事件(AE)的发生率。我们共纳入了 90 项评估 DAA 治疗老年(≥65 岁)患者 SVR 率的研究。老年患者 DAA 治疗的 SVR 率高达 96%(95%置信区间 [CI]:95%-97%),亚组分析结果一致。老年和非老年患者 SVR 率的比较无显著差异(比值比 [OR] 1.01,95% CI:1.00-1.01)。AE 的总体发生率为 45%(95% CI:31%-60%),但不同亚组间的发生率存在差异。此外,与非老年患者相比,老年患者的 AE 发生率更高(OR 1.15,95% CI:1.04-1.28),特别是在严重不良事件(OR 1.89,95% CI:1.52-2.36)和减少利巴韦林剂量(OR 1.90,95% CI:1.53-2.36)亚组中。然而,在无利巴韦林(RBV)方案中,老年和非老年患者的 AE 发生率无显著差异。DAA 对老年患者具有较高的疗效。鉴于 AE 的可能性,对于 HCV 老年患者的治疗,应优先考虑无 RBV 方案。

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus in elderly patients (≥65 years old): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Viral Hepat. 2022-7

[2]
Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liver Int. 2019-5-15

[3]
Effectiveness, safety and clinical outcomes of direct-acting antiviral therapy in HCV genotype 1 infection: Results from a Spanish real-world cohort.

J Hepatol. 2017-2-9

[4]
Identification of the Best Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimen for Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 3 Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016-11-10

[5]
A systematic review with meta-analysis: Is ribavirin necessary in sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapies for patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation?

Int J Infect Dis. 2019-4-5

[6]
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection and compensated cirrhosis: An integrated safety and efficacy analysis.

Hepatology. 2015-5-9

[7]
Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients eligible for shortened treatment, re-treatment or in HCV/HIV co-infection: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2011-4

[8]
Evolution of eGFR in chronic HCV patients receiving sofosbuvir-based or sofosbuvir-free direct-acting antivirals.

J Hepatol. 2020-5

[9]
Treatment outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving sofosbuvir-based combination therapy within national hepatitis C elimination program in the country of Georgia.

BMC Infect Dis. 2020-1-10

[10]
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/+Dasabuvir±Ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r/+DSV±RBV) Therapy in Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 Infection Post-Liver Transplant: AMBER-CEE Study.

Ann Transplant. 2017-4-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
I Can C Clearly Now, the End Is Near.

Dig Dis Sci. 2025-1

[2]
The Impact of the G6PD Gene Mutations in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Treated with Direct-Acting Antivirals: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Genes (Basel). 2024-8-24

[3]
The prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes and factors associated with cirrhosis, fatty liver, and viral load: A registry-based cross-sectional cohort study in Western Iran during 1999-2023.

Health Sci Rep. 2024-9-22

[4]
Liver Stiffness Values to Predict Occurrence and Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Life (Basel). 2024-3-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索