• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态系统服务规模技术评估海洋垃圾清除的效益。

Ecosystem-Service Scaling Techniques to Evaluate the Benefits of Marine Debris Removal.

机构信息

Enduring Econometrics, 1455 NW Leary Way Ste. 400, Seattle, WA, 98107, United States.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Program Analysis Branch, 1335 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2022 Jul;70(1):64-78. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01636-5. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-022-01636-5
PMID:35359239
Abstract

While knowledge of the ecological impacts of marine debris is continually advancing, methods to evaluate the comparative scale of these impacts are less well developed. In the case of costly environmental restoration in marine and coastal environments, quantifying and comparing the ecological impacts of diverse forms of ecosystem injuries can facilitate a more efficient selection of restoration projects. This article proposes evaluating marine debris removal projects in an ecological service equivalency analysis framework that can be used to compare marine debris removal to other types of environmental restoration. Drawing on existing spatial and temporal data with respect to marine debris impacts on habitats and resources, we demonstrate how resource managers and organizations involved in marine debris removal can quantify the ecological service benefits of a removal project and use it to comparatively select between projects based on present value ecological benefits. This valuation can be useful in natural resource damage assessment restoration selection, and for directing limited funds to marine debris removal projects which produce the greatest gains in ecological services. This ecological scaling framework is applied to a seagrass injury case study to demonstrate its application for scaling marine debris removal as compensatory restoration.

摘要

虽然人们对海洋垃圾的生态影响的认识在不断提高,但评估这些影响的相对规模的方法却不太完善。在海洋和沿海环境进行昂贵的环境恢复的情况下,量化和比较不同形式的生态系统损伤的生态影响,可以更有效地选择恢复项目。本文提出了在生态服务等效性分析框架中评估海洋垃圾清除项目的方法,该方法可用于将海洋垃圾清除与其他类型的环境恢复进行比较。本文利用现有的关于海洋垃圾对栖息地和资源影响的时空数据,展示了资源管理者和参与海洋垃圾清除的组织如何量化清除项目的生态服务效益,并根据现值生态效益在项目之间进行比较选择。这种评估在自然资源损害评估、恢复选择以及将有限的资金用于产生最大生态效益的海洋垃圾清除项目方面都很有用。该生态尺度框架应用于海草损伤案例研究,以展示其在将海洋垃圾清除作为补偿性恢复进行尺度扩展方面的应用。

相似文献

1
Ecosystem-Service Scaling Techniques to Evaluate the Benefits of Marine Debris Removal.生态系统服务规模技术评估海洋垃圾清除的效益。
Environ Manage. 2022 Jul;70(1):64-78. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01636-5. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Restoration Scaling Approaches to Addressing Ecological Injury: The Habitat-Based Resource Equivalency Method.恢复性尺度方法解决生态损伤:基于生境的资源等效性方法。
Environ Manage. 2020 Feb;65(2):161-177. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01245-9. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Ecosystems, ecological restoration, and economics: does habitat or resource equivalency analysis mean other economic valuation methods are not needed?生态系统、生态恢复与经济学:生境或资源等效性分析是否意味着不需要其他经济估值方法?
Ambio. 2013 Sep;42(5):628-43. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0351-9. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
4
Spatial cost-benefit analysis of blue restoration and factors driving net benefits globally.蓝藻水华治理的空间成本效益分析及全球净效益驱动因素。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Dec;35(6):1850-1860. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13742. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Inclusion of condition in natural capital assessments is critical to the implementation of marine nature-based solutions.将条件纳入自然资本评估对于海洋自然解决方案的实施至关重要。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 2):156026. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156026. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Refining the use of habitat equivalency analysis.优化栖息地等效性分析的应用
Environ Manage. 2007 Jul;40(1):161-70. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0361-0. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
7
Lost ecosystem services as a measure of oil spill damages: a conceptual analysis of the importance of baselines.丧失的生态系统服务作为衡量溢油损害的指标:基线重要性的概念分析。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 May 25.
8
Leveraging co-production within ecosystem restoration to maximize benefits to coastal birds.利用生态系统恢复中的共同生产来最大化对沿海鸟类的益处。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121093. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121093. Epub 2024 May 11.
9
Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.补救后对生态资源造成的风险主要可能是由于成功恢复后资源价值的增加:以美国能源部汉福德场址为例。
Environ Res. 2020 Jul;186:109536. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109536. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Calculating resource restoration for an oil discharge in Lake Barre, Louisiana, USA.计算美国路易斯安那州巴雷湖石油泄漏的资源恢复情况。
Environ Manage. 2002 May;29(5):691-702. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0059-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning Up without Messing Up: Maximizing the Benefits of Plastic Clean-Up Technologies through New Regulatory Approaches.清洁无乱:通过新的监管方法最大限度地发挥塑料清理技术的效益。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 12;57(36):13304-13312. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01885. Epub 2023 Aug 28.