Bhatti Amit Ashok, Mahajan Niranjan P, Vyas Devashish Dhiren, Shah Mudasir Mushtaq, Huded Vikram
Interventional Neurology and Stroke, Narayana Institute of Neurosciences, NH Health City, Bommasandra, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):885-890. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_87_21. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
Recanalization failure rate in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusions is up to 30%. Outcome greatly depends on recanalization success and, thus, there is an urgent need to adopt new strategies to improve recanalization.
To report on the feasibility, safety, and outcome of rescue strategies (stenting and/or angioplasty) in cases of failed MT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in anterior circulation.
It was a retrospective observational study where patients undergoing MT were divided into two groups. The first group (MT-only) was of patients who had undergone only MT with the standard tools (stentriever and/or aspiration). The second group (MT-plus) consisted of patients who underwent a rescue procedure after failure of the standard MT. The two groups were compared based on the demographics, risk factors, stroke severity, and the extent of infarct on imaging. The angiographic findings, procedural details, periprocedural care, and angiographic and clinical outcome were also compared.
Out of 181 cases, 142 were in MT-only while 39 were included in MT-plus group. The two groups had comparable baseline stroke severity, extent of infarct on imaging and door to puncture time. The MT-plus patients had significantly longer time of onset and puncture to recanalization time. The clinical outcome was favorable in both groups with 57.7% and 59% patients achieving mRS 0-2 in MT-only and MT-plus groups, respectively. Successful recanalization was achieved in 80.3% and 89.7% in MT-only and MT-plus groups, respectively. There was no significant increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality after rescue procedures.
Rescue stenting and/or angioplasty after failed MT is a safe and effective recanalization method for AIS in anterior circulation without increasing mortality or morbidity.
大血管闭塞的机械取栓术(MT)再通失败率高达30%。治疗结果很大程度上取决于再通是否成功,因此,迫切需要采用新策略来提高再通率。
报告在前循环急性缺血性卒中(AIS)机械取栓失败病例中采用补救策略(支架置入和/或血管成形术)的可行性、安全性和治疗结果。
这是一项回顾性观察研究,接受机械取栓的患者被分为两组。第一组(单纯机械取栓组)患者仅使用标准工具(取栓支架和/或抽吸)进行机械取栓。第二组(机械取栓加补救组)由标准机械取栓失败后接受补救治疗的患者组成。根据人口统计学、危险因素、卒中严重程度和影像学上的梗死范围对两组进行比较。还比较了血管造影结果、手术细节、围手术期护理以及血管造影和临床结果。
181例患者中,142例在单纯机械取栓组,39例纳入机械取栓加补救组。两组在基线卒中严重程度、影像学上的梗死范围和门到穿刺时间方面具有可比性。机械取栓加补救组患者的发病时间和穿刺到再通时间明显更长。两组的临床结果均良好,单纯机械取栓组和机械取栓加补救组分别有57.7%和59%的患者改良Rankin量表评分达到0 - 2分。单纯机械取栓组和机械取栓加补救组的成功再通率分别为80.3%和89.7%。补救治疗后症状性颅内出血和死亡率没有显著增加。
机械取栓失败后进行补救性支架置入和/或血管成形术是前循环AIS安全有效的再通方法,不会增加死亡率或发病率。