• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者间接转运至导管室与死亡率相关,与系统延误无关:来自法国PCI注册研究的见解

Indirect Transfer to Catheterization Laboratory for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Is Associated With Mortality Independent of System Delays: Insights From the France-PCI Registry.

作者信息

Beygui Farzin, Roule Vincent, Ivanes Fabrice, Dechery Thierry, Bizeau Olivier, Roussel Laurent, Dequenne Philippe, Arnould Marc-Antoine, Combaret Nicolas, Collet Jean Philippe, Commeau Philippe, Cayla Guillaume, Montalescot Gilles, Benamer Hakim, Motreff Pascal, Angoulvant Denis, Marcollet Pierre, Chassaing Stephan, Blanchart Katrien, Koning René, Rangé Grégoire

机构信息

Cardiology Department, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.

Cardiology Department, CHU de Tours, Tours, France.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 11;9:793067. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.793067. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.793067
PMID:35360033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8962625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

First medical contact (FMC)-to-balloon time is associated with outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We assessed the impact on mortality and the determinants of indirect vs. direct transfer to the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL).

METHODS

We analyzed data from 2,206 STEMI patients consecutively included in a prospective multiregional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. The primary endpoint was 1-year mortality. The impact of indirect admission to CCL on mortality was assessed using Cox models adjusted on FMC-to-balloon time and covariables unequally distributed between groups. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed determinants of indirect transfer.

RESULTS

A total of 359 (16.3%) and 1847 (83.7%) were indirectly and directly admitted for PCI. Indirect admission was associated with higher risk features, different FMCs and suboptimal pre-PCI antithrombotic therapy.At 1-year follow-up, 51 (14.6%) and 137 (7.7%) were dead in the indirect and direct admission groups, respectively (adjusted-HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.22-2.45). The association of indirect admission with mortality was independent of pre-FMC and FMC characteristics. Older age, paramedics- and private physician-FMCs were independent determinants of indirect admission (adjusted-HRs 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.003-1.03; 5.94, 95% CI 5.94 3.89-9.01; 3.41; 95% CI 1.86-6.2, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that, indirect admission to PCI for STEMI is associated with 1-year mortality independent of FMC to balloon time and should be considered as an indicator of quality of care. Indirect admission is associated with higher-risk features and suboptimal antithrombotic therapy. Older age, paramedics-FMC and self-presentation to a private physician were independently associated with indirect admission. Our study, supports population education especially targeting elderly, more adequately dispatched FMC and improved pre-CCL management.

摘要

背景

首次医疗接触(FMC)至球囊扩张时间与ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的预后相关。我们评估了其对死亡率的影响以及间接与直接转运至心脏导管实验室(CCL)的决定因素。

方法

我们分析了前瞻性多区域经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)登记中连续纳入的2206例STEMI患者的数据。主要终点为1年死亡率。使用根据FMC至球囊扩张时间及组间分布不均的协变量进行调整的Cox模型评估间接入住CCL对死亡率的影响。多变量逻辑回归模型评估间接转运的决定因素。

结果

共有359例(16.3%)和1847例(83.7%)分别间接和直接入住接受PCI治疗。间接入住与更高风险特征、不同的FMC以及PCI前抗栓治疗欠佳相关。在1年随访时,间接入住组和直接入住组分别有51例(14.6%)和137例(7.7%)死亡(校正风险比1.73;95%可信区间1.22 - 2.45)。间接入住与死亡率的关联独立于FMC前和FMC特征。年龄较大、急救人员和私人医生进行的FMC是间接入住的独立决定因素(每年校正风险比分别为1.02,95%可信区间1.003 - 1.03;5.94,95%可信区间3.89 - 9.01;3.41,95%可信区间1.86 - 6.2)。

结论

我们的研究表明,STEMI患者间接入住接受PCI治疗与1年死亡率相关,独立于FMC至球囊扩张时间,应被视为医疗质量的一个指标。间接入住与更高风险特征和欠佳的抗栓治疗相关。年龄较大、急救人员进行的FMC以及自行前往私人医生处就诊与间接入住独立相关。我们的研究支持针对老年人开展人群教育、更合理地派遣FMC以及改善CCL前管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/9c96eed0ef6b/fcvm-09-793067-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/294c047d89ad/fcvm-09-793067-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/2003e4bb50cd/fcvm-09-793067-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/9c96eed0ef6b/fcvm-09-793067-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/294c047d89ad/fcvm-09-793067-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/2003e4bb50cd/fcvm-09-793067-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdc/8962625/9c96eed0ef6b/fcvm-09-793067-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Indirect Transfer to Catheterization Laboratory for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Is Associated With Mortality Independent of System Delays: Insights From the France-PCI Registry.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者间接转运至导管室与死亡率相关,与系统延误无关:来自法国PCI注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 11;9:793067. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.793067. eCollection 2022.
2
[Evidence-based management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2010].[ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的循证管理。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)2010年最新指南]
Herz. 2010 Dec;35(8):558-64. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3401-8.
3
[Impact of symptom onset to first medical contact time on the prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[症状发作至首次医疗接触时间对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 May 24;45(5):393-398. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.05.006.
4
Performance analysis of a STEMI network: prognostic impact of the type of first medical contact facility.ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)网络的性能分析:首次医疗接触机构类型的预后影响。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023 Sep;76(9):708-718. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
Direct Admission Versus Interhospital Transfer for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.直接入院与院间转运对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):438-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.028. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Early ST elevation myocardial infarction in non-capable percutaneous coronary intervention centres: in situ fibrinolysis vs. percutaneous coronary intervention transfer.非有能力行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心的早期 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:就地溶栓与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗转院。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Apr 1;37(13):1034-40. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv619. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Delay from first medical contact to primary PCI and all-cause mortality: a nationwide study of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.从首次医疗接触到直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的延迟与全因死亡率:一项针对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的全国性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Mar 4;3(2):e000486. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000486.
8
Clinical predictors of patient related delay in the VIENNA ST-elevation myocardial infarction network and impact on long-term mortality.维也纳ST段抬高型心肌梗死网络中患者相关延迟的临床预测因素及其对长期死亡率的影响。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Apr;6(3):254-261. doi: 10.1177/2048872616633882. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Impact on mortality of direct admission versus interhospital transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接入院与院间转运对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响。
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep;38(9):621-631. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
On versus off-hour care of patients with acute coronary syndrome and persistent ST-segment elevation in certified German chest pain units.德国认证胸痛中心急性冠状动脉综合征和持续性ST段抬高患者的非工作时间与工作时间护理情况对比
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Feb;6(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/2048872615624845. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of inter-hospital transfer versus direct admission for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational study of 25,315 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction from the London Heart Attack Group.院内转院与直接入院行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的结局影响:来自伦敦心肌梗死研究组的 25315 例患者的观察性研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):948-957. doi: 10.1177/2048872619882340. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Impact on mortality of direct admission versus interhospital transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接入院与院间转运对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响。
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep;38(9):621-631. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Does helicopter transport delay prehospital transfer for STEMI patients in rural areas? Findings from the CRAC France PCI registry.直升机转运是否会延迟农村地区 STEMI 患者的院前转运?来自法国 CRAC PCI 登记处的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):958-965. doi: 10.1177/2048872619848976. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
4
Sex Differences Persist in Time to Presentation, Revascularization, and Mortality in Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.性别差异在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心肌梗死患者的就诊时间、血运重建和死亡率方面仍然存在。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e012161. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012161.
5
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
6
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
7
The CRAC cohort model: A computerized low cost registry of interventional cardiology with daily update and long-term follow-up.CRAC队列模型:一种每日更新且长期随访的介入心脏病学低成本计算机化注册系统。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018 May;66(3):209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.01.135. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
8
The efficacy of early versus delayed P2Y12 inhibition in percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期与延迟 P2Y12 抑制对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2018 May 20;14(1):78-85. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00852.
9
Trends and predictors of prehospital delay in patients undergoing primary coronary intervention.接受直接冠状动脉介入治疗患者的院前延误趋势及预测因素。
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Aug;29(5):373-377. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000608.
10
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.