Costentin Charlotte, Piñero Federico, Degroote Helena, Notarpaolo Andrea, Boin Ilka F, Boudjema Karim, Baccaro Cinzia, Podestá Luis G, Bachellier Philippe, Ettorre Giuseppe Maria, Poniachik Jaime, Muscari Fabrice, Dibenedetto Fabrizio, Duque Sergio Hoyos, Salame Ephrem, Cillo Umberto, Marciano Sebastian, Vanlemmens Claire, Fagiuoli Stefano, Burra Patrizia, Van Vlierberghe Hans, Cherqui Daniel, Lai Quirino, Silva Marcelo, Rubinstein Fernando, Duvoux Christophe
Grenoble Alpes University, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Research Center UGA/Inserm U 1209/CNRS 5309, Grenoble, France.
Gastroenterology, Hepatology and GI Oncology Department, Digidune, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, La Tronche, France.
JHEP Rep. 2022 Feb 2;4(5):100445. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100445. eCollection 2022 May.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are selected for liver transplantation (LT) based on pre-LT imaging ± alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) level, but discrepancies between pre-LT tumour assessment and explant are frequent. Our aim was to design an explant-based recurrence risk reassessment score to refine prediction of recurrence after LT and provide a framework to guide post-LT management.
Adult patients who underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2018 for HCC in 47 centres were included. A prediction model for recurrence was developed using competing-risk regression analysis in a European training cohort (TC; n = 1,359) and tested in a Latin American validation cohort (VC; n=1,085).
In the TC, 76.4% of patients with HCC met the Milan criteria, and 89.9% had an AFP score of ≤2 points. The recurrence risk reassessment (R3)-AFP model was designed based on variables independently associated with recurrence in the TC (with associated weights): ≥4 nodules (sub-distribution of hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.88, 1 point), size of largest nodule (3-6 cm: SHR = 1.83, 1 point; >6 cm: SHR = 5.82, 5 points), presence of microvascular invasion (MVI; SHR = 2.69, 2 points), nuclear grade >II (SHR = 1.20, 1 point), and last pre-LT AFP value (101-1,000 ng/ml: SHR = 1.57, 1 point; >1,000 ng/ml: SHR = 2.83, 2 points). Wolber's c-index was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80), significantly superior to an R3 model without AFP (0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.79; = 0.01). Four 5-year recurrence risk categories were identified: very low (score = 0; 5.5%), low (1-2 points; 15.1%), high (3-6 points; 39.1%), and very high (>6 points; 73.9%). The R3-AFP score performed well in the VC (Wolber's c-index of 0.78; 95% CI 0.73-0.83).
The R3 score including the last pre-LT AFP value (R3-AFP score) provides a user-friendly, standardised framework to design post-LT surveillance strategies, protocols, or adjuvant therapy trials for HCC not limited to the Milan criteria.
NCT03775863.
Considering discrepancies between pre-LT tumour assessment and explant are frequent, reassessing the risk of recurrence after LT is critical to further refine the management of patients with HCC. In a large and international cohort of patients who underwent transplantation for HCC, we designed and validated the R3-AFP model based on variables independently associated with recurrence post-LT (number of nodules, size of largest nodule, presence of MVI, nuclear grade, and last pre-LT AFP value). The R3-AFP model including last available pre-LT AFP value outperformed the original R3 model only based on explant features. The final R3-AFP scoring system provides a robust framework to design post-LT surveillance strategies, protocols, or adjuvant therapy trials, irrespective of criteria used to select patients with HCC for LT.
肝细胞癌(HCC)患者基于肝移植前影像学检查±甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平被选择进行肝移植(LT),但肝移植前肿瘤评估与切除标本之间的差异很常见。我们的目的是设计一种基于切除标本的复发风险重新评估评分系统,以优化肝移植后复发的预测,并提供一个指导肝移植后管理的框架。
纳入2000年至2018年期间在47个中心因HCC接受移植的成年患者。在欧洲训练队列(TC;n = 1359)中使用竞争风险回归分析开发复发预测模型,并在拉丁美洲验证队列(VC;n = 1085)中进行测试。
在TC中,76.4%的HCC患者符合米兰标准,89.9%的患者AFP评分为≤2分。复发风险重新评估(R3)-AFP模型基于与TC中复发独立相关的变量(及其相关权重)设计:≥4个结节(风险比亚分布[SHR]=1.88,1分)、最大结节大小(3 - 6 cm:SHR = 1.83,1分;>6 cm:SHR = 5.82,5分)、微血管侵犯(MVI)的存在(SHR = 2.69,2分)、核分级>II(SHR = 1.20,1分)以及肝移植前最后一次AFP值(101 - 1000 ng/ml:SHR = 1.57,1分;>1000 ng/ml:SHR = 2.83,2分)。Wolber's c指数为0.76(95%CI 0.72 - 0.80),显著优于不含AFP的R3模型(0.75;95%CI 0.72 - 0.79;P = 0.01)。确定了四个5年复发风险类别:极低(评分=0;5.5%)、低(1 - 2分;15.1%)、高(3 - 6分;39.1%)和极高(>6分;73.9%)。R3 - AFP评分在VC中表现良好(Wolber's c指数为0.78;95%CI 0.73 - 0.83)。
包括肝移植前最后一次AFP值的R3评分(R3 - AFP评分)提供了一个用户友好的标准化框架,用于设计不限于米兰标准的HCC肝移植后监测策略、方案或辅助治疗试验。
NCT03775863。
鉴于肝移植前肿瘤评估与切除标本之间的差异很常见,重新评估肝移植后复发风险对于进一步优化HCC患者的管理至关重要。在一个大型国际HCC移植患者队列中,我们基于与肝移植后复发独立相关的变量(结节数量、最大结节大小、MVI的存在、核分级以及肝移植前最后一次AFP值)设计并验证了R3 - AFP模型。包含肝移植前最后可用AFP值的R3 - AFP模型优于仅基于切除标本特征的原始R3模型。最终的R3 - AFP评分系统提供了一个强大的框架,用于设计肝移植后监测策略、方案或辅助治疗试验,而不考虑用于选择HCC患者进行肝移植的标准。