NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY (L.R.K.).
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (J.W.).
Stroke. 2022 Aug;53(8):2441-2448. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037974. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
In patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), it is unclear whether early neurological deterioration, hematoma expansion (HE), and outcome vary by supratentorial ICH location (deep versus lobar). Herein, we assessed these relationships in a clinical trial cohort that underwent brain imaging early after symptom onset. We hypothesized that HE would occur more frequently, and outcome would be worse in patients with deep ICH.
We performed a post hoc analysis of the FAST (Factor-VII-for-Acute-Hemorrhagic-Stroke-Treatment) trial including all patients with supratentorial hemorrhage. Enrolled patients underwent brain imaging within 3 hours of symptom onset and 24 hours after randomization. Multivariable regression was used to test the association between ICH location and 3 outcomes: HE (increase of ≥33% or 6mL), early neurological deterioration (decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥2 points or increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥4 points within 24 hours of admission), and 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale).
Of 841 FAST trial patients, we included 728 (mean age 64 years, 38% women) with supratentorial hemorrhages (deep n=623, lobar n=105). HE (44 versus 27%, =0.001) and early neurological deterioration (31 versus 17%, =0.001) were more common in lobar hemorrhages. Deep hemorrhages were smaller than lobar hemorrhages at baseline (12 versus 35mL, <0.001) and 24 hours (14 versus 38mL, <0.001). Unadjusted 90-day outcome was worse in lobar compared with deep ICH (median modified Rankin Scale score 5 versus 4, =0.03). However, when adjusting for variables included in the ICH score including ICH volume, deep location was associated with worse and lobar location with better outcome (odds ratio lobar location, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38-0.89]; =0.01).
In this secondary analysis of randomized trial patients, lobar ICH location was associated with larger ICH volume, more HE and early neurological deterioration, and worse outcome than deep ICH. After adjustment for prognostic variables, however, deep ICH was associated with worse outcome, likely due to their proximity to eloquent brain structures.
在颅内出血(ICH)患者中,尚不清楚早期神经恶化、血肿扩大(HE)和结局是否因幕上ICH 位置(深部与脑叶)而异。在此,我们在一项临床试验队列中评估了这些关系,该队列在症状发作后早期进行了脑部成像。我们假设深部 ICH 患者的 HE 更常见,结局更差。
我们对 FAST(Factor-VII-for-Acute-Hemorrhagic-Stroke-Treatment)试验进行了事后分析,纳入了所有幕上出血患者。入组患者在症状发作后 3 小时内和随机分组后 24 小时内进行脑部成像。多变量回归用于检验 ICH 位置与 3 个结局之间的关系:HE(增加≥33%或 6mL)、早期神经恶化(入院后 24 小时内格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分下降≥2 分或美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分增加≥4 分)和 90 天结局(改良 Rankin 量表)。
在 841 例 FAST 试验患者中,我们纳入了 728 例(平均年龄 64 岁,38%为女性)幕上出血患者(深部 623 例,脑叶 105 例)。脑叶出血的 HE(44%比 27%,=0.001)和早期神经恶化(31%比 17%,=0.001)更为常见。基线时(12 比 35mL,<0.001)和 24 小时时(14 比 38mL,<0.001)深部血肿均小于脑叶血肿。未调整的 90 天结局在脑叶出血中比深部 ICH 更差(中位数改良 Rankin 量表评分 5 比 4,=0.03)。然而,当调整 ICH 评分中包括的变量(包括 ICH 体积)时,深部位置与较差的结局相关,而脑叶位置与较好的结局相关(脑叶位置的优势比,0.58 [95%CI,0.38-0.89];=0.01)。
在这项随机试验患者的二次分析中,与深部 ICH 相比,脑叶 ICH 位置与更大的 ICH 体积、更多的 HE 和早期神经恶化以及更差的结局相关。然而,在调整预后变量后,深部 ICH 与更差的结局相关,这可能是由于其靠近功能区脑结构。