• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

22-23 周出生的婴儿积极治疗是否与同一医院更成熟婴儿的结局相关?对加利福尼亚州新生儿重症监护病房数据的分析,2015-2019 年。

Does active treatment in infants born at 22-23 weeks correlate with outcomes of more mature infants at the same hospital? An analysis of California NICU data, 2015-2019.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94306, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2022 Oct;42(10):1301-1305. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01381-x. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1038/s41372-022-01381-x
PMID:35361887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9522931/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether hospital rates of active treatment for infants born at 22-23 weeks is associated with survival of infants born at 24-27 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

We included all liveborn infants 22-27 weeks of gestation delivered at California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative hospitals from 2015 to 2019. We assessed (1) the correlation of active treatment (e.g., endotracheal intubation, epinephrine) in 22-23 week infants and survival until discharge for 24-27 week infants and (2) the association of active treatment with survival using multilevel models.

RESULT

The 22-23 week active treatment rate was associated with infant outcomes at 22-23 weeks but not 24-27 weeks. A 10% increase in active treatment did not relate to 24-25 week (adjusted OR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.95-1.05]), or 26-27 week survival (aOR: 1.02 [0.95-1.09]).

CONCLUSION

The hospital rate of active treatment for infants born at 22-23 weeks was not associated with improved survival for 24-27 week infants.

摘要

目的

研究 22-23 周出生婴儿的积极治疗率是否与 24-27 周出生婴儿的存活率相关。

研究设计

我们纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年在加利福尼亚围产期质量协作医院出生的所有 22-27 周的活产婴儿。我们评估了(1)22-23 周婴儿的积极治疗(例如气管内插管、肾上腺素)与 24-27 周婴儿的出院存活率之间的相关性,以及(2)使用多层次模型评估积极治疗与存活率之间的关系。

结果

22-23 周的积极治疗率与 22-23 周婴儿的婴儿结局相关,但与 24-27 周婴儿的结局无关。积极治疗增加 10%与 24-25 周(调整后的 OR:1.00[95%CI:0.95-1.05])或 26-27 周的存活率(aOR:1.02[0.95-1.09])无关。

结论

22-23 周出生婴儿的医院积极治疗率与 24-27 周出生婴儿的存活率提高无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd2b/9522931/74739a4dd5e4/nihms-1791921-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd2b/9522931/cf4675dce1a5/nihms-1791921-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd2b/9522931/74739a4dd5e4/nihms-1791921-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd2b/9522931/cf4675dce1a5/nihms-1791921-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd2b/9522931/74739a4dd5e4/nihms-1791921-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Does active treatment in infants born at 22-23 weeks correlate with outcomes of more mature infants at the same hospital? An analysis of California NICU data, 2015-2019.22-23 周出生的婴儿积极治疗是否与同一医院更成熟婴儿的结局相关?对加利福尼亚州新生儿重症监护病房数据的分析,2015-2019 年。
J Perinatol. 2022 Oct;42(10):1301-1305. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01381-x. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Eliminating Risk of Intubation in Very Preterm Infants with Noninvasive Cardiorespiratory Support in the Delivery Room and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.在产房和新生儿重症监护病房使用无创心肺支持消除极早产儿插管风险。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 13;2019:5984305. doi: 10.1155/2019/5984305. eCollection 2019.
3
Survival Among Infants Born at 22 or 23 Weeks' Gestation Following Active Prenatal and Postnatal Care.22 或 23 孕周出生婴儿在积极产前和产后护理后的生存情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jul 1;170(7):671-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0207.
4
Perinatal factors associated with active intensive treatment at the border of viability: a population-based study.与生存边界处积极强化治疗相关的围产期因素:一项基于人群的研究。
J Perinatol. 2015 Sep;35(9):705-11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.48. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Active Treatment of Infants Born at 22-25 Weeks of Gestation in California, 2011-2018.加利福尼亚州 2011-2018 年 22-25 孕周出生婴儿的积极治疗。
J Pediatr. 2022 Oct;249:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
6
Hospital variation and risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a population-based cohort.基于人群的队列研究中医院变异与支气管肺发育不良的危险因素。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Feb;169(2):e143676. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3676. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth.根据出生医院的新生儿护理水平统计低出生体重儿的死亡率。
Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):745-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.745.
8
Survival and outcome of very low birth weight infants born in a university hospital with level II NICU.在一家设有二级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的大学医院出生的极低出生体重儿的生存情况及预后
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Jul;90(7):1323-9.
9
Outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants between 1982 and 1988.1982年至1988年间极低出生体重儿的结局。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 14;321(24):1642-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912143212405.
10
Covariation of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-Level Patent Ductus Arteriosus Management and In-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Outcomes Following Preterm Birth.新生儿重症监护病房级别动脉导管未闭管理与早产儿出生后新生儿重症监护病房内结局的相关性。
J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:225-233.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
An Immature Science: Intensive Care for Infants Born at ≤23 Weeks of Gestation.一门尚不成熟的科学:对妊娠≤23周出生婴儿的重症监护
J Pediatr. 2021 Jun;233:16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
2
Survival Without Major Morbidity Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants in California.加州极低出生体重婴儿无重大并发症存活率。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jul;146(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3865. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Factors Associated With Maternal and Neonatal Interventions at the Threshold of Viability.与极早产儿产妇和新生儿干预相关的因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1398-1408. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003875.
4
Assessment of an Updated Neonatal Research Network Extremely Preterm Birth Outcome Model in the Vermont Oxford Network.评估新生儿研究网络(Neonatal Research Network)更新的极早产儿结局模型在佛蒙特州牛津网络(Vermont Oxford Network)中的应用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 May 1;174(5):e196294. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6294. Epub 2020 May 4.
5
Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.极早产儿围产期护理强度与较高胎龄时的结局:来自EPIPAGE-2队列研究的证据
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jan 7;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1856-1.
6
Covariation of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-Level Patent Ductus Arteriosus Management and In-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Outcomes Following Preterm Birth.新生儿重症监护病房级别动脉导管未闭管理与早产儿出生后新生儿重症监护病房内结局的相关性。
J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:225-233.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Obstetric Care consensus No. 6: Periviable Birth.产科保健共识 6:极早产儿分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e187-e199. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002352.
8
Inhaled nitric oxide use in preterm infants in California neonatal intensive care units.加利福尼亚新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿吸入一氧化氮的使用情况。
J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):635-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.49. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants.极早产儿治疗及预后的医院间差异
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1801-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1410689.
10
Implementation methods for delivery room management: a quality improvement comparison study.产房管理的实施方法:一项质量改进比较研究。
Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):e1378-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0863. Epub 2014 Oct 20.