• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估新生儿研究网络(Neonatal Research Network)更新的极早产儿结局模型在佛蒙特州牛津网络(Vermont Oxford Network)中的应用。

Assessment of an Updated Neonatal Research Network Extremely Preterm Birth Outcome Model in the Vermont Oxford Network.

机构信息

Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2020 May 1;174(5):e196294. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6294. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6294
PMID:32119065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7052789/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) extremely preterm birth outcome model is widely used for prognostication by practitioners caring for families expecting extremely preterm birth. The model provides information on mean outcomes from 1998 to 2003 and does not account for substantial variation in outcomes among US hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

To update and validate the NRN extremely preterm birth outcome model for most extremely preterm infants in the United States.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prognostic study included 3 observational cohorts from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016, at 19 US centers in the NRN (derivation cohort) and 637 US centers in Vermont Oxford Network (VON) (validation cohorts). Actively treated infants born at 22 weeks' 0 days' to 25 weeks' 6 days' gestation and weighing 401 to 1000 g, including 4176 in the NRN for 2006 to 2012, 45 179 in VON for 2006 to 2012, and 25 969 in VON for 2013 to 2016, were studied. VON cohorts comprised more than 85% of eligible US births. Data analysis was performed from May 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Predictive variables used in the original model, including infant sex, birth weight, plurality, gestational age at birth, and exposure to antenatal corticosteroids.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was death before discharge. Secondary outcomes included neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 26 months' corrected age and measures of hospital resource use (days of hospitalization and ventilator use).

RESULTS

Among 4176 actively treated infants in the NRN cohort (48% female; mean [SD] gestational age, 24.2 [0.8] weeks), survival was 63% vs 62% among 3702 infants in the era of the original model (47% female; mean [SD] gestational age, 24.2 [0.8] weeks). In the concurrent (2006-2012) VON cohort, survival was 66% among 45 179 actively treated infants (47% female; mean [SD] gestational age, 24.1 [0.8] weeks) and 70% among 25 969 infants from 2013 to 2016 (48% female; mean [SD] gestational age, 24.1 [0.8] weeks). Model C statistics were 0.74 in the 2006-2012 validation cohort and 0.73 in the 2013-2016 validation cohort. With the use of decision curve analysis to compare the model with a gestational age-only approach to prognostication, the updated model showed a predictive advantage. The birth hospital contributed equally as much to prediction of survival as gestational age (20%) but less than the other factors combined (60%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

An updated model using well-known factors to predict survival for extremely preterm infants performed moderately well when applied to large US cohorts. Because survival rates change over time, the model requires periodic updating. The hospital of birth contributed substantially to outcome prediction.

摘要

重要性

Eunice Kennedy Shriver 国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络 (NRN) 极早产结局模型被广泛用于为期待极早产的家庭提供预后。该模型提供了 1998 年至 2003 年的平均结果信息,并未考虑到美国医院之间结局的显著差异。

目的

为美国大多数极早产儿更新和验证 NRN 极早产结局模型。

设计、地点和参与者: 本预后研究纳入了 1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间来自美国 NRN 的 19 个中心的 3 个观察队列(推导队列)和 Vermont Oxford Network (VON) 的 637 个中心(验证队列)。研究包括 22 周零 0 天至 25 周零 6 天出生、体重 401 至 1000g 的积极治疗婴儿,NRN 中有 4176 例(2006 年至 2012 年),VON 中有 45179 例(2006 年至 2012 年),VON 中有 25969 例(2013 年至 2016 年)。VON 队列包含了超过 85%的美国合格分娩。数据分析于 2017 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日进行。

暴露因素

原始模型中使用的预测变量包括婴儿性别、出生体重、多胎、出生时的胎龄和产前皮质类固醇暴露。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结局是出院前死亡。次要结局包括校正后 18 至 26 个月的神经发育障碍以及医院资源使用的测量(住院天数和呼吸机使用)。

结果

在 NRN 队列中的 4176 例积极治疗婴儿中(48%为女性;平均[SD]胎龄为 24.2[0.8]周),生存率为 63%,而原始模型时期(47%为女性;平均[SD]胎龄为 24.2[0.8]周)的 3702 例婴儿中为 62%。在同期(2006-2012 年)的 VON 队列中,45179 例积极治疗婴儿的生存率为 66%(47%为女性;平均[SD]胎龄为 24.1[0.8]周),2013 年至 2016 年的 25969 例婴儿的生存率为 70%(48%为女性;平均[SD]胎龄为 24.1[0.8]周)。2006-2012 年验证队列的模型 C 统计量为 0.74,2013-2016 年验证队列为 0.73。通过使用决策曲线分析将该模型与仅基于胎龄的预后方法进行比较,更新后的模型显示出了预测优势。分娩医院对生存率的预测贡献与胎龄相当(20%),但低于其他因素的总和(60%)。

结论和相关性

使用众所周知的因素来预测极早产儿的生存率的更新模型在应用于大型美国队列时表现良好。由于生存率随时间变化,因此模型需要定期更新。分娩医院对结局预测有很大的贡献。

相似文献

1
Assessment of an Updated Neonatal Research Network Extremely Preterm Birth Outcome Model in the Vermont Oxford Network.评估新生儿研究网络(Neonatal Research Network)更新的极早产儿结局模型在佛蒙特州牛津网络(Vermont Oxford Network)中的应用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 May 1;174(5):e196294. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6294. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Mortality, In-Hospital Morbidity, Care Practices, and 2-Year Outcomes for Extremely Preterm Infants in the US, 2013-2018.美国 2013-2018 年极早产儿的死亡率、住院期间发病率、护理实践和 2 年结局。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):248-263. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23580.
3
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants Fed Donor Milk or Preterm Infant Formula: A Randomized Clinical Trial.极早产儿喂养捐赠母乳或早产儿配方奶粉的神经发育结局:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 20;331(7):582-591. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27693.
4
Association of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes and Neonatal Morbidities of Extremely Premature Infants With Differential Exposure to Antenatal Steroids.极早产儿不同产前类固醇暴露与神经发育结局及新生儿发病率的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12):1164-1172. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1936.
5
Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants With Birth Weight Less Than 400 g.出生体重低于 400 克的极早产儿的结局。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):434-445. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0180.
6
Deaths in a Modern Cohort of Extremely Preterm Infants From the Preterm Erythropoietin Neuroprotection Trial.《早产儿促红细胞生成素神经保护试验中一个现代极早产儿队列的死亡情况》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46404.
7
Association of Antenatal Steroid Exposure With Survival Among Infants Receiving Postnatal Life Support at 22 to 25 Weeks' Gestation.产前类固醇暴露与 22 至 25 孕周接受新生儿生命支持的婴儿生存的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3235.
8
Chorioamnionitis and early childhood outcomes among extremely low-gestational-age neonates.绒毛膜羊膜炎与极低出生体重儿的早期儿童结局。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Feb;168(2):137-47. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4248.
9
Neonatal outcomes of preterm or very-low-birth-weight infants over a decade from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong: comparison with the Vermont Oxford Network.香港玛丽医院十年来早产或极低出生体重婴儿的新生儿结局:与佛蒙特牛津网络的比较。
Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Aug;23(4):381-6. doi: 10.12809/hkmj166064. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
Association of Antenatal Corticosteroids With Mortality, Morbidity, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Multiple Gestation Infants.产前使用皮质类固醇与极早早产多胎妊娠婴儿的死亡率、发病率及神经发育结局的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jun 1;170(6):593-601. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0104.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Medicaid Data Accurately Reflect the Expenditures and Outcomes for Extremely Premature Infants?医疗补助数据能否准确反映极早产儿的支出及治疗结果?
J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2025 May 19;17:200150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200150. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Predicting death and survival without major morbidity for extremely preterm infants using information on hospital admission: a multicenter cohort study.利用入院时信息预测极早产儿无严重并发症的死亡和生存情况:一项多中心队列研究
Transl Pediatr. 2025 May 30;14(5):927-938. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-33. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Early Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.极低出生体重儿早期严重脑室内出血风险预测模型的构建与验证
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):e70037. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.70037. Epub 2025 May 19.
4
Healthcare professionals interpersonal variability and determinants of medical decision thresholds for active management of extremely preterm infants in a level 3 perinatal center in France.法国一家三级围产期中心医疗保健专业人员在极早产儿积极管理中的人际差异及医疗决策阈值的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 3;20(4):e0320900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320900. eCollection 2025.
5
Outcomes of extremely preterm infants exposed to prolonged prelabor rupture of membranes before 24 weeks of gestation.孕24周前胎膜早破时间延长的极早产儿的结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan 10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.010.
6
Value of autopsy in the modern age: Discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnoses.现代尸检的价值:临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异
World J Exp Med. 2024 Dec 20;14(4):95147. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.95147.
7
Inter-center variations in inpatient outcomes for infants with gastroschisis from the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium.儿童医院新生儿联盟中腹裂婴儿住院结局的中心间差异。
J Perinatol. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02160-6.
8
Association of a Count of Inpatient Morbidities with 2-Year Outcomes among Infants Born Extremely Preterm.极早产儿住院发病率计数与2年预后的关联
J Pediatr. 2025 Mar;278:114428. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114428. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
9
Need for national guidance regarding proactive care of infants born at 22-23 weeks' gestation.需要针对妊娠22 - 23周出生婴儿的积极护理制定国家指导方针。
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2025 Jan;68(1):53-61. doi: 10.3345/cep.2024.01277. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
10
Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation.平衡生存与痛苦:围产儿咨询后影响父母决策的因素
J Perinatol. 2024 Nov 9. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02166-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Untapped potential of multicenter studies: a review of cardiovascular risk prediction models revealed inappropriate analyses and wide variation in reporting.多中心研究的未开发潜力:对心血管风险预测模型的综述揭示了分析不当和报告差异巨大的问题。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Feb 22;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0046-9. eCollection 2019.
2
Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU.新生儿重症监护病房决策中的伦理问题
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801063.
3
Selection Bias and Outcomes for Preterm Neonates.早产新生儿的选择偏倚与结局
Pediatrics. 2018 Jul(142):1. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0470. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Noninvasive blood tests for fetal development predict gestational age and preterm delivery.非侵入性胎儿发育血液检测可预测胎龄和早产。
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1133-1136. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3819.
5
Prognosis as an Intervention.作为一种干预手段的预后
Clin Perinatol. 2018 Jun;45(2):231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Obstetric Care consensus No. 6: Periviable Birth.产科保健共识 6:极早产儿分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e187-e199. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002352.
7
Variation in Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the United States.美国新生儿重症监护病房的表现差异。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Mar 6;171(3):e164396. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4396.
8
Population-Based Outcomes Data for Counseling at the Margin of Gestational Viability.基于人群的孕龄临界期咨询结局数据。
J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;181:208-212.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
9
Does ignoring clustering in multicenter data influence the performance of prediction models? A simulation study.忽略多中心数据中的聚类是否会影响预测模型的性能?一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1723-1736. doi: 10.1177/0962280216668555. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
Reporting Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Births.极低出生体重儿的报告结果
Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0689. Epub 2016 Aug 11.