• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从被撤回论文中学习:高度引用的与伊朗有关联的研究人员的反思——重新审视研究政策和向科睿唯安传递的重要信息

Learning from Retracted Papers Authored by the Highly Cited Iran-affiliated Researchers: Revisiting Research Policies and a Key Message to Clarivate Analytics.

机构信息

Department of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Apr 1;28(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00368-3.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-022-00368-3
PMID:35362834
Abstract

Reasons underlying retractions of papers authored by the Iran-affiliated highly cited researchers (HCRs) have not been documented. Here, we report that 229 of the Iran-affiliated researchers were listed by the Clarivate Analytics as HCRs. We investigated the Retraction Watch Database and found that, in total, 51 papers authored by the Iran-affiliated HCRs were retracted from 2006 to 2019. Twenty-three of the 229 HCRs (10%) had at least one paper retracted. One of the listed HCRs had 22 papers retracted; 14 of the 23 (60.8%) had only one paper retracted. Among the 51 retracted papers, three had been authored by two female authors. Eight (16.8%) retracted papers had international co-authorships. The shortest and longest times from publication to retraction were 20 and 2610 (mean ± SD, 857 ± 616) days, respectively. Of the 51 papers, 43 (84%) had a single reason for retraction, whereas eight had multiple reasons. Among the 43 papers, 23 (53%) were retracted due to fake peer-review, eight (19%) were duplications, six (14%) had errors, four (9%) had plagiarism, and two (5%) were labelled as "limited or no information." Duplication of data, which is easily preventable, amounted to 27%. Any publishing oversight committed by an HCR may not be tolerated because they represent the stakeholders of the scientific literature and stand as role-models for other peer researchers. Future policies supporting the Iranian academia should radically change by implementation of educational and awareness programs on publishing ethics to reduce the rate of retractions in Iran.

摘要

伊朗系高引研究人员(HCRs)发表的论文被撤稿的原因尚不清楚。在这里,我们报告称,有 229 名伊朗系研究人员被科睿唯安列为 HCRs。我们调查了撤稿观察数据库,发现从 2006 年到 2019 年,共有 51 篇由伊朗系 HCRs 撰写的论文被撤稿。在 229 名 HCRs 中,有 23 名(10%)至少有一篇论文被撤稿。其中一名被列出的 HCR 有 22 篇论文被撤稿;23 名(60.8%)中有 14 名只有一篇论文被撤稿。在这 51 篇被撤稿的论文中,有 3 篇是由两名女性作者撰写的。有 8 篇(16.8%)被撤稿的论文有国际合著者。从发表到撤稿的最短和最长时间分别为 20 天和 2610 天(平均值±标准差,857±616 天)。在这 51 篇论文中,有 43 篇(84%)只有一个撤稿原因,而有 8 篇有多个原因。在这 43 篇论文中,有 23 篇(53%)是因为虚假同行评审而被撤稿,8 篇(19%)是重复发表,6 篇(14%)是错误,4 篇(9%)是抄袭,2 篇(5%)是“信息有限或无”。数据重复是很容易预防的,占 27%。HCR 犯下的任何出版失误都不应被容忍,因为他们代表着科学文献的利益相关者,是其他同行研究人员的榜样。为了降低伊朗的撤稿率,未来支持伊朗学术界的政策应该通过实施出版伦理教育和意识项目来彻底改变。

相似文献

1
Learning from Retracted Papers Authored by the Highly Cited Iran-affiliated Researchers: Revisiting Research Policies and a Key Message to Clarivate Analytics.从被撤回论文中学习:高度引用的与伊朗有关联的研究人员的反思——重新审视研究政策和向科睿唯安传递的重要信息
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Apr 1;28(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00368-3.
2
Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers.抄袭、虚假同行评审和重复发表:与伊朗相关的科学论文撤稿的主要原因
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3455-3463. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00274-6. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
3
Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.兽医和动物健康领域撤回文章的综合分析。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Feb 18;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03167-x.
4
Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals.被撤稿的生物医学文献在开放获取期刊上发表。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):855-868. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
Characteristics of Retracted Publications From Kazakhstan: An Analysis Using the Retraction Watch Database.从哈萨克斯坦撤回的出版物的特征:使用撤回观察数据库进行的分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 27;38(46):e390. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e390.
6
An Analysis of Retracted Articles with Authors or Co-authors from the African Region: Possible Implications for Training and Awareness Raising.非洲地区作者或合著者撤稿文章分析:对培训和提高认识的可能影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Dec;15(5):478-493. doi: 10.1177/1556264620955110. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
An analysis of retractions of dental publications.对牙科出版物撤回的分析。
J Dent. 2018 Dec;79:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
8
Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future.撤回的妇产科文献:从过去吸取教训,改变未来。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review.论文工厂对学术研究诚信的威胁:快速范围综述。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;41(7):2241-2248. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06198-9. Epub 2022 May 6.
10
Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.不当行为作为撤稿的主要原因。对撤稿出版物及其作者的描述性研究。
Gac Sanit. 2019 Jul-Aug;33(4):356-360. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers.ChatGPT对科学论文的被动贡献。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Nov;51(11):2340-2350. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03260-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7.