Suppr超能文献

远程立体电子效应在吡咯烷酮和己内酰胺取代的苯酚中:电化学氧化和 H-原子转移反应评估的抗氧化性能差异。

Remote Stereoelectronic Effects in Pyrrolidone- and Caprolactam-Substituted Phenols: Discrepancies in Antioxidant Properties Evaluated by Electrochemical Oxidation and H-Atom Transfer Reactivity.

机构信息

N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, 119991 Moscow Russia.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

J Org Chem. 2022 Apr 15;87(8):5371-5384. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00207. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Abstract

New antioxidants are commonly evaluated via two main approaches, i.e., the ability to donate an electron and the ability to intercept free radicals. We compared these approaches by evaluating the properties of 11 compounds containing both antioxidant moieties (mono- and polyphenols) and auxiliary pharmacophores (pyrrolidone and caprolactam). Several common antioxidants, such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), 2,3,5-trimethylphenol (TMP), quercetin, and dihydroquercetin, were added for comparison. The antioxidant properties of these compounds were determined by their rates of reaction with 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical and their oxidation potentials from cyclic voltammetry. Although these methods test different chemical properties, their results correlate reasonably well. However, several exceptions exist where the two methods give opposite predictions! One of them is the different behavior of mono- and polyphenols: polyphenols can react with DPPH more than an order of magnitude faster than monophenols of a similar oxidation potential. The second exception stems from the size of a "bystander" lactam ring at the benzylic position. Although the phenols with a seven-membered lactam ring are harder to oxidize, the sterically nonhindered compounds react with DPPH about 2× faster than the analogous five-membered lactams. The limitations of computational methods, especially those based on a single parameter, are also evaluated and discussed.

摘要

新的抗氧化剂通常通过两种主要方法进行评估,即捐赠电子的能力和拦截自由基的能力。我们通过评估含有抗氧化剂部分(单酚和多酚)和辅助药效团(吡咯烷酮和己内酰胺)的 11 种化合物的性质来比较这些方法。还添加了几种常见的抗氧化剂,如丁基羟基甲苯 (BHT)、2,3,5-三甲基苯酚 (TMP)、槲皮素和二氢槲皮素,进行比较。这些化合物的抗氧化性质通过它们与 2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼基 (DPPH) 自由基的反应速率和循环伏安法的氧化电位来确定。虽然这些方法测试不同的化学性质,但它们的结果相关性很好。然而,存在一些例外情况,两种方法给出了相反的预测!其中之一是单酚和多酚的不同行为:多酚与 DPPH 的反应速度比具有相似氧化电位的单酚快一个数量级以上。第二个例外源于苄位“旁观者”内酰胺环的大小。尽管具有七元内酰胺环的酚类化合物更难氧化,但无空间位阻的化合物与 DPPH 的反应速度比类似的五元内酰胺快约 2 倍。还评估和讨论了计算方法的局限性,特别是基于单个参数的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验