• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过死亡证明追溯提高基于人群的癌症登记处的数据有效性:阿根廷的具体经验

Improving Data Validity at Population-Based Cancer Registry through Trace-Back of Death Certificates: A Concrete Experience in Argentina.

作者信息

Koch Adriana, Diumenjo Maria, Laspada Walter, Soerjomataram Isabelle, Pineros Marion

出版信息

J Registry Manag. 2020 Summer;47(2):32-36.

PMID:35363669
Abstract

The validity of data provided by population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) is a key aspect in cancer surveillance. Tracing back cases initially reported by death certificate or death-certificate-notified (DCN) cases, improves data quality and has an especially significant impact on survival estimates. The present study performed in the Mendoza PBCR describes the trace-back procedure of cancer cases notified by death certificate for selected cancers (liver, lung, and stomach cancers) with the aim of reducing the percentage of cases diagnosed by death certificate only (DCO). The study was performed in 2018 using cancers diagnosed between 2006 and 2012 in the framework of a survival project (SURVCAN-3). Among the 822 cases that have been traced back, only 32.1% had an identified source of information. Of these, 70.3% had medical records available for review. Of the reviewed medical records, 86.9% of cancer diagnoses were confirmed. The DCN and DCO cases were much higher among older age groups. With the trace-back, the overall percentage of DCO was reduced from 23.8% to 19.9%. We conclude that DCN trace-back could improve data quality by reducing DCO diagnoses, which directly impacts survival estimates. Trace-back should be performed routinely and in a timely manner.

摘要

基于人群的癌症登记处(PBCRs)提供的数据有效性是癌症监测的一个关键方面。追溯最初通过死亡证明报告的病例或死亡证明通知(DCN)病例,可提高数据质量,对生存估计有特别重大的影响。在门多萨PBCR进行的本研究描述了对选定癌症(肝癌、肺癌和胃癌)通过死亡证明通知的癌症病例的追溯程序,目的是减少仅通过死亡证明诊断的病例(DCO)的百分比。该研究于2018年进行,使用了2006年至2012年在一个生存项目(SURVCAN-3)框架内诊断的癌症病例。在已追溯的822例病例中,只有32.1%有确定的信息来源。其中,70.3%有可供审查的医疗记录。在审查的医疗记录中,86.9%的癌症诊断得到证实。DCN和DCO病例在老年人群中要高得多。通过追溯,DCO的总体百分比从23.8%降至19.9%。我们得出结论,DCN追溯可通过减少DCO诊断来提高数据质量,这直接影响生存估计。追溯应定期且及时进行。

相似文献

1
Improving Data Validity at Population-Based Cancer Registry through Trace-Back of Death Certificates: A Concrete Experience in Argentina.通过死亡证明追溯提高基于人群的癌症登记处的数据有效性:阿根廷的具体经验
J Registry Manag. 2020 Summer;47(2):32-36.
2
Reduction of population-based cancer survival estimates by trace back of death certificate notifications: an empirical illustration.基于人群的癌症生存估计值因追溯死亡证明通知而减少:实证说明。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Apr;48(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.05.028. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
3
Estimates of lung and pancreatic cancer survival in Sweden with and without inclusion of death certificate initiated (DCI) cases.瑞典肺癌和胰腺癌生存情况的估计,包括和不包括死亡证明启动(DCI)病例。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Nov;59(11):1322-1328. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1826572. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
4
Deriving valid population-based cancer survival estimates in the presence of nonnegligible proportions of cancers notified by death certificates only.在仅有死亡证明报告的癌症比例不可忽视的情况下,推导出有效的基于人群的癌症生存估计。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Dec;20(12):2480-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0697. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
5
Evaluation of Data Quality of Four New Population Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) in Chandigarh and Punjab, North India- A Quality Control Study.评价印度北部昌迪加尔和旁遮普邦四个新的基于人群的癌症登记处(PBCR)的数据质量:一项质量控制研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 May 1;22(5):1421-1433. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.5.1421.
6
Implications from Under-reporting at Lifetime, Death Certificate Notifications and Trace-back on the Recorded Incidence of a "Newly" Established Population-based Cancer Registry.基于人群的“新”建立癌症登记处记录发病率中,终身漏报、死亡证明通知及追溯所带来的影响
Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(2):182-92. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0004. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
The validity of cancer information on death certificates in Norway and the impact of death certificate initiated cases on cancer incidence and survival.挪威死亡证明中癌症信息的有效性,以及死亡证明启动病例对癌症发病率和生存率的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;75:102023. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102023. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
8
[Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].[基于人群的癌症登记处登记完整性评估指标以及利用该指标对1966年至1992年大阪癌症登记处登记率的估计]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1998 Oct;45(10):1011-7.
9
Cancer Incidence in Older Adults in the United States: Characteristics, Specificity, and Completeness of the Data.美国老年人的癌症发病率:数据的特征、特异性和完整性
J Registry Manag. 2020 Fall;47(3):150-160.
10
Reduction of Death Certificate Only (DCO) Registrations by Active Follow Back.通过主动追踪回访减少仅死亡证明(DCO)登记。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2002;3(2):133-135.

引用本文的文献

1
Trend in cancer incidence in Mato Grosso and its health regions, Brazil, 2001-2018.2001 - 2018年巴西马托格罗索州及其健康区域的癌症发病率趋势
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;83(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01503-9.
2
Impact of the Management and Proportion of Lost to Follow-Up Cases on Cancer Survival Estimates for Small Population-Based Cancer Registries.失访病例的管理及比例对基于小人群的癌症登记处癌症生存估计的影响
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 30;2022:9068214. doi: 10.1155/2022/9068214. eCollection 2022.