Suppr超能文献

Peninsula 健康跌倒风险评估工具(PH-FRAT)在 25 家养老院中的使用情况和预测性能:一项使用常规收集数据的回顾性队列研究。

The use and predictive performance of the Peninsula Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PH-FRAT) in 25 residential aged care facilities: a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data.

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02973-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Peninsula Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PH-FRAT) is a validated and widely applied tool in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Australia. However, research regarding its use and predictive performance is limited. This study aimed to determine the use and performance of PH-FRAT in predicting falls in RACF residents.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using routinely-collected data from 25 RACFs in metropolitan Sydney, Australia from Jul 2014-Dec 2019. A total of 5888 residents aged ≥65 years who were assessed at least once using the PH-FRAT were included in the study. The PH-FRAT risk score ranges from 5 to 20 with a score > 14 indicating fallers and ≤ 14 non-fallers. The predictive performance of PH-FRAT was determined using metrics including area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

A total of 27,696 falls were reported over 3,689,561 resident days (a crude incident rate of 7.5 falls /1000 resident days). A total of 38,931 PH-FRAT assessments were conducted with a median of 4 assessments per resident, a median of 43.8 days between assessments, and an overall median fall risk score of 14. Residents with multiple assessments had increased risk scores over time. The baseline PH-FRAT demonstrated a low AUROC of 0.57, sensitivity of 26.0% (sensitivity 33.6%) and specificity of 88.8% (specificity 82.0%). The follow-up PH-FRAT assessments increased sensitivity values although the specificity decreased. The performance of PH-FRAT improved using a lower risk score cut-off of 10 with AUROC of 0.61, sensitivity of 67.5% (sensitivity 74.4%) and specificity of 55.2% (specificity 45.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although PH-FRAT is frequently used in RACFs, it demonstrated poor predictive performance raising concerns about its value. Introducing a lower PH-FRAT cut-off score of 10 marginally enhanced its predictive performance. Future research should focus on understanding the feasibility and accuracy of dynamic fall risk predictive tools, which may serve to better identify residents at risk of falls.

摘要

背景

半岛健康跌倒风险评估工具(PH-FRAT)是一种在澳大利亚的养老院中经过验证并广泛应用的工具。然而,关于其使用和预测性能的研究有限。本研究旨在确定 PH-FRAT 在预测养老院居民跌倒中的使用和性能。

方法

这是一项在澳大利亚悉尼大都市区的 25 家养老院中进行的回顾性队列研究,使用了 2014 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月期间常规收集的数据。共纳入了 5888 名年龄≥65 岁的居民,他们至少使用 PH-FRAT 评估过一次。PH-FRAT 风险评分范围为 5 至 20,评分>14 表示跌倒者,评分≤14 表示非跌倒者。使用包括接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、敏感性、特异性、敏感性和特异性在内的指标来确定 PH-FRAT 的预测性能。

结果

在 3689561 个居民日期间报告了 27696 起跌倒事件(粗发生率为 7.5 起/1000 个居民日)。共进行了 38931 次 PH-FRAT 评估,每位居民的中位数为 4 次评估,两次评估之间的中位数为 43.8 天,总体中位数跌倒风险评分为 14。多次评估的居民风险评分随时间增加。基线 PH-FRAT 的 AUROC 较低,为 0.57,敏感性为 26.0%(敏感性为 33.6%),特异性为 88.8%(特异性为 82.0%)。虽然特异性下降,但后续 PH-FRAT 评估增加了敏感性值。使用较低的风险评分截断值 10,PH-FRAT 的性能得到改善,AUROC 为 0.61,敏感性为 67.5%(敏感性为 74.4%),特异性为 55.2%(特异性为 45.6%)。

结论

尽管 PH-FRAT 在养老院中经常使用,但它的预测性能较差,这引发了对其价值的关注。引入较低的 PH-FRAT 截断值 10 略微提高了其预测性能。未来的研究应侧重于了解动态跌倒风险预测工具的可行性和准确性,这可能有助于更好地识别有跌倒风险的居民。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b7a/8973529/9d854685ecd6/12877_2022_2973_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验