Ramspek Chava L, Jager Kitty J, Dekker Friedo W, Zoccali Carmine, van Diepen Merel
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Prognostic models that aim to improve the prediction of clinical events, individualized treatment and decision-making are increasingly being developed and published. However, relatively few models are externally validated and validation by independent researchers is rare. External validation is necessary to determine a prediction model's reproducibility and generalizability to new and different patients. Various methodological considerations are important when assessing or designing an external validation study. In this article, an overview is provided of these considerations, starting with what external validation is, what types of external validation can be distinguished and why such studies are a crucial step towards the clinical implementation of accurate prediction models. Statistical analyses and interpretation of external validation results are reviewed in an intuitive manner and considerations for selecting an appropriate existing prediction model and external validation population are discussed. This study enables clinicians and researchers to gain a deeper understanding of how to interpret model validation results and how to translate these results to their own patient population.
旨在改善临床事件预测、个体化治疗及决策制定的预后模型正越来越多地被开发和发表。然而,相对较少的模型经过外部验证,且由独立研究人员进行的验证很罕见。外部验证对于确定预测模型在新的和不同患者中的可重复性及通用性是必要的。在评估或设计外部验证研究时,各种方法学考量很重要。本文概述了这些考量,首先介绍什么是外部验证、可区分的外部验证类型以及为何此类研究是准确预测模型临床应用的关键步骤。以直观的方式回顾了外部验证结果的统计分析和解读,并讨论了选择合适的现有预测模型及外部验证人群的考量因素。这项研究使临床医生和研究人员能够更深入地理解如何解读模型验证结果以及如何将这些结果应用于自己的患者群体。